Melengkapi Analisa Teori Akses dengan Pendekatan Kolaboratif pada Konteks Program Perhutanan Sosial: Studi Kasus Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan (LMDH) Rawa Sakti, Pemalang

https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.v11i2.65519

Dicky Rachmawan(1*), Francisia Saveria Sika Ery Seda(2), Robert Siburian(3)

(1) Mahasiswa Magister Sosiologi FISIP UI Pusat Penelitian Masyarakat dan Budaya - Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI)
(2) Departemen Sosiologi FISIP UI
(3) Pusat Penelitian Masyarakat dan Budaya - Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI)
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The shift of the forest management paradigm in Indonesia in this recent time has given more space for people that align with the Indonesian Government to elevate well-being at once to conserve forest through Social Forestry Program. One model group from 6.411 forest communities that manage forest is Forest Village Communuty or Lembaga Masyaraakat Desa Hutan (LMDH) of Rawa Sakti. This paper aims to describe the structure-process of social forestry program implementation in LMDH Rawa Sakti which uses access theory that is complemented by the collaborative approach. The qualitative approach with descriptive analysis in the case study is conducted through depth interviews (consist of the management and members of LMDH Rawa Sakti, middleman, village officer, and coffee entrepreneur), observation, and focus group discussion. The result shows that negotiation and social relation access is the essential access that can influence five other forms of SRAM by Theory of Access that need to be examined by the collaborative approach elements, especially at accountability, communication, involvement, and equity to identify elite capture. In the end, the elite capture causes a lack of contribution and cooperation as a group to achieve social forestry program goal.

Keywords


Access Theory; Collaborative Approach; Social Forestry; LMDH Rawa Sakti.

Full Text:

PDF


References

Asmin, F., Darusman, D., Ichwandi, I., & Suharjito, D. (2019). Mainstreaming community-based forest management in west sumatra: Social forestry arguments, support, and implementation. Forest and Society, 3(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.24259/ fs.v3i1.4047

BPS. (2020). Identifikasi dan Analisis Desa di Sekitar Kawasan Hutan Berbasis Spasial tahun 2019. BPS. https://www.bps.go.id/ publi[1]cation/download. html? nrbvfeve =Zwu5mjvkm2nkzwjkmzg5 Mjk5yzhkztc4&Xzmn=Ahr0c h m 6 l y 9 3 d 3 c u y n b z l m d v l Mlkl3b1ymxpy2f0aw9ulziw Mjavmdyvmjkvzwu5mjvkm2n Kzwjkmzg5mjk5yzhkztc4l2 l k z w 5 0 a w z p a 2 f z a s 1 k y w 4 t Yw5hbglzaxm Tzgvzys1kas1zz Wtpdgfyl Wthd2fzyw4t.

DS, P. (2020). Kualitas Perhutanan Sosial. Agroindonesia. http:// agroindonesia.co.id/2020/04/ kualitas-perhutanan-sosial/.

Essougong, U. P. K., Foundjem Tita, D., & Minang, P. A. (2019). Addressing equity in community forestry: Lessons from 20 years of implementation in cameroon. Ecology and Society, 24(1). https://doi. org/10.5751/ES-10656-240109.

Firdaus, Y. A. (2018). Panduan Praktis Penerapan Kebijakan Perhutanan Sosial. Panduan Praktis Penerapan Kebijakan Perhutanan Sosial. https:// doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006856 56 Kawistara, Vol. 11, No. 2, 22 Agustus 2021: 42-59.

Fisher, M. R., Moeliono, M., Mulyana, A., Yuliani, E. L., Adriadi, A., Kamaluddin, Judda, J., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2018). Assessing the New Social Forestry Project in Indonesia: Recognition, Livelihood and Conservation? International Forestry Review, 20(3), 346-361. https://doi. org/10.1505/146554818824063014.

García-López, G. A., & Antinori, C. (2018). Between Grassroots Collective Action and State Mandates: The Hybridity of Multi-Level Forest Associations in Mexico. Conservation and Society, 16(2), 193-204. https:// doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_16_115.

Hidayat, H. (2015). Pengelolaan Hutan Lestari: Partisipasi, Kolaborasi dan Konflik (H. Hidayat (ed.)). Yayasan Pustaka Obor.

Kaskoyo, H., Mohammed, A. J., & Inoue, M. (2017). Impact of community forest program in protection forest on livelihood outcomes: A case study of Lampung Province, Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 36(3), 250-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10 549811.2017.1296774.

Kelly, E. C. (2018). The Role of the Local Community on Federal Lands: the Weaverville Community Forest. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 15(40), 163-177. https://www.jstor. org/stable/10.2307/90023270.

Kuncoro, M., & Cahyani, D. (2018). Performance of social forestry on farmers’ revenues: lessons from Yogyakarta and Lampung, Indonesia. The Business & Management Review, 9(4), 275-289.

Massiri, S. D., Malik, A., Golar, Hamzari, & Nugroho, B. (2020). Institutional capacity of forest management unit in promoting sustainable communitybased forest management. Case study of forest management unit in central sulawesi province, Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 26(2), 169-177. https://doi. org/10.7226/JTFM.26.2.169.

Moeliono, M., Thuy, P. T., Bong, I. W., Wong, G. Y., & Brockhaus, M. (2017). Social forestry-why and for whom? A comparison of policies in vietnam and Indonesia. Forest and Society, 1(2), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.24259/ fs.v1i2.2484.

Mohammed, A. J., Inoue, M., & Shivakoti, G. (2017). Moving forward in collaborative forest management: Role of external actors for sustainable Forest socio-ecological systems. Forest Policy and Economics, 74, 13- 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. forpol.2016.10.010.

Myers, R., & Hansen, C. P. (2020). Revisiting A Theory of Access: A review. Society and Natural Resources, 33(2), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2 018.1560522.

Nath, T. K., Jashimuddin, M., & Inoue, M. (2016). Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM) in Bangladesh. In World Forests (Vol. 22, Issue August 2018). https://www.tandfonline. com/doi/full/10.1080/10549811.20 16.1231615.

Noveria, M., Mashudi, Gayatri, I. H., & Mulyani, L. (2005). Hutan, Masyarakat dan Pasar: Usulan Perubahan Paradigma dan Reformasi Kebijakan Sumber Daya Hutan. LIPI Press. http://penerbit. lipi.go.id/penerbitan.cgi?daftar&11 07298611&9951&&semua.

Nurrochmat, D. R., Massijaya, M. Y., Jaya, I. N. S., Abdulah, L., Ekayani, M., Astuti, E. W., & Erbaugh, J. T. (2019). Promoting community forestry to reduce deforestation surrounding Gunung Rinjani National Park in Central Lombok, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 285(1). 57 Dicky Rachmawan Melengkapi Analisa Teori Akses dengan Pendekatan Kolaboratif pada Konteks Program Perhutanan Sosial: Studi Kasus Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan... https://doi.org/10.1088/1755- 1315/285/1/012014

Pambudi, A. S. (2020). The Development of Social Forestry in Indonesia: The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning, 1(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep. v1i1.11.

Peluso, N. L., & Ribot, J. (2020). Postscript: A Theory of Access Revisited. Society and Natural Resources, 33(2), 300-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2 019.1709929.

Pujo, Sofhani, T. F., Gunawan, B., & Syamsudin, T. S. (2018). Community capacity building in social forestry development: A review. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 29(2), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.5614/ jrcp.2018.29.2.3.

Qurniati, R., Darmawan, A., Utama, R. B., & Inoue, M. (2019). Poverty distribution of different types of forest-related communities: Case study in Wan Abdul Rachman forest park and mangrove forest in Sidodadi Village, Lampung Province, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 20(11), 3153-3163. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/ d201107.

Rachmawan, D. (2020). Focus Group Discussion dengan KLHK.

Rakatama, A., & Pandit, R. (2020). Reviewing social forestry schemes in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges. Forest Policy and Economics, 111(1), 102052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. forpol.2019.102052.

Ribot, Jesse, C., & Peluso, Nancy, L. (2003). A Theory of Access *. Rural Sociology, 68(2), 153-181.

Royer, S. De, Noordwijk, M. Van, & Roshetko, J. M. (2018). Does communitybased forest management in Indonesia devolve social justice or social costs? International Forestry Review, 20(2), 167-180. https://doi. org/10.1505/146554818823767609.

Santika, T., Wilson, K. A., Budiharta, S., Kusworo, A., Meijaard, E., Law, E. A., Friedman, R., Hutabarat, J. A., Indrawan, T. P., St. John, F. A. V., & Struebig, M. J. (2019). Heterogeneous impacts of community forestry on forest conservation and poverty alleviation: Evidence from Indonesia. People and Nature, 1(2), 204-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.25.

Sardjono, M. A., & Inoue, M. (2017). Collaborative Governance of Forest Resources in Indonesia: Giving Over Managerial Authority to Decision Makers on the Sites. In Redefining Diversity and Dynamics of Natural Resources Management in Asia (Vol. 1, Issue 2013). Elsevier Inc. https:// doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805454- 3.00011-6.

Setiajiati, F., Karyaatmadja, B., Sutedja, I., Kuswondho, H., Satria, P., Sejati, & Maharani, R. S. (2019). Lesson Learned from Social Forestry Practice in a Forest and Climate Change Project in Kalimantan, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 363(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755- 1315/363/1/012001.

Shohibuddin, M. (2018). Perspektif Agraria Kritis: Teori, Kebijakan dan Kajian Empiris. March, lxiv + 233.

Suparno, R., Nurbaiti, A., Afiff, S., Tarmizi, H., Mariani, E., & Sastriastanti, F. (2018). Toward Just and Sustainable Forestry in Indonesia. In R. Suparno & A. Nurbaiti (Eds.), Riyadi Suparno Ati Nurbaiti Suraya Afiff Hendarsyah Tarmizi Evi Mariani Fidelis Sastriastanti. The Jakarta Post Publishing. http://silk.dephut. go.id/app/Upload/repos/201906 25/2b5976ba1ae096fb4ac1fd33bce5 be00.pdf 58 Kawistara, Vol. 11, No. 2, 22 Agustus 2021: 42-59.

Susilo, Y. S., & Nairobi. (2019). Dampak Perhutanan Sosial Terhadap Pendapatan Masyarakat (The Impact of Social Forestry on Community Incomes). Jurnal ISEI Economic Review, III(1), 16-27.

UNESA. (2019). UN Strategic Plan for Forests 2030. Voo, P., Mohammed, A. J., & Inoue, M. (2016). Community Use Zone (CUZ) Model and Its Outcome in Malaysia Case Study from Crocker Range Park, Sabah. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 6(3), 25. https:// doi.org/10.5539/jms.v6n3p25.

Weissberg, L. M., Kusel, J. P., & Rodger, K. A. (2018). From conflict to collaboration. Humboldt Journal of Social Relation, 40(40), 178-190. https://www.jstor. org/stable/10.2307/90023271.

Wright, G. D., Andersson, K. P., Gibson, C. C., & Evans, T. P. (2016). Decentralization can help reduce deforestation when user groups engage with local government. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(52), 14958-14963. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1610650114.

Wulandari, C., & Inoue, M. (2018). The Importance of Social Learning for the Development of Community Based Forest Management in Indonesia: The Case of Community Forestry in Lampung Province. Small-Scale Forestry, 17(3), 361-376. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11842-018-9392-7.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.v11i2.65519

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1468 | views : 1607

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2021 Dicky Rachmawan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Kawistara is published by the Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada.