Functional Decentralization Construct in Decentralization Policy in Indonesia (A Study of Irrigation, Education, and Free Trade Sectors)

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.25383

Alma Arif(1*), Irfan Ridwan Maksum(2)

(1) Government Institute of Home Affairs (IPDN)
(2) Universitas Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research analyze the practice of irrigation, education, and free trade governance linked with functional decentralization concept in Indonesia’s decentralization policy frame. This research use constructivist approach and qualitative-descriptive method. Research result find several factors that cause functional decentralization in Indonesia’s decentralization policy for irrigation, education, and free trade is not adopted. Political institution is not adopted, independence of the farmers, integration of river and irrigation web, and state constitution, are the factors from irrigation side. Several factors in education are the existence of educational boards, the independence of school, devolution in education governance, and state constitution. For free trade, the institution of Batam governance, members structure in Batam’s boards, the uncertainty of BP. Batam in Indonesia’s administration structure, and state constitution, which make functional decentralization is not adopted. Generally, state constitution is major factor of functional decentralization is not adopted. The Construction of Decentralization in the Future of Indonesia’s Decentralization Policy especially in irrigation, education, and free trade can be done gradually begin from inter-local government cooperation, state-local collaboration in boards until establishing the functional decentralization’s organization.

 


Keywords


education; free trade; functional decentralization; irrigation; territorial decentralization

Full Text:

PDF


References

Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2014). The impact of functional decentralization and externalization on local government transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.012

Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., García-Sánchez, I.-M., Prado-Lorenzo, J.-M., & García-Sanchez, I.-M. (2016). Determinants of functional decentralization and their relation to debt: empirical evidence based on the analysis of Spanish municipalities. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(4), 701–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313501246

Guangwen, M. (2003). The Theory and Practice of Free Economic Zones: A Case Study of Tianjin, People’s Republic of China. Tianjin.

Hamidah, U. (2015). Pengaturan Hukum Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Air di Kota Bandar Lampung. Cita Hukum, 2(2), 322.

Hoessein, B. (1993). Berbagai Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Besarnya Otonomi Daerah Tingkat II. Universitas Indonesia.

Humes, S. (1959). The Structure of Local Governments throughout the World: A Comparative Introduction. USA: Springer.

Hung, N. K. (2009). Political and Administrative Decentralization in Vietnam. In S. Ichimura & R. Bahl (Eds.), Decentralization Policies in Asian Development (Vol. 1, p. 228). London: World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Kuks, S. (2002). The Evolution of the National Water Regime in the Netherlands. Twente: Center for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CCTE).

Kumorotomo, W. (2007). Citizen Charter (Kontrak Pelayanan): Pola Kemitraan Strategis untuk Mewujudkan Good Governance dalam Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta.

Kuswandi, A. (2011). Desentralisasi Pendidikan dalam Penyelenggaraan Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia. Governance, 2(1), 69–98.

Lan, G. Z. and G. C. (2010). Intergovernmental Relations in Mainland China. In E. M. Berman (Ed.), A Companion to Ancient Greek Government (pp. 75–96). New York: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118303214.ch19

Li, B. (2012). Engineering, Development and Philosophy, 11, 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5282-5

Maksum, I. R. (2006). Desentralisasi dalam Pengelolaan Air Irigasi Tersier (Suatu Studi dengan Kerangka Konsep Desentralisasi Teritorial dan Fungsional di Kabupaten dan Kota Tegal-Jawa Tengah, di Kabupaten Jembrana-Bali, serta di Hulu Langat-Selangor Malaysia). Makara, Sosial Humaniora, 10(1), 1–7.

Maksum, I. R. (2007). Memahami Desentralisasi Fungsional (Perbandingan Praktek di Belanda, Jepang, USA dan Jerman). Indonesian Journal of International Law, 4(3), 498.

Maksum, I. R. (2016, June). Darurat Desentralisasi Fungsional. Kompas, p. 7.

Murti, M. S. (2014). Urgensi Otonomi Khusus Batam dikaitkan dengan Pelaksanan Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean 2015. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 3(2), 215–235.

Muzwardi, A. (2015). The Analysis of Network Governance in the Investment Development of Free Trade Zone and Free Port ( KPBPB ) Batam. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik (JKAP), 19(2), 145–155.

Pasandaran, S. (2004). Desentralisasi Pendidikan dan Masalah Pemberdayaan Sekolah, 11(2), 115–129.

Selin, H. (2011). Governing the Tap: Special District Governance and the New Local Politics of Water. By Megan Mullin. Cambridge, {MA:} {MIT} Press, 2009. 280p. $44.00 cloth, $22.00 paper. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 105 107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087409360649

Sidik, F. (2015). Menggali Potensi Lokal Mewujudkan Kemandirian Desa. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik (JKAP), 19(2), 115–131.

Tantri, M. L. (2013). Trajectories of China’s Integration with the World Economy through SEZs: A Study of Shenzhen SEZ. China Report (Vol. 49). https://doi.org/10.1177/0009445513491526

Xu, S. (n.d.). China’s Public Administration Reform : New Approaches. Retrieved from http://www.iam.or.jp/asia-pacific_panel/pdfdownloads/athens01-paper4.pdf.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.25383

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 5402 | views : 2938

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2017 JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.