Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Peraturan Penetapan Standar Jasa Profesi Apoteker di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmpf.61125

Ingenida Hadning(1*), Bangunawati Rahajeng(2), Pinasti Utami(3), Siti Martini Khairiati(4), Noviya Wardhani(5), Nuariska Laila Ramadhani(6), Nanang Munif Yasin(7)

(1) - Program Studi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta - Pengurus Daerah Ikatan Apoteker Indonesia Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta
(2) - Program Studi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta - Pengurus Cabang Ikatan Apoteker Indoensia Kabupaten Bantul, Yogyakarta
(3) - Program Studi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta - Pengurus Cabang Ikatan Apoteker Indoensia Kabupaten Bantul, Yogyakarta
(4) Program Studi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta
(5) Program Studi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta
(6) Program Studi Farmasi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta
(7) - Pengurus Daerah Ikatan Apoteker Indonesia Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta - Departemen Farmakologi dan Farmasi Klinik, Fakultas Farmasi, Universitas Gadjah mada, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The small salary received by pharmacists is one of the reasons for the low attendance of pharmacists in pharmacies. The regional management of the Yogyakarta Special Region of Indonesian Pharmacist Association (PD IAI DIY) has issued a Decree (SK) on Professional Service Standards for Pharmacists in DIY in 2017 so that it can be used as a reference for pharmacists in Yogyakarta who practice in pharmacies. This study aims to determine the implementation of the decree on pharmacists in DIY. Research variables are basic services, additional income and other facilities. The research instrument is a questionnaire. The sampling method used is accidental sampling. To calculate the number of samples used the Slovin formula. With a confidence level of 90%, the minimum sample size is 222 respondents. However, in this study, 268 pharmacists who practice in pharmacies finally obtained respondents. Respondents came from five districts/cities in DIY. Data were collected from August 2019 to February 2020. The research instrument used an e-questionnaire on a google form which was distributed through social media for members of IAI DIY and also distributed directly to several pharmacies in DIY. The data obtained were analyzed through descriptive statistical tests. The results showed that only 11 respondents met all the criteria in the SK. In the category of pharmacists who hold SIA, only seven respondents met all the criteria in the SK, namely three respondents from Sleman, two respondents from Yogyakarta City, and two respondents from Bantul. In the non-SIA pharmacist category, only four respondents met all the criteria in the SK, namely one respondent from Sleman, two respondents from Yogyakarta City, and one respondent from Gunung Kidul. It can be concluded that the SK PD IAI DIY regarding professional service standards has not been fully implemented by DIY pharmacists.

Keywords


apotek; apoteker; jasa profesi; Yogyakarta

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Dominica D., Putra DP., Yulihasri. Pengaruh Kehadiran Apoteker Terhadap Pelayanan Kefarmasian di Apotek di Kota Padang. J Sains Farm dan Klin. 2016;3(1):99-107.
  2. Hartini, Y. S. (2009). Relevansi peraturan dalam mendukung praktek profesi apoteker di apotek. Majalah Ilmu Kefarmasian, 6(2), 5.
  3. Hutami, S. T., & Rokhman, M. R. (2013). Persepsi dan harapan konsumen apotek terhadap apoteker farmasi komunitas. Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2(3), 85-93.
  4. Mukaddas, A., Zubair, M. S., & Yusriadi, Y. (2019). Apotek pendidikan tadulako: implementasi pharmaceutical care secara professional pada lingkup farmasi komunitas. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 24(4), 865-869.
  5. Aditama H, Saputri A, Fadhilah D, et al. Gambaran Jasa Profesi Apoteker di Apotek Kabupaten Sleman. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi;8(2):51-58.
  6. Akmal, A., & Tamini, I. (2015). Pengaruh Kompensasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan Gayamakmur Mobil Medan. Jurnal Bis-A: Jurnal Bisnis Administrasi, 4(2), 59-68.
  7. Hulu, K. A. B. I., & Adidi, M. (2015). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan Bagian Perkebunan Pada Pt . Perkebunan Nusantara V Kebun Air Molek I. 1(2), 233–249.
  8. Hodgin R., Chandra A. Applying Economic Model ‘Efficiency Wage’ Concept for Pharmacists: Can ‘Efficient’ Salaries Reduce Pharmacist Turnover? J Health Manag. 2014;16(4):465-470. doi:10.1177/0972063414548552.
  9. Thin, S. M., Nakpun, T., Nitadpakorn, S., Sorofman, B. A., & Kittisopee, T. (2021). What drives pharmacists' turnover intention: A systematic review. Pharmacy Practice, 19(4), 1-20.
  10. Dylst, P., Vulto, A., & Simoens, S. (2012). How can pharmacist remuneration systems in Europe contribute to generic medicine dispensing?. Pharmacy Practice, 10(1), 3.
  11. Houle SKD., Grindrod KA., Chatterley T., Tsuyuki RT. Paying pharmacists for patient care: A systematic review of remunerated pharmacy clinical care services. Can Pharm J. 2014;147(4):209-232. doi:10.1177/1715163514536678.
  12. Dewi DAPS., Satibi., Puspandari DA. Analisis Biaya Obat pada Era JKN dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi di Fasilitas Penunjang Kesehatan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. JMPF.2015;5(4):283-291.
  13. Hadiningsih, H. (2018). Analisis Besaran Biaya Obat Beberapa Penyakit Rawat Jalan dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi di Rs. Awal Bros Bekasi Tahun 2014. Jurnal Administrasi Rumah Sakit Indonesia, 2(1).
  14. Ikatan Apoteker Indonesia. Surat Keputusan Pengurus Daerah Ikatan Apoteker Indonesia Nomor SK PD IAI DIY No 029/IAI-DIY/SK/VII/2017 tentang Standar Jasa Profesi Apoteker DIY: Ikatan Apoteker Indonesia; 2017.
  15. Scotia PA of N. Wage and Benefits Survey. 2013th ed. New Scotia: PANS; 2013.
  16. Scott DM. 2006 North Dakota pharmacists’ wage and workload assessment. J Pharm Technol. 2009;25(1):14-23. doi:10.1177/875512250902500104.
  17. Carvajal, M. J., Popovici, I., & Hardigan, P. C. (2019). Pockets of Inequality in the Distribution of US Pharmacists' Wages and Salaries: A Gender Comparison. Innovations in Pharmacy, 10(1).
  18. Polgreen, L. A., Mott, D. A., & Doucette, W. R. (2011). An examination of pharmacists’ labor supply and wages. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 7(4), 406-414.
  19. Zgarrick, D. P., Bujnoch, T., & Desselle, S. P. (2020). Wage premiums as a means to evaluate the labor market for pharmacy technicians in the United States: 1997–2018. Pharmacy, 8(1), 42.
  20. Scott DM., Halvorson D. Assessment of pharmacy technicians’ salary, benefits, and responsibilities in North Dakota. J Pharm Technol. 2007;23(3):148-157. doi:10.1177/875512250702300304.
  21. Dinas Kesehatan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. https://www.kemkes.go.id/resources/download/profil/PROFIL_KES_PROVINSI_2017/14_DIY_2017.pdf. Accessed Desember 25, 2020.
  22. Aprilyanti S. Pengaruh Usia dan Masa Kerja Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja (Studi Kasus: PT. OASIS Water International Cabang Palembang). Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri. 2017;1(2):68.
  23. Carvajal MJ., Armayor GM. The life cycle argument : Age as a mediator of pharmacists’ earnings. Res Soc Adm Pharm.2015;11(1):129-133. doi:10.1016/j. sapharhm.2014.05.003.
  24. Carvajal MJ., Armayor GM. Inequalities in the distribution of pharmacists’ wage-and-salary earnings : Indicators and their development. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2013;9(6):930-948. doi:10.1016 /j.sapharm.2013.01.004.
  25. Carvajal, M. J., Bernhardt, N. J., & Armayor, G. M. (2015). Pharmacists' earnings: Their level and distribution. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 11(2), e57-e67.
  26. Mahmudi H. Gambaran Tingkat Pengetahuan Apoteker Tentang Good Compunding Practice dan Implementasinya di Apotek. Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia; 2019.
  27. Utami, S. A., & Cholisoh, Z. (2019). Tingkat Kepuasan Pasien Terhadap Pelayanan Kefarmasian di Apotek Kabupaten Rembang. Pharmacon: Jurnal Farmasi Indonesia, 14(2), 54-61.
  28. Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia No 9 Tahun 2017 tentang Apotek. Jakarta: Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2017.
  29. Ikatan Apoteker Indonesia. Surat Keputusan Pengurus Pusat Ikatan Apoteker Indonesia Nomor 002/PP.IAI/11822/III tentang Peraturan Organisasi tentang Standar Minimal Jasa Profesi Apoteker di Apotek dan Klinik. Yogyakarta: Ikatan Apoteker Indonesia DI Yogyakarta; 2019.
  30. Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Awam Malaysia. 2020. “Pegawai Farmasi Gred UF41”. (http://spa.gov.my/spa/laman-utama/gaji-syarat-lantikan-deskripsi-tugas/ijazah-sarjana-phd/pegawai-farmasi-gred-uf41). Diakses pada 15 April 2020
  31. Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 tentang Tunjangan Hari Raya. Jakarta: Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia; 2016.
  32. Presiden Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Republik Indonesia Nomor 75 Tahun 2019 tentang Jaminan Kesehatan. Jakarta: Pemerintah Pusat Republik Indonesia; 2019.
  33. Pemerintah Pusat Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Jakarta: Pemerintah Pusat Republik Indonesia; 2013.
  34. Berdasarkan Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor HK.02.02/MENKES/412/2015 tentang penyesuaian besaran penghasilan tenaga kesehatan pegawai tidak tetap
  35. Barker, Alex. The 2021 Pharmacist Salary Guide. https://thehappypharmd.com/the-2021-pharmacist-salary-guide/. Accessed 4 Maret, 2022.
  36. Azikin, S. R., Ilyas, G. B., & Asiz, M. (2019). Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Melalui Komitmen Organisasi Pada Dinas Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Kabupaten Bantaeng. YUME: Journal of Management, 2(1).
  37. Sukwadi R. Perbaikan Struktur Gaji Dasar Karyawan Berdasarkan Hasil Analisa dan Evaluasi Jabatan. Spektrum Ind. 2014;12(1):93-104.
  38. Hermansyah, A., Pitaloka, D., Sainsbury, E., & Krass, I. (2018). Prioritising recommendations to advance community pharmacy practice. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 14(12), 1147-1156.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmpf.61125

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2967 | views : 2319

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 JURNAL MANAJEMEN DAN PELAYANAN FARMASI (Journal of Management and Pharmacy Practice)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

©Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi
Faculty of Pharmacy
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Creative Commons License
View My Stats