Email this article 
Political Clientelism in Presidential Elections: Voting Behaviour and Social Assistance
https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.94625 Moch. Noor(1), Mohammad Hidayaturrahman(2*), Anak Agung Putu Sugiantiningsih(3)
(1) STISPOL Wira Bhakti, Bali, Indonesia
(2) Wiraraja University, Madura, Indonesia
(3) Warmadewa University, Bali, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Clientelism is a dangerous practice for democratic countries as it exploits poverty for elections. Despite the risks associated with clientelism, political actors in various countries continue to engage in it in election campaigns to win political contests. This study aims to understand voter behaviour and clientelism in the 2024 Indonesian presidential election. The study focuses on the use of the government's social assistance in “election campaigns” and how it impacts voter behaviour. This study uses mixed methods, quantitative surveys before the 2024 presidential election, and qualitative analysis, especially content analysis of documents in online media. The study revealed that clientelism in the form of social assistance impacts voter behaviour. The findings also show four critical factors: the timing of the distribution of social assistance, direct distribution of social assistance by the president, the current economic condition of the community, and the form of social assistance in cash and basic needs. The study contributes to the theory of voter behaviour by shaping voter behaviour outside the aspect of the voter, such as economic factors. Empirically, this research is also helpful for improving the regulations or laws of general elections in Indonesia, which can improve the governance of social assistance to avoid being used as a means of campaigning by incumbent officials.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adefisoye, T. O., & Braimah, F. I. (2023). Resurging Prebendalism, Clientelism and Candidate Endorsement Syndrome: A Critique of the 2019 Presidential Election in Nigeria. Adeleke University Journal of Business and Social Sciences (AUJBSS), 3(1), 264–265. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7893011
Ahdiat, A. (2024, March 21). Hasil Rekap Pilpres 2024 KPU Tak Jauh dari Quick Count. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2024/03/21/hasil-rekap-pilpres-2024-kpu-tak-jauh-dari-quick-count
Ahlquist, J., Copelovitch, M., & Walter, S. (2020). The Political Consequences of External Economic Shocks: Evidence from Poland. American Journal of Political Science, 64(2), 904–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12503
Akee, R., Copeland, W. E., Costello, J., Holbein, J. B., & Simeonova, E. (2018). Family Income and the Intergenerational Transmission of Votin g Be havior: Evidence from an Income Intervention (24770). https://doi.org/10.3386/w24770
Alaina, H. (2024, January 22). President Jokowi Distributes Rice Social Assistance in Salatiga, Residents Hope This. https://jateng.solopos.com/presiden-jokowi- bagikan-bansos-beras-di-salatiga-warga- berharap-ini-1846176
Altındağ, O., & Kaushal, N. (2021). Do refugees impact voting behavior in the host country? Evidence from Syrian refugee inflows to Turkey. Public Choice, 186(1–2), 149–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00768-3
Anelli, M., Colantone, I., & Stanig, P. (2019). We Were the Robots: Automation and Voting Behavior in Western Europe We Were the Robots: Automation and Voting Behavior in Western Europe. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3419966
Arjon, S. (2024). The Candidate’s Dilemma: Anticorruptionism and Money Politics in Indonesian Election Campaigns. Journal of Asian Studies, 83(2), 500. https://doi.org/10.1215/00219118-11058282
Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2015). Patronase dan klientelisme dalam politik elektoral di Indonesia. In E. Aspinall & M. Sukmajati (Eds.), Politik Uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan Klientelisme Pada Pemilu Legislatif 2014 (1st ed., pp. 10–11). https://polgov.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/1667/2022/02/politik-uang-di-indonesia.pdf
Basuki, A. (2024, February 9). Social Assistance Becomes a Political Tool, Jokowi Asked to Stop Aid Ahead of the 2024 Election. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/5524412/bansos-jadi-alat-politik- jokowi-diminta-setop-bantuan-jelang- pemilu-2024?
Berenschot, W. (2018). Incumbent bureaucrats: Why elections undermine civil service reform in Indonesia. Public Administration and Development, 38(4), 135. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1838
Blunt, P., Turner, M., & Lindroth, H. (2012). Patronage’s progress in post-soeharto indonesia. Public Administration and Development, 32(1), 64–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.617
Cahyati, D. D., & Lopo, H. L. Y. (2019). Daily Patronage Politics: A Village Chief ’s Route to Power. PCD Journal, 7(2), 169–170. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.51737
Central Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Poverty Profile in Indonesia March 2023. https://www.bps. go.id/id/pressrelease/2023/07/17/2016/profil-kemiskinan-di-indonesia-maret-2023.html
Colantone, I., & Stanig, P. (2018). The Trade Origins of Economic Nationalism: Import Competition and Voting Behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12358
Dagur, R. (2024, February 15). Because of Social Assistance and Supported by Jokowi, Reasons Prabowo-Gibran Voters in Flores, Put Aside News About Alleged Fraud and Human Rights Violations. https://floresa.co/pemilu-2024/61147/2024/02/15/karena-bansos-dan-didukung-jokowi-alasan-pemilih-prabowo-gibran-di-flores-kesampingkan-kabar-soal-dugaan-kecurangan-dan-pelanggaran-ham
Danesi, M. (2015). The semiotics of the mass media. In International Handbook of Semiotics (p. 485). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_20
Elder, E. M., Enos, R. D., & Mendelberg, T. (2023). The Long-Term Effects of Neighborhood Disadvantage on Voting Behavior: The “Moving to Opportunity” Experiment. American Political Science Review, 1, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423000692
Farhan. (2023, September 17). Rice Prices Soar: The Number of Poor People May Increase. https://tangselpos.id/detail/16001/harga-beras-melambung
Fathulrahman, A. (2024, January 29). Jokowi has distributed direct social assistance dozens of times. https://www.republika.id/ posts/50006/sudah-belasan-kali-jokowi-bagikan-langsung-bansos
Febrian, A. R. (2024, February 5). Jokowi’s Covert Campaign. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/kampanye-terselubung-jokowi-226hKtAXq3s/full
Fossati, D. (2019). The Resurgence of Ideology in Indonesia: Political Islam, Aliran and Political Behaviour. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 38(2), 119–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103419868400
Gans-Morse, J., Mazzuca, S., & Nichter, S. (2014). Varieties of Clientelism: Machine Politics during Elections. The American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 415–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12058
Gonzalez-Ocantos, E., & Oliveros, V. (2019). Clientelism in Latin American Politics. Politics, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1677
Hadiz, V. R. (2019). The ‘Floating’ Ummah in the Fall of ‘Ahok’ in Indonesia. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 7(2), 271–272. https://doi. org/10.1017/trn.2018.16
Halida, R., Susianto, H., Mujani, S., & Pratama, A. J. (2022). Vote-Selling as Unethical Behavior: Effects of Voter’s Inhibitory Self-Control, Decision Toward Vote- Buying Money, and Candidate’s Quality in Indonesia Election. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 10(2), 570. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5643
Hara, A. (2001). The Difficult Journey of Democratization in Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 23(2), 307–308. https://doi.org/http://www.jstor.org/stable/25798548
Harahap, A. F., Jakimow, T., Siahaan, A. Y., & Yumasdaleni. (2023). Is money an insurmountable barrier to women’s political representation in transactional democracies? Evidence from North Sumatera, Indonesia. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 11(4), 733–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2022.2041442
Hardiantoro, A., & Nugroho, R. S. (2024, February 2). 4 social assistances disbursed in February 2024, there is BLT IDR 600,000 and 10 kg of rice. https://www.kompas. com/tren/read/2024/02/02/130000965/4- bansos-yang-cair-februari-2024-ada-blt-rp-600.000-dan-beras-10-kg?
Harrop, M., & Miller, W. L. (1987). Elections and Voters: A comparative introduction. In Elections and Voters (1st ed.). Red Globe Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18912-0
Hicken, A. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 289–290. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220508
Hidalgo, F. D., & Nichter, S. (2016). Voter Buying: Shaping the Electorate through Clientelism. The American Journal of Political Science, 60(2), 436–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12214
Honna, J. (1999). Military Ideology in Response to Democratic Pressure during the Late Suharto Era: Political and Institutional Contexts. Indonesia, 67(77–78). https://doi.org/10.2307/3351378
Ibrahim, A. (2024, February 5). The significant influence of social assistance is brought up by Anies & Ganjar in the debate. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20240205083533-617-1058608/pengaruh-signifikan-bansos-hingga-diungkit-anies-ganjar-dalam-debat.
Kavanagh, D. (1986). How we vote now. Electoral Studies, 5(1), 19–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(86)90025-9
Keefer, A. P., & Vlaicu, R. (2008). Democracy, Credibility, and Clientelism. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 24(2), 371–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewm054
Klinken, G. van. (2009). Patronage Democracy in Provincial Indonesia. In Rethinking Popular Representation (pp. 141–142). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230102095_8
Kramon, E. (2017). Ethnic group institutions and electoral clientelism. Party Politics, 25(3), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817728212
Kurniawan, S. (2024, January 30). Jokowi Distributes Bulog Rice Social Assistance in Bantul: This is Premium. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20240130124306-532-1056123/jokowi-bagikan-bansos-beras-bulog-di-bantul-ini-premium
Lazar, S. (2004). Personalist Politics, Clientelism and Citizenship: Local Elections in El Alto, Bolivia. The Bulletin of Latin American Research, 23(2), 228–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-9856.2004.00106.x
Malau, S. (2024, January 31). Video When Jokowi Intensively Distributes Social Assistance During the Campaign Period: Flood of Criticism, Minister of Social Affairs Was Not Invited. https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2024/01/31/video-saat-jokowi-gencar-bagikan-bansos-di-masa-kampanye-banjir-kritik-mensos-tak-diajak?
Marzuqi, A. M. (2024, January 31). Jokowi’s ambition to win Gibran, increase ASN salaries and increase the social assistance budget. Mediaindonesia.Com.
Meidyana, A. (2024, January 27). Behind Jokowi’s Action to Intensively Distribute Social Assistance Ahead of the Presidential Election. https://www.metrotvnews.com/play/N0BCvODP-di-balik-aksi-jokowi-gencar-bagi-bagi-bansos-jelang-pilpres
Merkl, P. H. (1974). Comparative Political Corruption. James C. Scott. The Journal of Politics, 36(1), 256–257. https://doi.org/10.2307/2129139
Mietzner, M. (2012). Ending the war in Aceh: Leadership, patronage and autonomy in Yudhoyono’s Indonesia. In R. Ganguly (Ed.), Autonomy and Ethnic Conflict in South and South-East Asia (1st ed., p. 26). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118849
Mişcoiu, S., & Kakdeu, L. (2023). Authoritarian Clientelism: The Case of the President’s ‘Creatures’ in Cameroon. In Political Parties and Electoral Clientelism (pp. 49–50). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37295-7_4
Muhammad, F. A. (2020). Politician’s Strategy After the Pandemic: Strengthening of Patronage Goods in The Form of Social Assistance. The 2nd International Conference on Global Development-ICODEV, 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2020i7.9527
Muhtadi, B. (2019). Vote Buying in Indonesia: The Mechanics of Electoral Bribery (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6779-3
Mutawalli, M., Ayub, Z. A., & Faga, H. P. (2023). Revitalizing Political Parties in Indonesia: Dissecting Patronage-Clientelism Dynamics vis-à-vis Political Representation. Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia, 2(2), 301–302. https://doi.org/10.59066/jmi.v2i2.467
Nugraha, R. F. (2024, February 15). Ganjar’s defeat in the bullpen in Central Java and Bali is considered to be the impact of the social assistance provided by President Jokowi. https://www.tribunnews.com/ mata-lokal-memilih/2024/02/15/ganjar-kalah-di-kandang-banteng-jateng-dan-bali-dinilai-efek-bansos-presiden-jokowi.
Nugroho, R. A. (2024, January 31). Jokowi Distributes IDR 11.2 TBLT During Campaign Period, this is Sri Mulyani’s Explanation. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20240131093100-4-510397/jokowi-bagi-blt-rp112-t-di-masa- kampanye-ini-penjelasan-sri-mulyani
Özel, I. D., & Yıldırım, K. (2019). Political Consequences of Welfare Regimes: Social Assistance and Support for Presidentialism in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, 24(4), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2019.1589155
Penfold-Becerra, M. (2018). Clientelism and Social Funds: Evidence from Chávez’s Misiones. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(2), 63–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2007.tb00392.x
Pramudyani, Y. D. (2023, December 14). President: BLT El Nino helps the purchasing power of climate-affected communities. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3871230/presiden-blt-el-nino- bantu-daya-beli-masyarakat-terdampak-iklim
Putri, A. T. K. (2024, January 4). Jokowi’s social assistance is considered to increase Prabowo-Gibran’s electability: Because so far there has been the impression that Jokowi supports Prabowo-Gibran. Kbr.Id. https://kbr.id/nasional/01-2024/ bansos-jokowi-dinilai-kerek-elektabilitas-prabowo-gibran/113868.html
Rauschenbach, M., & Paula, K. (2019). Intimidating voters with violence and mobilizing them with clientelism. Journal of Peace Research, 56(5), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343318822709
Rennó, L. R. (2020). The Bolsonaro Voter: Issue Positions and Vote Choice in the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Elections. Latin American Politics and Society, 62(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2020.13
Robinson, J. A., & Verdier, T. (2013). The Political Economy of Clientelism. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115(2), 260–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12010
Rozo, S. V., & Vargas, J. F. (2021). Brothers or invaders? How crisis-driven migrants shape voting behavior. Journal of Development Economics, 150, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2021.102636
Santiago, E. (2024, January 22). President jokowi distributes rice bansos in salatiga. https://indonesiapersada.id/berita/detail/presiden-jokowi-bagikan-bansos-beras-di-salatiga
Shin, J. H. (2015). Voter demands for patronage: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800004197
Singgih, V. (2024, January 30). The politicization of social assistance is considered to be increasingly massive ahead of the 2024 presidential election-“Bawaslu has given an appeal to the president.” https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/ cpw7enedn39o
Suwiknyo, E. (2024, January 23). Ganjar Campaign in Central Java, Jokowi Distributes Social Assistance in Kandang Banteng. https://kabar24.bisnis.com/ read/20240123/15/1734649/ganjar-kampanye-di-jateng-jokowi-bagi-bagi- bansos-di-kandang-banteng
Taher, A. P. (2024, February 18). The Jokowi Effect is Definitely in Prabowo-Gibran’s Victory. https://tirto.id/jokowi-effect-sudah-pasti-ada-di-kemenangan-prabowo-gibran-gV2y
Utama, F. A. (2024, February 18). Eep Saefulloh Touches on Swelling Social Assistance Funds: Ruler’s Method to Win Candidates. https://www.inews.id/news/nasional/eep-saefulloh-singgung-dana-bansos-membengkak-modus-penguasa-menangkan-calon
Virananda, I. G. S., Dartanto, T., & Wijaya, B. D. (2021). Does Money Matter for Electability? Lesson Learned From the 2014 Legislative Election in Indonesia. SAGE Open, 11(4), 1–2. https ://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054492
Wahyuni, N. (2024, January 9). Jokowi Distributes Social Assistance in Front of the Prabowo-Gibran Banner. https://bacapesan.fajar.co.id/2024/01/09/jokowi-bagi-bagi-bansos-di-depan-spanduk-prabowo-gibran/
Wijaya, Y. S. (2024, January 31). Jokowi’s “Tahu Bulat” Social Assistance during the Presidential Election Campaign for Whom?". https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ ekonomi/20240131063721-532-1056475/bansos-tahu-bulat-jokowi-di-masa-kampanye-pilpres-untuk-siapa.
Winters, J. A. (2016). Electoral Dynamics in Indonesia: Money Politics, Patronage and Clientelism at the Grassroots. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(3), 407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2016.1236653
Yuda, T. K. (2021). The complementary roles between clientelism and familism in social policy development. Social Policy & Administration, 55(7), 1370–1371. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12738
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.94625
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 1509
| 
views : 522
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Early View :
 | Online Version of Record before inclusion in an issue
|