Multitafsir Pengertian “Ihwal Kegentingan yang Memaksa” dalam Penerbitan Perppu

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16208

Janpatar Simamora(1*)

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The obscurity of noodverordenings in issuing government regulation in-lieu-of-law attracts hot debate. Since the requirement of ‘compelling crisis situation’ is very subjective, it tends to be politically abused. Therefore, the will of Article 22 of 1945 Constitution that gives room for this regulation in-lieu-of-law should be re-thought and reviewed.

 

Ketidakjelasan noodverordenings dalam mengeluarkan perppu mengundang perdebatan di masyarakat. Karena Presiden dapat menentukan kondisi ‘kegentingan yang memaksa’, kondisi ini menjadi sangat subjektif dan berpotensi disalahgunakan secara politis. Dengan demikian, penting bagi kita untuk menelaah dan memikirkan kembali maksud Pasal 22 UUDNRI Tahun 1945 yang memberikan payung hukum untuk perppu ini.


Full Text:

PDF



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16208

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 4253 | views : 22514

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2012 Janpatar Simamora

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Mimbar Hukum Indexed by:

DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journal) Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) COREWorldCatLIVIVOCopac JISTHarvard LibraryElectronic Journals LibraryColumbia University LibrariesLeiden University LibrariesUniversity of Saskatchewan-CanadaGent University LibraryWestern Theological SeminaryUniversity of OxfordThe University of SheffieldThe University of Manchester Toronto Public LibraryEbsco  

Member of :

Crossref


MIMBAR HUKUM ISSN: 0852-100X(print), ISSN: 2443-0994(online)