Post-Political Governance and the Return of the Political: PROPER-rated Geothermal Enterprise, Environmental Problems, and Civil Resistance in Dieng Plateau, Central Java

https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.88506

Gloria Evanda Fiko(1*), Masrur Alatas(2), Andayani Listyawati(3), Suryani Suryani(4), Soetji Andari(5)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Energy System Engineering, Faculty Of Industrial Technology, Institut Teknologi Yogyakarta. Indonesia
(3) National Research and Inovation Agency
(4) Badan Riset Dan Inovasi Nasional
(5) National Research and Innovation Agency
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The Industrial Environmental Rating Program (PROPER) from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia has produced various outcomes. Many companies strive to meet the PROPER assessment criteria, earning ratings represented by colors ranging from black to gold. Unfortunately, the indicators set by PROPER, namely compliance and beyond-compliance assessment criteria, are limited to technical and managerial aspects rather than substantial ones. Consequently, the ratings often become a means for environmentally polluting companies to polish their public image and attract investment. PT Geo Dipa Energi (Persero), a state-owned geothermal enterprise, is one of many companies that have obtained a blue PROPER rating. This company's presence in Dieng, Central Java, has faced civil resistance due to the various pollution issues caused by their activities. The company uses the blue PROPER rating label to create a mechanism called “post-political governance” to discipline civil resistance. This mechanism refers to the process of repressing the political dimension in society by introducing apolitical mechanisms. These apolitical mechanisms are found in the values of good governance, such as participation, transparency, fairness, accountability, and public inclusion, which PROPER aims to implement. This research was conducted in Karang Tengah Village, Dieng, and remotely from different locations. The findings show that Dieng residents, whose political dimension is being disciplined, are able to reclaim their political agency through civil and discursive political resistance—a set of conditions that Wilson and Swyngedouw refer to as “the return of the political.” This research aims to present a critical perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices by companies within the framework of PROPER, while also highlighting the role of the community as key actors in challenging the discourse of empowerment constructed by the company and PROPER policy.

 


Keywords


post-political governance, environmental governance, case study, PROPER policy, CSR

Full Text:

PDF


References

Afsah, S. (2013). Current status of PROPER (2001-2012). In Environmental Regulation and Public Discourse: The Case of PROPER in Indonesia. Routledge.

Afsah, S., Blackman, A., Garcia, J., & Sterner, T. (2007). Environmental Regulation and Public Disclosure: The Case of PROPER in Indonesia. Environment and Development Economics, 12, 739-756.

Aksoy, N., Simsek, C., & Gunduz, O. (2009). Groundwater Contamination Mechanism in A Geothermal Field: A Case Study of Balcova, Turkey. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 103(1-2), 13-28.

Alatas, S. H. (1977). The Myth of the Lazy Native: A Study of the Image of the Malays, Filipinos and Javanese from the 16th to the 20th Century and Its Function in the Ideology of Colonial Capitalism. Psychology Press.

Alford, J. (2002). Defining the Client in the Public Sector: A Social-Exchange Perspective. Public Administration Review, 62(3), 337-346.

Arifin, M. (2022). Dualitas Peran Pembangunan Korporasi: CSR dalam Kerangka Kebijakan Proper dan Lanskap Sosial Pemanfaat Program. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 9(1).

Badan Pengendalian Dampak Lingkungan. (1995). PROPER PROKASIH sebagai Perwujudan Aspek Penataan Lingkungan dalam Rangka Program Kali Bersih. Pusat Pengembangan Informasi dan Penataan Lingkungan Bada Pengendalian Dampak Lingkungan.

Bahruddin. (2020). The Effects of Public Voluntary Regulation in Developing Country Contexts: Comparing Regulatory Performance Across Sectors and Firms in Indonesia [Doctoral Thesis, The University of Melbourne]. School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Melbourne.

Beck, U., & Sznaider, N. (2010). Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda. The British Journal of Sociology, 61, 381-403.

Blackman, A. (2008). Can Voluntary Environmental Regulation Work in Developing Countries? Lessons from Case Studies. The Policy Studies Journal, 36(1).

Blackman, A., Afsah, S., & Ratunanda, D. (2004). How Do Public Disclosure Pollution Control Programs Work? Evidence from Indonesia. Human Ecology Review, 11(3), 235-246.

Bryant, R. (1998). Power, Knowledge, and Ecology in the Third World: A Review. Progress in Physical Geography, 22(1), 79-94.

Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Darmawan. (2022, January 27). Warga Sejumlah Desa Tolak Pembangunan PLTP Dieng, Kenapa? mongabay.co.id.

Dencio, M. S. (2019). Rencana Strategis PT Geo Dipa Energi (Persero) Unit Patuha 2019-2023. PT Geo Dipa Energi

Dipayana, G. F., & Ramadhan, R. A. (2022). Geothermal Energy in Indonesia. In Indonesia Post-Pandemic Outlook: Strategy towards Net-Zero Emissions by 2060 from the Renewables and Carbon-Neutral Energy Perspectives (pp. 159-180). Penerbit BRIN

Fauzi, A., Suryadarma, Soemarinda, S., & Siahaan, E. (2005). The Role of Pertamina in Geothermal Development in Indonesia. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress.

Fiorino, D. (2006). The New Environmental Regulation. MIT Press.

Forsyth, T. (2003). Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science. Routledge.

Garsten, C., & Jacobsson, K. (2013). Post-political regulation: Soft power and post-political visions in global governance. Critical Sociology, 39(3), 421-437.

geodipa.co.id. (2017, Juny 4). 80 Persen Lebih Warga Kebocoran Pipa PT GDE Tandatangani Berita Kesepakatan. geodipa.co.id.

geodipa.co.id. (2018). Community Development. geodipa.co.id.

geodipa.co.id. (2018). Dieng 2 dan Patuha 2. geodipa.co.id.

geodipa.co.id. (2018). Jejak Langkah. geodipa.co.id.

geodipa.co.id. (2019, April 25). Groundbreaking PLTP Dieng Unit 2 dan Patuha Unit 2. geodipa.co.id.

geodipa.co.id. (2021, March 31). Dua Kali Raih Penghargaan Tertinggi Bidang CSR, Bukti GeoDipa Berhasil Berikan Manfaat Yang Berkelanjutan. geodipa.co.id.

geodipa.co.id. (2023, January 1). Akhiri 2022, GeoDipa Raih Dua Penghargaan PROPER. geodipa.co.id.

Glassey, W. (2010). Geothermal Energy: Renewable Energy and the Environment. CRC Press.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan RI. (2013). A Journey to Gold: Achieving the PROPER Gold, Disseminating Virtues, and Protecting the Environment. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan RI.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan RI. (2019). PROPER 4.0. as SIMPEL as it is. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan RI.

Laila, A. Z., Jazil, A. F., Rapsaudina, F. S., & Amir, U. A. (2022). Dampak Pengembangan Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Panas Bumi (PLTP) Dieng terhadap Kondisi Lingkungan, Sosial dan Ekonomi Masyarakat Kawasan Dieng. Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.

Li, T. M. (2007). The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Duke University Press.

Li, T. M., & Semedi, P. (2021). Plantation Life: Corporate Occupation in Indonesia's Oil Palm Zone. Duke University Press.

McCarthy, J. (2013). We have never been “post-political”. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 24(1), 19-25.

Mitchell, J. C. (1983). Case and Situation Analysis. The Sociological Review, 31, 187-211.

Mouffe, C. (1993). The Return of the Political. Verso.

Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political. Routledge.

New Zealand Geothermal Association. (2023). What is Geothermal? New Zealand Geothermal Association.

OECD. (2001). Public Policy and Voluntary Initiatives: What Roles Have Governments Played? In OECD Working Papers on International Investment. OECD Publishing.

Pitkin, H. (1972). The Concept of Representation. University of California Press.

Portney, P. (2000). Environmental Problems and Policy: 2000-2050. Journal of Economics Perspective, 14(1), 199-206.

Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2011). Voluntary Programs, Compliance and The Regulation Dilemma. In Handbook on the Politics of Regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing.

proper.menlhk.go.id. (2019). Sejarah PROPER. menlhk.proper.go.id.

proper.menlhk.go.id. (2022, December 29). Pengumuman! Penetapan Peringkat PROPER 2021-2022. proper.menlhk.go.id.

Ranciere, J. (2004). Disagreement: Politics And Philosophy. University of Minnesota Press.

Rohman, F. (2020). Dualisme Konteks Proper sebagai Instrumen Penaatan Sukarela dan Command and Control. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 6(2), 235-265.

Saward, M. (2006). The Representative Claim. Contemporary Political Theory, 5, 297-318.

Schmitt, C. (1993). The Age of Neutralization and Depoliticization. Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary, 96, 130-142.

Scott, J. (1987). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Yale University Press.

Situmorang, S. T., Pakpahan, J., Panjaitan, B., & Telaumbauna, A. (2010). Orang-Orang yang Dipaksa Kalah: Penguasa dan Aparat Keamanan Milik Siapa? Perhimpunan Kelompok Studi Pengembangan.

Swyngedouw, E. (2007). The post-political city. Urban politics now, 58-76.

Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Depoliticized environments: The end of nature, climate change and the post-political condition. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 69, 253-274.

Swyngedouw, E. (2018). Post-Democracy: Thinking (Post-)Politicization. In Promises of the Political: Insurgence Cities in a Post-Political Environment (pp. 1-63). The MIT Press.

Swyngedouw, E., & Wilson, J. (2014). Seeds of Dystopia: Post-Politics and the Return of the Political. In The Post-Political and Its Discontents: Spaces of Depoliticisation, Spectres of Radical Politics. Edinburg University Press.

Tietenberg, T. (1998). Disclosure Strategies for Pollution Control. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3-4), 587-602

Verschuren, P. (2003). Case Study as a Research Strategy: Some Ambiguities and Opportunities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(2), 121-139.

Wheeler, D., & Afsah, S. (1996). Controlling Industrial Pollution: A New Paradigm. World Bank

Wicaksono, W. M. (2022, March 13). Penyebab Kecelakaan di Geo Dipa Dieng Didalami. kompas.id.

Wiratraman, H. P. (2007). Neoliberalisme, Good Governance, dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Hukum Jentera, (15).

Wittgenstein, L. (1972). On Certainty. Harper & Row.

Yin, R. (2014). Studi Kasus: Desain & Metode (Cetakan ke-13). Rajawali Pers.

Zizek, S. (2009). The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. Verso.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.88506

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 0 | views : 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.