First-Person Pronouns as Authorial Presence in Research Articles: A Cross-Linguistics Study of English and Indonesian

Tsabita Intan Tsaqifa; Shafira Rahmasari

doi:10.22146/lexicon.v12i1.103704

First-Person Pronouns as Authorial Presence in Research Articles: A Cross-Linguistics Study of English and Indonesian

https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v12i1.103704

Tsabita Intan Tsaqifa^(1*), Shafira Rahmasari⁽²⁾

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This paper is a corpus-based study that attempts to examine how first-person pronouns are used in English research articles in comparison to Indonesian research articles in the field of linguistics since Indonesian writers tend to avoid the use of first-person pronouns in academic writing. This study intends to identify the types of first-person pronouns used to express authorial presence in English and Indonesian research articles. It also explores the discourse functions of first-person pronouns that serve in English and Indonesian research articles. The source of the data consists of 40 research articles that are collected from reputable journals and analyzed using AntConc. This study employs the categorization of discourse functions proposed by Hyland (2002). The results show that I, my, me, we, our, us, and the author(s) are employed by the English authors and kami, penulis, and peneliti are used by the Indonesian authors. The pronoun we is the most frequently used by both English and Indonesian authors. The English authors tend to use the pronoun I rather than the Indonesian authors. The Indonesian authors hide themselves in the phrases of the author(s) and the researcher(s). In addition, the results also identify that these first-person pronouns serve discourse functions in research articles.

Keywords

Academic Writing; Authorial Presence; Discourse Functions; First-Person Pronouns; Research Articles

References

Anthony, L. (2023). AntConc (Version 4.2.4) [Computer software]. Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software

Asprillia, A., & Hardjanto, T. D. (2020). Who Am I in Academic Writing?: The Study of Authorial Identity. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 23(1), Article 1. 131-143. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v23i1.2481

Azar, A. S., & Hashim, A. (2022). Analysing authorial identity construction in the review article genre in Applied Linguistics. Studies in English Language and Education, 9(1), Article 1. 94-114. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v9i1.21898

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Pearson Education Limited.

Cheung, Y. L., & Lau, L. (2020). Authorial voice in academic writing: A comparative study of journal articles in English Literature and Computer Science. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Authorial-voice-in-academic-writing%3A-A-comparative-Cheung-Lau/5e5b551f26120ce35aa4ec938005c6dd16fbdcc2

Dontcheva-Navrátilová, O. (2013). Authorial presence in academic discourse: Functions of author-reference pronouns. Linguistica Pragensia, 23(1), 9–30.

Grigoriev, I., & Sokolova, A. (2019). Corpus Based Analysis of First-Person Pronouns in Research Proposal Written by Rusian Students. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 0, Article 0. 423-430. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP1904423G

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed). Arnold ; Distributed in the United States of America by Oxford University Press.

Hardjanto, T. D. (2022). “However, we argue that ...”: The Construction of Authorial Identities in English Research Articles. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(8), Article 8. 1525-1536. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1208.08

Hartwell, L., & Jacques, M.-P. (2014). Authorial Presence in French and English: “Pronoun + Verb” Patterns in Biology and Medicine Research Articles. Discours, 15. https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.8941

Hryniuk, K. (2018). Expressing authorial self in research articles written by Polish and English native-speaker writers: A corpus-based study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(3), Article 3. 621-642. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.3.5

Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530

Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0

Hyland, K. (2002). Academic Argument: Induction or Interaction? https://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/29774

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

Hyland, K. (2008). Disciplinary voices: Interactions in research writing. English Text Construction, 1(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.1.1.03hyl

Işık-Taş, E. E. (2018). Authorial identity in Turkish language and English language research articles in Sociology: The role of publication context in academic writers’ discourse choices. English for Specific Purposes, 49, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.10.003

Isler, C. (2018). The Use of First Person Pronouns in Masterâ€TMs Theses Written in English by Turkish Authors. JELE (Journal of English Language and Education), 4(1), Article 1. 12-20. https://doi.org/10.26486/jele.v4i1.382

Ivanic, R. (1994). I Is for Interpersonal: Discoursal Construction of Writer Identities and the Teaching of Writing. Linguistics and Education, 6(1), 3–15.

Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and Identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5

Januarto, A., & Hardjanto, T. D. (2020). Authorial Presence in English Research Articles by Native and Non-Native English Scholars. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 23(2), Article 2. 241-254. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v23i2.2473

Jasim Al-Shujairi, Y. B. (2020). What, which and where: Examining self-mention markers in ISI and Iraqi local research articles in applied linguistics. Asian Englishes, 22(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2018.1544699

John, S., & Tang, R. (1999). The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18(Supplement 1), S23–S39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5

Kuo, C.-H. (1999). The Use of Personal Pronouns: Role Relationships in Scientific Journal Articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6

Li, Z. (2021). Authorial presence in research article abstracts: A diachronic investigation of the use of first person pronouns. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 100977. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100977

Liu, S. (2011). Self-mention and authorial identity construction in Chinese and English research article abstracts. Contemp Rhet, 166(4), 85–88.

McEnery, T., & Wilson, A. (2001). Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press.

Munoz, M. C. (2013). The “I” in interaction: Authorial presense in academic writing. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 8, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2013.1162

Poudat, C., & Loiseau, S. (2005). Authorial presence in academic genres. In E. Tognini-Bonelli & G. Del Lungo Camiciotti (Eds.), Studies in Corpus Linguistics (Vol. 19, pp. 51–68). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.19.05pou

Scheibman, J. (2004). Inclusive and Exclusive Patterning of the English First Person Plural: Evidence from Conversation.

Solsun, A., & Akbaş, E. (2022). Establishing authorial presence by the exclusive-we: A functional approach to self-mentions in engineering research articles. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), Article 3. 281-295. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.66.9.3

Walková, M. (2018). Author's Self-Representation in Research Articles by Anglophone and Slovak Linguist. Discourse and Interaction, 11(1), Article 1. 86-105. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2018-1-86

Wang, H., & Hu, Z. (2023). Changes in the ways authors refer to themselves: A diachronic study of self-mention in English research articles. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), Article 1. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02099-7

Wang, S., Tseng, W.-T., & Johanson, R. (2021). To We or Not to We: Corpus-Based Research on First-Person Pronoun Use in Abstracts and Conclusions. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211008893. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211008893

Yuliawati, S., Mawarrani, E., & Kurniawan, E. (2023). A corpus-based study of authorial identity in Indonesian writers’ research articles. 44, 959–964. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2023.44.3.34

Zhao, N. (2023). A corpus-based comparison study of first-person pronoun we in English-language abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 63, 101244. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v12i1.103704