Enacting Deliberative Governance in Innovation of Labour Protection Policy (Case Study in Banyumas District, Central Java)

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.102906

Tasroh Tasroh(1), Paulus Israwan Setyoko(2*)

(1) Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
(2) Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to enact labor protection policy deliberations as an alternative policy innovation. By using qualitative descriptive research methods and observations of various models of labor protection policy deliberation in Banyumas Regency and a study of labor protection policy documents in the period 2021-2024, with in-depth interviews with 50 key informants, it can be concluded that two models of policy deliberation are founded. They are an elite model held by executive and legislative actors; the other is called private one handled by labour and corporate organization actors. The two models finally unified to improve the labor protection policy design process, encourage the formation of various public discussions and debates, and encourage the authentic participation of citizens, corporations, and workers. By blending them, the degree of consensus and collaboration across interests autonomously develops their potential and authority to jointly realize the target of social security participation programs. However, there are still various obstacles, including the limited budget and minimal awareness of elite actors. It is recognized that the development of more democratic labor policy deliberations shows a positive trend for regional governments in the future as the new capital for regional development. Because of the wider involvement, participation, availability of legitimate public space and wider collaboration have been proven to significantly improve the quality of labor protection policies at a local level. However, supervision and policy guidance must be carried out by all actors to improve the welfare of workers as a whole.

Keywords


deliberative governance, policy innovation, labor protection, banyumas

Full Text:

PDF


References

Accomplishments, C. (2022). LEGISLATIVE & PUBLIC POLICY PRACTICE. Alma’arif, & Wargadinata, E. L. (2022). Adopting Open Government in Local Development Planning. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 26(1), 18–32. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkap Alsaadi, A. S. A., & Khudari, M. (2024). The Dynamic Relationship between Good Governance and Economic Growth in Oman. UCJC Business and Society Review, 21(80), 546–607. https://doi.org/10.3232/UBR.2024.V21.N1.13 Araos, M. (2023). Democracy underwater: public participation, technical expertise, and climate infrastructure planning in New York City. In Theory and Society (Vol. 52, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09459-9 Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7 Astengo, G. (2024). The Voices of the Model. Architectural Histories, 12(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.16995/ah.15230 Azmy, A., Hartono, D. K., & Mirza, M. (2023). The Effect of Organizational Transformation, Organizational Culture, and Transformational Leadership on Employee Performance Through Job Satisfaction: An Evidence from Automotive Component Manufacturing Companies. Management, 27(1), 95–129. https://doi.org/10.58691/man/170437 Bachtira, bachri S. (2017). Meyakinkan Validitas Data Melalui Triangulasi Pada Penelitian Kualitatif. Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(1), 46–62. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/139619 Baxter, S., Barnes, A., Lee, C., Mead, R., & Clowes, M. (2023). Increasing public participation and influence in local decision-making to address social determinants of health: a systematic review examining initiatives and theories. Local Government Studies, 49(5), 861–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2081551 Belghitar, Y., Clark, E., & Saeed, A. (2019). Political connections and corporate financial decision making. In Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting (Vol. 53, Issue 4). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0776-8 Benson, J. (2021). The epistemic value of deliberative democracy: how far can diversity take us? Synthese, 199(3–4), 8257–8279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03161-0 Biridlo’i Robby, U., Ardiyansah, & Hariyadi, A. R. (2024). Stakeholder Synergy in Social Innovation: Efforts To Reduce the Impact of Poverty in Indonesia. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n01-031 Cha, Y. H., Donovan, K., Shackley, S., & van der Horst, D. (2024). Place-Based Adaptation through Network Governance. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052155 Christie, A. P., Morgan, W. H., Salafsky, N., White, T. B., Irvine, R., Boenisch, N., Chiaravalloti, R. M., Kincaid, K., Rezaie, A. M., Yamashita, H., & Sutherland, W. J. (2023). Assessing diverse evidence to improve conservation decision-making. Conservation Science and Practice, 5(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13024 Chu, T., Haw, I. M., Ho, S. S. M., & Zhang, X. (2020). Labor protection, ownership concentration, and cost of equity capital: international evidence. In Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting (Vol. 54, Issue 4). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-019-00828-1 Chwalisz, C. (2019). A new wave of deliberative democracy. Carnegie Europe, November, 6. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/10-17-19_Chwalisz_Deliberative.pdf Chwalisz, C. (2020). Good practice principles for deliberative processes for public decision making. Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1787/b40aab2a-en Delgado-Baena, A., & Sianes, A. (2024). Power Dynamics in Collaborative Governance Processes: A Case Study of a Disadvantaged Neighbourhood in Southern Spain. Buildings, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14041002 Dexu, H., Min, Z., & Shuonan, Z. (2024). State-Owned Capital Participation in Private Enterprises: A Perspective of Debt Financing. China Economist, 2024(1), 14–42. https://doi.org/10.19602/j.chinaeconomist.2024.01.02 Dianto, I., Darta Taifur, W., Handra, H., & Febrianto, R. (2021). Analysis Of The Principles Of Transparency, Participation, Accountability Dan Value For Money In Public Policy Formulation. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(13), 3368–3381. FAO, & Agrinatura. (2019). Organising a Policy Dialogue – A practical guide. 20. Fath-Hiah, W. N., & Nafi’ah, B. A. (2023). Implementasi Program Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan Pada Pekerja Formal Di BPJS Ketenagakerjaan Tanjung Perak. Public Inspiration : Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 8(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.22225/pi.8.2.2023.67-75 Febiola, S., Tundjung, D., & Sitabuana, H. (2022). Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Terhadap Pekerja / Buruh Di Indonesia. Serina Iv Untar, 535–542. Fishkin, J. S. (2021). Deliberative Public Consultation via Deliberative Polling: Criteria and Methods. Hastings Center Report, 51(S2), S19–S24. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1316 Gherghina, S., Hasić, J., & Miscoiu, S. (2023). Ethnic groups and constitutional deliberation: Understanding participation in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Romania. Deliberative Constitution-Making: Opportunities and Challenges, 77–90. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003327165-6 Gordon, D., McKay, S., Marchildon, G., Sacha Bhatia, R., & Shaw, J. (2020). Collaborative governance for integrated care: Insights from a policy stakeholder dialogue. International Journal of Integrated Care, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4684 Hammersley, M. (2023). Are There Assessment Criteria for Qualitative Findings ? A Challenge Facing Mixed Methods Research 2 . What Are Criteria ? To answer this question , we need to step back in order to examine the nature of. 24(1). Hammond, M., Owusu, N. O., Nunoo, E. K., Boampong, G., Osman, A., Panin, A., Nyametso, J. K., & Essen, B. (2023). How quality of work-life influence employee job satisfaction in a gas processing plant in Ghana. Discover Sustainability, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-023-00127-9 He, B. (2018). Deliberative citizenship and deliberative governance: a case study of one deliberative experimental in China. Citizenship Studies, 22(3), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1424800 Kepp, K. P., Aavitsland, P., Ballin, M., Balloux, F., Baral, S., Bardosh, K., Bauchner, H., Bendavid, E., Bhopal, R., Blumstein, D. T., Boffetta, P., Bourgeois, F., Brufsky, A., Collignon, P. J., Cripps, S., Cristea, I. A., Curtis, N., Djulbegovic, B., Faude, O., … Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2024). Panel stacking is a threat to consensus statement validity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111428 Kim, D., & Choi, C. (2020). Civil society and labour rights protection in asia and the pacific. Pacific Affairs, 93(1), 89–127. https://doi.org/10.5509/202093189 Knappe, H. (2019). Participatory and Deliberative Democracy: Doing Democracy Differently, 45–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbkk41f.8 Koutras, N. (2020). The Public Policy Basis for Open Access Publishing: A Scientific Approach. Publishing Research Quarterly, 36(4), 538–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-020-09772-8 Kuci, A., Daragmeh, A., & Sági, J. (2023). The role and challenges of governments in promoting sustainable development. Prosperitas, 11(In press), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.31570/prosp_2023_0057 Le, N., Siddique, A. B., Jamour, F., Oymak, S., & Hristidis, V. (2021). Predictable and Adaptive Goal-oriented Dialog Policy Generation. Proceedings - 2021 IEEE 15th International Conference on Semantic Computing, ICSC 2021, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC50631.2021.00012 Lu, P., Zhou, L., & Fan, X. (2023). Platform governance and sociological participation. Journal of Chinese Sociology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00181-w Malaian, K., Myasnikov, V., & Balueva, A. (2019). Optimization of costs for labor protection of the enterprise. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 666(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/666/1/012092 Mancilla García, M., Abunge, C., Bandeira, S. O., Cheupe, C., Combane, D. J., Daw, T., Drury O’Neill, E. M., Hertz, T., Mubai, M., Muthiga, N., Sonetti González, T., & Shauri, H. (2024). Exploring a process-relational approach to qualitative research methods for sustainability science. People and Nature, January 2022, 1512–1523. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10667 Manosevitch, I. (2024). Cultivating Deliberative Citizenship Orientations in Communication Studies. 18, 4511–4532. Matindas, C. L. (2018). Analisis Hukum KetenagakerjaanTentang Perlindungan Buruh/Pekerja Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003. Lex Privatum, VI(3), 149–157. McCoy, M. S., Ward, M., Neergaard, R., Joffe, S., & Szymczak, J. E. (2024). Managing institutional conflicts: Stakeholder accounts of communication between conflict of interest and technology transfer offices. PLoS ONE, 19(8 AUGUST), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304519 Mudhofar, M. (2021). Performance Allowance, Motivation, Employees’ Work Achievement And Organizational Performance Among Goverment Employees. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 25(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.59680 Mukhitdinov, R. D. (2024). Innovation Policy Coordination: The Role of Communication for Uzbekistan. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 17(1), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2024-0006 Nae, T. M., Florescu, M. S., & Bălășoiu, G. I. (2024). Towards Social Justice: Investigating the Role of Labor, Globalization, and Governance in Reducing Socio-Economic Inequality within Post-Communist Countries. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062234 Nikmah Dalimunthe, Ariyadi Ariyadi, Agung Setia, Dwi Nur Annisa, Indah Khuzaimah, Dwi Indah Pertiwi, Egi Fadilah Saragih, Nadiah Rizki Nasution, & Irfan Iskandar. (2023). Peran Kebijakan Perlindungan Ketenagakerjaan Dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Pekerja. Jurnal Manajemen Riset Inovasi, 1(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.55606/mri.v1i3.1314 Pananrangi M, A. (2019). Inovasi Kebijakan Publik Dalam Perpektif Administrasi Publik. Jurnal Meraja, 2(3), 1–13. Parker, M. J., & Dodge, M. (2023). An exploratory study of deferred prosecution agreements and the adjudication of corporate crime. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(4), 940–954. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2022-0122 Pek, S. (2023). Reconceptualizing and Improving Member Participation in Large Cooperatives: Insights from Deliberative Democracy and Deliberative Mini-Publics. Management (France), 26(4), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.2023.8478 Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Tengah. (2021). Buku Data Statistik Ketenagakerjaan dan Ketransmigrasian Tahun 2021. 1–105. http://disnakertrans.jatengprov.go.id Pera, M., & Bussu, S. (2024). Towards Democratisation of Public Administration: Public-Commons Partnerships in Barcelona. International Journal of the Commons, 18(1), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1385 Pesch, U. (2008). The publicness of public administration. Administration and Society, 40(2), 170–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707312828 Plans, D., Case, T., Kırcami, A., & Erku, H. (2024). Deliberative Democracy and Making Sustainable and Legitimate. Riska Chyntia Dewi, & Suparno Suparno. (2022). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Media Administrasi, 7(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.56444/jma.v7i1.67 Riyoldi, R., Zulkarnaen, Z., & Patriani, I. (2022). Analisis Dynamic Governance DalamImplementasi Kebijakan Inovasi Pelayanan Pada Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan SipilKota Pontianak. PublikA Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara (e-Journal), 11(1), 179–198. Saleh, C., Hendrik, E., Zauhar, S., & Nuh, M. (2021). Collaborative Governance in Public Administration Perspective. In Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University (Vol. 56, Issue 6, pp. 655–665). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.6.58 Saner, M., Körner, M., & Lugschitz, R. (2023). 11 Diversity and inclusion. Breimer 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032630410-16 Saptawan, A. (2019). Actor Networking in Forest Fires Mitigation, Ogan Komering Ilir District, South Sumatra Province, Indonesia Alamsyah Department of Public Administration …. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 23(2), 92–110. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alamsyah_Alamsyah/publication/339138698_Actor_Networking_in_Forest_Fires_Mitigation_Ogan_Komering_Ilir_District_South_Sumatra_Province_Indonesia/links/5e40c24e299bf1cdb91be061/Actor-Networking-in-Forest-Fires-Mitigatio Sari, I., & Suswanta. (2023). Narrative Policy Framework: Indonesia’s Capital City Relocation Policy. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 27(1), 80–92. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkap Sergeenko, Y. S., Galkina, O. V., Zametina, T. V., Kombarova, E. V., & Petrov, D. E. (2020). Digitalization of Safety in the Field of Labor Protection. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 543(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/543/1/012001 Setälä, M. (2021). Advisory, Collaborative and Scrutinizing Roles of Deliberative Mini-Publics. Frontiers in Political Science, 2(January), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2020.591844 Shen, X., Wu, A., Ding, Y., Sun, Q., & Liu, M. (2024). Employee education, labor protection intensity and auditor risk perception. In PLoS ONE (Vol. 19, Issue 6 June). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298938 Siregar Timboel dkk. (2020). Upaya Peningkatan Kepesertaan dan Manfaat Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan Laporan Studi Juli 2019 - Februari 2020. 9. Sørensen, E., & Bentzen, T. (2020). Public administrators in interactive democracy: a multi-paradigmatic approach. Local Government Studies, 46(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1627335 Studies, M., Studies, M., Studies, M., & Studies, M. (2023). New Public Governance and Undermining of the Public Interest in Zambia Moses Chewe Clever Madimutsa Evans Daka Justina Namukombo. 3(2), 5–26. Syofyan, Y., & Gusman, D. (2023). Studi Perbandingan Sistem Jaminan Sosial Antara Indonesia Dan Malaysia Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak Kesehatan Di Indonesia. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(1), 208. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i1.325 Wei, W., & Muratova, Y. (2022). Executive power and politically connected independent directors: evidence from China. Asian Business and Management, 21(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00104-4 Weiland, S., Hickmann, T., Lederer, M., Marquardt, J., & Schwindenhammer, S. (2021). The 2030 agenda for sustainable development: Transformative change through the sustainable development goals? Politics and Governance, 9(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.17645/PAG.V9I1.4191 Xiang, H., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Yang, C., Huang, X., Bu, Y., & Wang, M. (2023). What Is the Rational Choice of Community Governance Policy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032395 Zhu, B., Liu, S., Li, H., Gao, Y., Chen, T., Sun, C., & Li, W. (2021). The effect evaluation of labor protection equipment allocation in power supply enterprises: A study of central provinces in China. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1802(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1802/2/022100



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.102906

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2559 | views : 2013

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2025 JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.