Perbandingan Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1992 tentang Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan dengan Rancangan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan

Mailinda Eka Yuniza(1*)

(*) Corresponding Author


There are several weaknesses of UU LLAJ. The first weakness is related to centralistic approach used in the UU. Second, the content of the UU has not yet been adjusted with several related new regulations. Third, it has not yet integrate land, marine and air transport. Forth, there are overlaps among related institutions on their rights and responsibilities. Fifth, it has not yet accommodated low-cost and efficient public services. RUU LLAJ, on the other hand, is drafted to elucidate the weaknesses of UU LLAJ. Some changes regulated on RUU LLAJ are regarding decentralization approach, new type of license and new authority on issuing license, and the integration of land, marine and air transport. Furthermore, the RUU LLAJ regulates public participation which has not yet regulated in UU LLAJ. Some of the changes are positive. However, the changes regarding the license system could increase public burden and could cause public confusion.

Full Text:



Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1734 | views : 2083


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2012 Mailinda Eka Yuniza

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Mimbar Hukum Indexed by:

DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journal) Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE) COREWorldCatLIVIVOCopac JISTHarvard LibraryElectronic Journals LibraryColumbia University LibrariesLeiden University LibrariesUniversity of Saskatchewan-CanadaGent University LibraryWestern Theological SeminaryUniversity of OxfordThe University of SheffieldThe University of Manchester Toronto Public LibraryEbsco  

Member of :


MIMBAR HUKUM ISSN: 0852-100X(print), ISSN: 2443-0994(online)