EKSPROPRIASI MELALUI UTANG DALAM STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN ULTIMAT
https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.6315 Dr. Baldric Siregar, M.B.A., Ak.(1*)
(1) STIE YKPN Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study addresses ultimate ownership issue and investigates its implications on leverage. By using sample consists of firms listed in the Jakarta Stock Exchange for the period from 2000 to 2004, this study shows that the publicly traded firm ultimate ownership is concentrated in the hands of controlling shareholders. Ownership concentration can be divided into those of cash flow rights and control rights. Those two concentrations do not go together but have different implications. The controlling shareholders enhance their control domination through pyramid structures and crossholdings among firms. Control flow rights consequently exceed cash flow rights. The cash flow right concentration is a financial incentive to avoid expropriation. This conclusion is support by evidence of negative effects of cash flow rights on leverage. On the other hand, control right concentration is an incentive to generate private benefits through expropriation. This conclusion is support by evidence of positive effects of control rights on leverage. When control and cash flow rights are separated, the controlling shareholders have higher incentive to expropriation by participating in management. This is so because of higher negative effect of cash flow right leverage on leverage.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baskin, Jonathan., 1989. “An Empirical Investigation of the Pecking Order Hypothesis.” Financial Management. Spring: 26-35.
Bebchuk, Lucian., Kraakman, Reiner., dan George Triantis, 1999. “Stock Pyramids, Cross-Ownership, and Dual Class Equity: The Creation and Agency Costs of Separating Control from Cash Flow Rights.” NBER Working Paper No. 6951.
Boubaker, Sabri., 2003. “On the Relationship between Ownership-Control Structure and Debt Financing: New Evidence fromFrance.” Working Paper of University Paris XII-Val-de-Marne.
Bunkanwanicha, Pramuan., Gupta, Jyoti., dan Rofikoh Rokhim, 2003. “Debt and Entrenchment: Evidence from Thailand dan Indonesia.” Working Paper of University Paris 1-Pantheon-Sorbonne.
Burkart, Mike., Gromb, Denis., dan Fausto Panunzi, 1998. “Why Higher Takeover Premia Protect Minority Shareholders.” Journal of Political Economy. No. 106: 172-204.
Claessens, Stijin., Djankov, Simeon., Fan, Joseph., dan Larry Lang, 2000. “Disentagling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings.” Journal of Finance. Vol. 57, No. 6: 2741-1771.
Claessens, Stijin., Djankov, Simeon., Fan, Joseph., dan Larry Lang, 2000a. “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations.” Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 58: 81-112.
Claessens, Stijin., Djankov, Simeon., Fan, Joseph., dan Larry Lang, 2000b. “Expropriation of Minority Shareholders: Evidence from East Asia. Policy Research Working Paper 2088, The World Bank.
Du, Julan dan Yi Dai, 2005. “Ultimate Corporate Onership Structure and Capital Structure: Evidence from East Asian Economies.” Corporate Governance. Vol. 13, No. 1: 60-71.
Dyck, Alexander dan Luigi Zingales, 2002. “Privat Benefits of Control: An International Comparison. NBER Working Paper No. 8711.
Faccio, Mara dan Larry Lang, 2002. “The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations.” Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 65: 365-395.
Faccio, Mara., Lang, Larry H.P., dan Leslie Young, 2003. “Debt and Expropriation.” Working Paper of Chinese University of Hongkong.
Gaver, J.J. dan K.M. Gaver, 1993. “Additional Evidence on the Association between the Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies.” Journal of Accounting and Economics. No. 16: 126-160.
Harris, Milton dan Arthur Raviv, 1988. “Corporate Governance: Voting Rights and Majority Rules.” Journal of Financial Economics. No. 20: 203-235.
Harvey,Campbell., Lins, Karl V., dan Andrew H. Roper, 2004. “The Effect of Capital Structure When Expected Agency Costs are Extreme.” Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 74: 3-30.
Jensen, Michael C. dan William H. Meckling, 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs. And Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics. Vol. 3: 305-360.
La Porta, Rafael., Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio., Shleifer, Andrei., dan Robert Vishny, 1998. “Law dan Finance.” Journal of Political Economy. No. 106: 1113-1155.
La Porta, Rafael., Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio., dan Andrei Shleifer, 1999. “Corporate Ownership Around the World.”Journal of Finance. Vol. 54, No. 2: 471-517.
Myers, S. C. dan N. S. Majluf, 1984. “Coporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms Have Information that Investors Do not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics. June: 187-221.
PSAK 4. Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan 4 tentang Laporan Keuangan Konsolidasi.
PSAK 7. Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan 7 tentang Pengungkapan Pihakpihak yang Mempunyai Hubungan Istimewa.
PSAK 22. Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan 22 tentang Akuntansi Penggabungan Usaha.
PSAK 38. Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan 38 tentang Akuntansi Restrukturisasi Entitas Sepengendali.
Rajan, R.G. dan Luigi Zingales, 1995. “What Do We Know About Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data.” Journal of Finance. No. 50: 1421-1460. Shleifer, Andrei dan Robert W. Vishny, 1994. “Politicians and Firms.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. No. 109: 995- 1025.
Shleifer, Andrei dan Robert W. Vishny, 1997. “A Survey of Corporate Governance.” Journal of Finance. Vol. 52 No. 2: 737- 783.
Titman, Sheridan dan Robert W. Wessels, 1988. “The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice.” Journal of Finance. Vol. 42: 1-19.
Weinstein, David dan Yishay Yafeh, 1998. “On the Costs of a Bank-Centered Financial System.” Journal of Finance. Vol. 53: 635-672.
Wiwattanakantang, Yupana., 2000. “The Equity Ownership Structure of Thai Firms.” Working Paper of Hitotsubashi University.
Yeh, Yin-Hua., 2003. “Corporate Ownership and Control: New Evidence from Taiwan.” Corporate Ownership & Control. Vol. 1, No. 1: 87-101.
Zingales, Luigi., 1994. “The Value of Voting Right: A Study of the Milan Stock Exchange Experience.” Review of Financial Studies. No. 7: 125-148.
Zingales, Luigi., 1994. “What Determines the Value of Corporate Votes?” Quarterly Journal of Economics. No. 110: 1047- 1073.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.6315
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 1045
| 
views : 9535
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
| Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business |
| The Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business (print ISSN 2085-8272; online ISSN 2338-5847) is published by the Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia. The content of this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License |
| © 2019 Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business | Visitor Statistics |