Keadilan Bagi yang Berbeda Paham: Rekonsiliasi dan Keadilan Bagi Korban Tragedi 1965

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16211

Manunggal Kusuma Wardaya(1*)

(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Human rights enforcement is one improperly- accomplished agenda in this post-1998 democratisation. Severe human rights violations such as 1965 Tragedy remain obscure, nonlitigation resolution (e.g. recognition and compensation) is considered the best solution. Recognition also is a form of respect to human rights and a stepping stone to resolve other tragedies.

 

Penegakan HAM merupakan salah satu agenda demokratisasi yang belum sepenuhnya tercapai. Pelanggaran-pelanggaran HAM berat seperti Tragedi 1965 masih belum jelas sehingga penyelesaian nonlitigasi (pengakuan dan kompensasi), dianggap sebagai solusi yang terbaik. Pengakuan tersebut merupakan bentuk tanggungjawab untuk menghormati HAM dan menjadi batu loncatan untuk mengungkap tragedi HAM lainnya.


Full Text:

PDF



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16211

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2727 | views : 18843

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2012 Manunggal Kusuma Wardaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Mimbar Hukum Indexed by:

DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journal) Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) COREWorldCatLIVIVOCopac JISTHarvard LibraryElectronic Journals LibraryColumbia University LibrariesLeiden University LibrariesUniversity of Saskatchewan-CanadaGent University LibraryWestern Theological SeminaryUniversity of OxfordThe University of SheffieldThe University of Manchester Toronto Public LibraryEbsco  

Member of :

Crossref


MIMBAR HUKUM ISSN: 0852-100X(print), ISSN: 2443-0994(online)