The Relationship Between Pharmacist Workload and the Clinical Pharmacy Services Quality of Kulon Progo Regency

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmpf.93714

Dina Nurlita Dewi(1), Eva Annisaa'(2*), Ragil Setia Dianingati(3)

(1) Pharmacy Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java
(2) Pharmacy Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java
(3) Pharmacy Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Clinical pharmacy service activities are the decisive roles of pharmacists in ensuring patient safety and quality of life, so there is a need for quality control in their implementation. However, several studies classify the clinical pharmacy services quality at primary health centers as needing improvement. On the other hand, pharmacists at primary health centers in Kulon Progo are overburdened, exceeding the standard rasio.

Objectives: This study aims to determine the relationship between the pharmacists workload and the clinical pharmacy services quality.

Methods: This study is an analytic observational study with a retrospective and prospective approach. The research participants are five pharmacists from the three sample primary health centers. The pharmacist's workload was measured using the daily log workload form, while the clinical pharmacy services quality was measured using ten indicators of clinical pharmacy service quality. The pharmacist workload is classified into heavy (>80%), moderate (60-80%), or light (<60%) categories. Meanwhile, the quality of clinical pharmacy services is classified into proper (>75%), fair (56-75%), or poor (<56%). The relationship between pharmacist workload and clinical pharmacy service quality was analyzed using the Somers correlation test.

Results: The pharmacists’ workload at Sentolo I, Temon I, and Galur II primary health centers, respectively, is heavy (94.05%), heavy (84.55%), and moderate (79.91%). The clinical pharmacy services quality at Sentolo I, Temon I, and Galur II primary health centers, respectively, were fair (56.57%), fair (69.21%), and proper (79.05%). Somers test results show a significant relationship (p=0.014) between the pharmacists’ workload and the clinical pharmacy services quality. The correlation coefficient obtained is -1,000.

Conclusion: There is a significant relationship between pharmacist workload and clinical pharmacy service quality.


Keywords


pharmacist; primary health centers; quality of clinical pharmacy service; workload

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Kemenkes RI. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2019. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2020.
  2. Menkes RI. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 74 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Pelayanan Kefarmasian di Puskesmas. 2016.
  3. Robiyanto R, Aspian K, Nurmainah N. Keberadaan Tenaga Apoteker dan Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pelayanan Kefarmasian di Puskesmas Wilayah Kota Pontianak. J Sains Farm Klin. 2019;6(2):121.
  4. Rasdianah N, Hiola F. Gambaran Penerapan Pelayanan Farmasi Klinik di Puskesmas. J Delima Harapan [Internet]. 2022;9(1):32–6. Available from: http://jurnal.akbidharapanmulya.com/index.php/delima/article/view/148/117
  5. Hanggara RSL, Gibran NC, Kusuma AM, Galistiani GF. Pengaruh Keberadaan Apoteker terhadap Mutu Pelayanan Kefarmasian di Puskesmas Wilayah Kabupaten Banyumas. J Kefarmasian Indones. 2017;7(1):67–76.
  6. Fadila N. Evaluasi Kinerja Pelayanan Farmasi Klinik di Puskesmas Kecamatan Sambas Kabupaten Sambas Provinsi Kalimantan Barat (Perbatasan RI-Malaysia). Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta; 2020.
  7. Norcahyanti I, Hakimah F, Christianty FM. Evaluasi Pelayanan Kefarmasian di Puskesmas Kabupaten Ponorogo. J Islam Pharm. 2020;5(2):26–35.
  8. Haris RNH, Indah A, Fudholi A, Satibi, Cahyadi A. Pengaruh Aspek Manajerial terhadap Pelayanan Farmasi Klinik di Puskesmas Kota Semarang. In: Seminar Nasional Teknologi Terapan Inovasi dan Rekayasa (SNT2IR). Sulawesi Tenggara: Program Pendidikan Vokasi Universitas Halu Oleo; 2019. p. 464–8.
  9. Kurniasih FD, Amalia L, Anggraini Y. Analisis Mutu Pelayanan Farmasi di Unit Rawat Jalan Rumah Sakit X di Bogor. Soc Clin Pharm Indones J. 2016;1(1):89–106.
  10. Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Profil Kesehatan Tahun 2021 (Data Tahun 2020). Wates: Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Kulon Progo; 2021.
  11. Satibi, Prasetyo SD, Rokhman MR, Aditama H. Penilaian Mutu Pelayanan Kefarmasian di Puskesmas. Siti, editor. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 2020.
  12. Biro Tata Pemerintahan Setda DIY. Statistik Penduduk Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Jun 13]. Available from: https://kependudukan.jogjaprov.go.id/statistik/penduduk/jumlahpenduduk/17/0/01/01/34.clear
  13. Rusdi R, Warsito EB. Shift kerja dan beban kerja berpengaruh terhadap terjadinya kelelahan kerja perawat di ruang rawat di Rumah Sakit Pemerintah. J Manag Keperawatan. 2014;2(1):12.
  14. Wardanis DT. Analisis Beban Kerja Tenaga Rekam Medis Rumah Sakit Bedah Surabaya Menggunakan Metode FTE. J Adm Kesehat Indones. 2018;6(1):53.
  15. Melati K, Wigati P, Arso S. Analisis Beban Kerja Bidan Desa Di Puskesmas Duren Kabupaten Semarang. J Kesehat Masy. 2015;3(3):30–40.
  16. Asbath R. Shift Kerja dan Beban Kerja Berpengaruh terhadap Terjadinya Kelelahan Kerja Perawat di Ruang Rawat di Rumah Sakit Pemerintah. Universitas Negeri Islam Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang; 2017.
  17. Sofiantika D, Susilo R. Hubungan Beban Kerja Dan Lingkungan Kerja Dengan Kejadian Kecelakaan Kerja Pada Perawat Ruang Rawat Inap Di RSUD Banyumas. J Keperawatan Muhammadiyah . 2020;(September):249–53.
  18. Nurjanah S, sakka ambo, paridah paridah. Analisis Beban Kerja Tenaga Perawat di Instalasi Rawat Inap Rumah Sakit Umun Daerah (RSUD) Kota Kendari Tahun 2016. J Ilm Mhs Kesehat Masy Unsyiah. 2017;2(5).
  19. Megawati F, Santoso P. Pengkajian Resep secara Administratif Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan RI No 35 Tahun 2014 pada Resep Dokter Spesialis Kandungan di Apotek Sthira Dhipa. J Ilm Medicam [Internet]. 2017;3(1):12–6. Available from: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/329103-pengkajian-resep-secara-administratif-be-79351a72.pdf
  20. Jaelani AK, Hindratni F. Gambaran Skrining Resep Pasien Rawat Jalan Di Puskesmas Kota Yogyakarta Tahun 2015. J Endur Kaji Ilm Probl Kesehat. 2017;2(1):1–6.
  21. Nursetiani A, Halimah E. Indentifikasi Persentase Kelengkapan Resep di Salah Satu Rumah Sakit di Kota Bandung. Farmaka. 2020;18(2):9–15.
  22. Rochjana AUH, Jufri M, Andrajati R, Sartika RAD. Masalah Farmasetika dan Interaksi Obat pada Resep Racikan Pasien Pediatri: Studi Retrospektif pada Salah Satu Rumah Sakit di Kabupaten Bogor. J Farm Klin Indones [Internet]. 2019;8(1):42–8. Available from: https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/ijcp/article/view/17732/pdf
  23. Rusli. Farmasi Klinik [Internet]. Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2018. Available from: http://bppsdmk.kemkes.go.id/pusdiksdmk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Farmasi-Klinik_SC.pdf
  24. Ansel H, Stockton S. Pharmaceutical Calculation. 15th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2017.
  25. Chaira S, Zaini E, Augia T. Evaluasi Pengelolaan Obat pada Puskesmas di Kota Pariaman. J Sains Farm Klin. 2016;3(1):35–41.
  26. Rajiah K, Ting LC, Shan CS, Ming LY. Community Pharmacists’ Perception on Patient Counseling and Continuing Pharmacy Education Program in East Malaysia. Malaysian J Public Heal Med [Internet]. 2016;16(1):15–22. Available from: https://www.mjphm.org.my/mjphm/journals/2016 - Volume 16 (1)/COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS’ PERCEPTION ON PATIENT COUNSELING AND CONTINUING PHARMACY EDUCATION PROGRAM IN EAST MALAYSIA.pdf
  27. Ejeta F, Feyisa D, Kebede O, Aferu T, Siraj J, Feyissa D, et al. Medication Counseling Practices in Medicine Retail Outlets Found in Bench Sheko Zone, Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region, South West Ethiopia. Pragmatic Obs Res [Internet]. 2021;12:105–17. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8403070/
  28. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan. Laporan Survei Indikator Kesehatan Nasional (Sirkesnas) 2016. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan, Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2016.
  29. Kemenkes RI. Petunjuk Teknis Standar Pelayanan Kefarmasian Di Puskesmas. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2019. 1–99 p.
  30. Mardiana LA, Nuraini A, Aulia CD, Rahmah DR, Nurkhofifah, Awaliya SB. Evaluasi Penerapan Standar Pelayanan Kefarmasian Berdasarkan PMK No. 26 Tahun 2020 di Puskesmas Rawamerta Karawang. J Buana Farma [Internet]. 2021;1(4):46–51. Available from: http://journal.ubpkarawang.ac.id/mahasiswa/index.php/buanafarma/article/view/269/198
  31. BPOM. Farmakovigilans (Keamanan Obat) : Panduan Deteksi dan Pelaporan Efek Samping Obat untuk Tenaga Kesehatan. Pus Farmakovigilans Nas [Internet]. 2019;1–26. Available from: https://e-meso.pom.go.id/web/useruploads/files/reference/5c88d7a5168fe_Buku Saku - Panduan Deteksi dan Pelaporan ESO untuk Tenaga Kesehatan.pdf
  32. Aldhwaihi K, Schifano F, Pezzolesi C, Umaru N. A systematic review of the nature of dispensing errors in hospital pharmacies. Integr Pharm Res Pract [Internet]. 2016 Jan 12;5:1–10. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29354533
  33. Arikunto S. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 2016.
  34. Suyanto, Amal AI, Noor MA, Astutik IT. Analisis Data Penelitian: Petunjuk Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa Kesehatan Menggunakan SPSS. 1st ed. Semarang: UNISSULA Press; 2018.
  35. Furqon. Statistika Terapan untuk Penelitian. 11th ed. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2018.
  36. Misbahuddin, Hasan I. Analisis Data Penelitian dengan Statistik. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara; 2014.
  37. Marquish BL, Huston CJ. Leadership Role And Management Functions In Nursing Theory & Application [Internet]. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2017. Available from: http://sbmu.ac.ir/uploads/marquis leadership roles and management functions in nursing theory and application 2017.pdf
  38. Shao S-C, Chan Y-Y, Lin S-J, Li C-Y, Kao Yang Y-H, Chen Y-H, et al. Workload of pharmacists and the performance of pharmacy services. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020;15(4):e0231482. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32315319/



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmpf.93714

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 304 | views : 362

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL MANAJEMEN DAN PELAYANAN FARMASI (Journal of Management and Pharmacy Practice)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

©Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi
Faculty of Pharmacy
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Creative Commons License
View My Stats