Chasing the Shadow of Green Energy Transition: Ineffective Policy Advocacy Towards Dieng 2 Geothermal Mining

https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.102134

Anala Ahimsa(1*)

(1) Department Public Policy and Management, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Despite the green energy transition efforts accelerating geothermal energy development, geothermal mining throughout Indonesia has encountered significant community resistance due to the detrimental environmental impacts. In Indonesia, the resistance movement that became the community’s tool for advocating policy failed to achieve its aims most of the time. Using the case study of geothermal mining in Dieng and its Dieng 2 expansion project, this study examines why community resistance as a means of policy advocacy remains ineffective in addressing community interests. Through field observations, semi-structured in-depth interviews, and a literature review, this study found that the key internal and external factors contributing to the ineffectiveness of policy advocacy are poor coalition solidity due to socio-economic dependency on the corporations, as well as an impaired democratic decision-making process. While other studies assume that community resistance emerges from shared values and interests, this study found that community resistance extends beyond the dichotomy of corporations against local communities, as the community itself cannot be considered a monolithic coalition with uniform beliefs or equal material interests. Blurring the dynamics inside a coalition can hinder what this study has found: the significance of the coalition's solidity for the success of community resistance.


Keywords


energy transition; bottom-up policy advocacy; community resistance; geothermal energy

Full Text:

PDF


References

Abdi, A. M., Murayama, T., Nishikizawa, S., Suwanteep, K., & Mariita, N. O. (2024c). Determinants of community acceptance of geothermal energy projects: A case study on a geothermal energy project in Kenya. Renewable Energy Focus, 50, 100594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2024.100594

Abowitz, K. K. (2000). A pragmatist revisioning of resistance theory. American Educational Research Journal, 37(4), 877–907. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037004877

Anggreta, D. K., Somantri, G. R., & Purwanto, S. A. (2022). Study of student community movements against the development of a geothermal power plant in Gunung Talang. The Journal of Society and Media, 6(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v6n1.p62-83

Anggreta, D. K., Somantri, G. R., & Purwanto, S. A. (2022c). Social Acceptance: Mapping the perspectives of stakeholder in the development of geothermal power plants in West Sumatra, Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(4), 1053–1065. https://doi. org/10.18280/ijsdp.170402

Benford, R. D., & D. A. Snow. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26 (1), 611–639. https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611

Berenschot, W., Dhiaulhaq, A., & Deviane, A. (2022b). Local brokerage and international leverage: NGOs and land conflicts in Indonesia. Journal of International Development, 35(3), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3640

Borras, S. M., Jr, Scoones, I., Baviskar, A., Edelman, M., Peluso, N. L., & Wolford, W. (2021). Climate change and agrarian struggles: an invitation to contribute to aJPSForum. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 49(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.1956473

Caballero, E. J. (2006). Advocating policy: Initiatives in mining and development. Practicing Anthropology, 28.

Daneswara, R. R., & Zarkasi, I. F. (2019b). Policy Advocacy in Resolving an Environmental Preservation Conflict: A Case of Policy Advocacy between the Government, Private Sector and Society in Kayen, Pati, Central Java. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 23(2), 154–170. https:// doi.org/10.22146/jkap.39702

Darma, S., Imani, Y. L., Shidqi, M. N. A., Riyanto, T. D., & Daud, M. Y. (2021). Country Update: The Fast Growth of Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress.

Day, A., McLeod, B., Hawkins, R. L., & Mogro- Wilson, C. (2023). The Importance of Policy Advocacy in Social Work. Families in Society, 104(3), 243-244.

Dhiaulhaq,A., & McCarthy, J. F. (2019). Indigenous Rights and Agrarian Justice Framings in forest land conflicts in Indonesia. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 21(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670243

Dunlap, A . (2021). Spreading ‘ green’ infrastructural harm: mapping conflicts and socio-ecological disruptions within the European Union’s transnational energy grid. Globalizations, 20(6), 907–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2021.1996518

Fajri, H., Ilham, Q. P., & Halawa, H. S. (2018b). Analysis of civil society movements: the case of construction of geothermal power plant in Mount Talang Area. E3S Web of Conferences, 74, 03003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187403003

Fajri, H., Halawa, H. S., & Wahyuni, N. (2023b). Non-State actor’s strategy in advocating the movement to reject development policy. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 8(2), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpas.2023.008.02.2

Fan, K., & Nam, S. H. (2020). Accelerating Geothermal development in Indonesia: A case study in the Underutilization of Geothermal energy. Consilience: Journal of Sustainable Development, 19(19), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.7916/consilience.v0i19.3895

Fitting, E. (2006). The Political Uses of Culture: Maize Production and the GM Corn Debates in Mexico. Focaal: European Journal of Anthropology, 48, 17–34.

Habibi, M. (2021). Masters of the countryside and their enemies: Class dynamics of agrarian change in rural Java. Journal of Agrarian Change, 21(4), 720–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12433

Hanum, W. N., Handayani, I. G. a. K. R., & Tegnan, H. (2023). The Geothermal Development Policy on Environmental in Indonesia and the USA. Journal of Human Rights Culture and Legal System, 3(2), 160–184. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v3i2.85

Hajer, M.A., 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ibrohim, A., Prasetyo, R. M., & Rekinagara, I. H. (2019). Understanding Social Acceptance of Geothermal Energy: A Case Study from Mt. Lawu, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 254, 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/254/1/012009

Kashem, S.B.A., Hasan-Zia, M., Nashbat, M., Kunju, A., Esmaeili, A., Ashraf, A., Odud, M.A., Majid, M.E., & Chowdhury, M.E.H. (2021). A Review and Feasibility Study of Geothermal Energy in Indonesia. International Journal of Technology, 2021.

Layman, E., Agus, I., & Warsa, S. (2002). The Dieng Geothermal Resource, Central Java, Indonesia. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, 26.

Leucht, M., Kölbel, T., Laborgne, P., & Khomenko, N. (2010). The Role of Societal Acceptance in Renewable Energy Innovations Breakthrough in the Case of Deep Geothermal Technology. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2010.

Marbun, B. T. H., Ridwan, R., Sinaga, S., Pande, B., & Purbantanu, B. (2019). Casing failure identification of long-abandoned geothermal wells in Field Dieng, Indonesia. Geothermal Energy, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-019-0146-3

McLaverty, P. 2011. Participation. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The Sage handbook of governance (pp. 402–417). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Meyer, D. S., & Staggenborg, S. (2012). Thinking about Strategy. In University of Minnesota Press eBooks (pp. 3–22). https://doi.org/10.5749/ minnesota/9780816672899.003.0001

Muhammad, R. R. D., Yogandari, A. P. P., Aunurrofiq, M., Suryansyah, A. R., Hendri, H., & Marza, S. (2022c). Social Impact Management of Land Clearing Process in Dieng 2 Sub-Project, PT Geo Dipa Energi (Persero). IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1014(1), 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1014/1/012018

Mullard, C. (1985). Race, power and resistance. London: Routledge.

Pambudi, N. A., & Ulfa, D. K. (2024). The geothermal energy landscape in Indonesia: A comprehensive 2023 update on power generation, policies, risks, phase and the role of education. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 189, 114008. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114008

Pambudi, N. A., Pramudita, V. S., Biddinika, M. K., & Jalilinasrabady, S. (2022). So Close Yet so Far–How People in the Vicinity of Potential Sites Respond to Geothermal Energy Power Generation: Evidence from Indonesia. Evergreen, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5109/4774210

Pasqualetti, M. J. (2011). Social barriers to renewable energy landscapes. Geographical Review, 101(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2011.00087.x

Pattenden, J. (2018b). The politics of classes of labor: fragmentation, reproduction zones and collective action in Karnataka, India. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(5–6),1039–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1495625

Popovski K. (2003) Political and public acceptance of geothermal energy, Lectures on the sustainable use and operating policy for geothermal resources. UNU-GTP, Iceland.

Pratiwi, S., & Juerges, N. (2022b). Advocacy Coalitions and Knowledge Transfer within Geothermal Policy Change in Indonesian Conservation Forests. The Journal of Environment & Development, 31(2), 168–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965211070244

Renoth, R., Buchner, E., Schmieder, M., Keim, M. F., Plechaty, M., & Drews, M. (2023). Social acceptance of geothermal technology on a global view: a systematic review. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-023-00432-1

Sabatier, P. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00136406

Santoso, P. F., & Kusumasari, B. (2019). Key elements of environmental justice in the Geothermal Power Plant Resistance movement. Jurnal Politik, 5(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v5i1.207

Sauni, H., Fernando, J. Z., & Sandra, S. (2022). Geothermal energy in rules, environmental problems and community conflict solutions. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 11(3).

Schneider, M., & P. McMichael. 2010. Deepening, and Repairing, the Metabolic Rift. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(3), 461–484.

Soltani, M., Kashkooli, F. M., Souri, M., Rafiei, B., Jabarifar, M., Gharali, K., & Nathwani, J. (2021). Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 140, 110750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110750

Sondakh, G. G., & Palsson, B. (2021). Dieng Geothermal Project: Risk Assessment for the Decision on 60 MW Expansion. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress.

Sotirov, M., & Memmler, M. (2011b). The Advocacy Coalition Framework in natural resource policy studies—Recent experiences and further prospects. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.007

Sucahyo, N. (2022, October 27). Petani Dieng gigih menolak proyek PLTP Geo Dipa Energi. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/ petani-dieng-gigih-menolak-proyek-pltp-geo-dipa-energi/6805886.html

Tarrow, S. (20110. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Temper, L., Avila, S., Del Bene, D., Gobby, J., Kosoy, N., Billon, P. L., Martinez-Alier, J., Perkins, P., Roy, B., Scheidel, A., & Walter, M. (2020b). Movements shaping climate futures: A systematic mapping of protests against fossil fuel and low-carbon energy projects. Environmental Research Letters, 15(12), 123004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc197

Trisiah, A., De Vries, G., & De Bruijn, H. (2022b). Framing Geothermal Energy in Indonesia: A Media Analysis in A Country with Huge Potential. Environmental Communication, 16(7), 993–1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2144403

Vargas-Payera, S., Martínez-Reyes, A., & Ejderyan, O. (2020c). Factors and dynamics of the social perception of geothermal energy: Case study of the Tolhuaca exploration project in Chile. Geothermics, 88, 101907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101907

Wahlund, & Palm. (2022). The Role of Energy Dem oc rac y and E nergy Citizenship for Participatory Energy Transitions: A Comprehensive review. Energy Research & Social Science.

Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P.A., & McQueen, K., (2009). Themes and variations: taking stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. The Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 121–140.

Wiguna, B. A., & Fiko, G. E. (2024b). Post- Political Governance and the return of the Political: PROPER-rated geothermal enterprise, environmental problems, and civil resistance in Dieng Plateau, Central Java. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 28(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.88506

Yuliani, D. (1994). Design for community approach in geothermal development: Notes from a case of community resistance. PROCEEDINGS, 2nd ITB International Geothermal Workshop 2013.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.102134

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 12 | views : 4

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  Information:

Announcement of Temporary Submission Closure

Dear Authors,

We would like to inform you that article submissions for the Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JSP) are temporarily closed. This closure is effective from 18 November to 31 December 2025.

The temporary closure aims to reduce the waiting time for authors in our system and to improve the quality of our editorial services. Thank you for your attention and cooperation. We look forward to your contributions in upcoming editions.

Sincerely,
Editorial Team
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JSP)

    

 

 

  View My Stats