Resilient in a Feminine Face

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.7522

Bevaola Kusumasari(1*)

(1) Jurusan Manajemen dan Kebijakan Publik Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Isu tentang kerentanan perempuan dalam bencana telah banyak dibahas dalam berbagai literatur mengenai kebencanaan. Sebagian besar literatur menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kerentanan perempuan akan meningkat pada periode sebelum, selama, dan setelah bencana. Memahami bagaimana perempuan menjalani kehidupan pascabencana memberikan kontribusi terhadap kajian kebencanaan yang telah ada. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perempuan memiliki kemampuan yang baik dalam menghadapi bencana dan bertahan hidup, terlebih bagi perempuan yang memiliki warisan keterampilan. Diferensiasi latar belakang sosial ekonomi desa memberikan tampilan yang lebih lengkap baik dalam hal pola budaya yang terlihat maupun masalah yang lebih dalam mengenai cara perempuan untuk bertahan terhadap bencana. Perempuan dalam kajian ini me­ nyadari bahwa bencana telah memicu motivasi perempuan untuk membantu membiayai kehidupan ekonomi keluarga. Bahkan, pendapatan mereka saat ini telah berkontribusi besar bagi keluarga. Pada akhirnya, kemampuan bertahan hidup pascabencana sekaligus juga telah membangun kepercayaan dan harga diri perempuan serta memengaruhi relasi gender.

Keywords


Bencana alam, gender, kerentanan, perempuan

Full Text:

PDF


References

Adger, N., N. Brooks, G. Bentham, N. Agnew, and S. Eriksen. 2004. New Indicators of Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. Norwich.

Bourdieu, P. 1986. Forms of Capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241­-260). Greenwood Press. New York.

Chanavat, A. 2012. Women In The Workplace: Latesy Workforce Trends In Gender Equality. Thomson Reuters Investment Management. UK.

Coleman, J. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Press. Cambridge.

Cutter, S. L. 1995. The Forgotten Casualties: Women, Children, and Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 5(3): 181­-194.

Cutter, S. L., and C. T. Emrich. 2006. Moral Hazard, Social Catastrophe: The Changing Face of Vul­ nerability along the Hurricane Coasts. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1): 102­-112.

De Beauvoir, S. 1997. The Second Sex. Vintage. Great Britain.

Dynes, R. 2006. Social Capital: Dealing with Community Emergencies. Homeland Security Affairs 2(2): 1­26.

Enarson. 2000. Women’s Voluntary Work Expands: Gender Equality, Work and Disaster Reduction: Mak­ing The Connection. ILO In Focus Programme on Crisis Response and Reconstruction. USA.

Enarson, E. 2000. We will make meaning out of this: women’s cultural responses to the Red River Valley flood. Int. J. Mass Emerg. Disasters, 18: 39.

Enarson, E., and M. Fordham. 2001. From women’s needs to women’s rights in disasters. Environ. Hazards, 3: 133.

Enarson, E., and L. Meyreles. 2004. International perspectives on gender and disaster: differences and possibilities. Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy, 24: 49.

Enarson, E., and B. H. Morrow (Eds.). 1998. The Gendered Terrain of Disaster. Praeger. Westport.

Fatimah, D. 2008. Gender in Disaster Management: The Case of Merapi Mountain. Office of Women Empowerment­APEC Gender Focal Point. Indonesia.

Holman, E. A., and R. C. Silver. 1998. Getting Stuck in the Past: Temporal Orientation and Coping with Trauma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 1146­-1163.

Kusumasari, B. K., dan Q. Alam. 2012. Local Wisdom­ Based Disaster Recovery Model in Indonesia. Disaster Prevention and Management, 21(3): 351-369.

Labadie, J. R. 1984. Problems in Local Emergency Management. Environmental Management, 8(6): 489­-494.

Lin, N. 2000. Inequality in Social Capital. Contemporary Sociology, 29(6): 785­-795.

Lin, N. 2001. Social Capital. Cambridge University Press. New York.

Litt, J. 2008. Getting Out or Staying Put: An African­ American Women’s Network in Evacuation from Katrina. NWSA Journal 20(3): 32­-48.

Neumayer, E., and T. Plumper. 2007. The Gendered Nature of Natural Disasters: The Impact of Cata­ strophic Events on the Gender Gap in Life Expectancy 1981-­2002. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(3): 551­-566.

Pelling, M. 2003. The Vulnerabilities of Cities: Natural Disasters and Social Resilience. Earthscan. Lon­don.

Ross­Sheriff, F. 2007. Women and Disasters: Reflections on the Anniversary of Katrina and Rita. Af­ filia, 22(1): 5­8.

Scanlon, J. 1998. The Perspective of Gender: A Missing Element in Disaster Response. In E. Enarson & B. H. Morrow (Eds.), The Gendered Terrain of Disaster: Through Women’s Eyes. Praeger Publishers. Westport, CT.

Schwarzer, R., A. Hahn, and H. Schoder. 1994. Social Integration and Social Support in a Life Crisis: Effects of Macrosocial Change in East Germany. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22: 685-­706.

Timmerman, P. 1981. Vulnerability, resilience and the collapse of society: a review of modelsand pos­ sible climatic applications. Environmental Monograph 1. Institute for Environmental Studies. University of Toronto. Toronto.

Tobin, G. A. 1999. Sustainability and Community Resilience: The Holy Grail of Hazards Planning. Environmental Hazards., 1: 13­26.

Violanti, J. M., D. Paton, and C. Dunning. 2000. Post­Traumatic Stress Intervention: Challenges, Issues and Perspectives. Charles C. Thomas. Springfield, IL.

White, B., and E. Lestari. 1980. Hidden Subordination: The Influence of Men and Women in Household. IPB. Indonesia.

Wisner, B., P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, and I. Davis. 2004. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. Routledge. London.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.7522

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2135 | views : 2162

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2015 Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik