Email this article 
Reflexive Personal Metadiscourse in Research Articles on Language Learning: A Discourse Analysis
https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v3i1.42104 Lukas Nugroho Tjioe(1*)
(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This research attempts to identify the functions of reflexive personal metadiscourse in research articles on language learning. Data for this research were taken from 17 research articles, totaling 177,309 words, published in Language Learning and Technology, an online refereed journal of language learning and technology. In total, 66 instances of reflexive personal metadiscourse were found serving 16 different functions. 93.94% of the instances commented on the on-going text, while 6.06% established interaction between the writer and the audience. The small number of occurrences of personal metadiscourse, though having various functionalities, has yet to gain considerable favor in academic writing.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adel, A. & Mauranen, A. 2010. “Metadiscourse: Diverse and Divided Perspectives” in Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 1-11.
Adel, A. 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Adel, A. 2010. “Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A Taxonomy of Metadiscourse in Spoken and Written Academic English” in Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 69-97.
Amiryousefi, M. & Rasekh. A. E. 2010. “Metadiscourse: Definitions, Issues and Its Implications for English Teachers” in English Language Teaching, 3(4),159-167.
Beauvais, P. J. 1989. “A Speech Act Theory of Metadiscourse” in Written Communication, 6(1), 11-30
Camiciottoli, B. C. 2003. “Metadiscourse and ESP reading comprehension: An exploratory study” in Reading in a Foreign Language, 15(1), 28-44.
Cao, F. & Hu, G. 2014. “Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences” Journal of Pragmatics, 66, 15-31.
Cheng, X. & Steffensen, M. S. 1996. “Metadiscourse: A Technique for Improving Student Writing” in Research in the Teaching of English, 30(2), 149-181.
Dahl, T. 2004. “Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline?” in Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807–1825.
Duszak, A. & Lewkowicz, J. 2008. “Publishing Academic Texts in English: A Polish Perspective” in Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 108–120.
Ebrahimi, S. J. & Ebrahimi, S. F. 2012. “Audience Interaction in Iranian English Newspaper” in Advances in English Linguistics, 1(4), 91-94.
Godó Ágnes, M. 2011. “Are you with me? A Metadiscursive Analysis of Interactive Strategies in College Students‟ Course Presentations” in International Journal of English Studies, 2(1), 55-78.
Hyland, K. 1998. “Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Discourse” in Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437–455.
Hyland, K. 1998a. “Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO‟s letter” in Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224–245.
Hyland, K. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
Jakobson, R. 1998. On Language: Roman Jakobson, eds. L. R. Waugh & M.Monville-Burston. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Luukka, M. 1994. “Metadiscourse in Academic Texts” in eds. B. L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, & B. Nordberg, Text and Talk in Professional Contexts. Selected Papers from the International Conference “Discourse and the Professions,” Uppsala, 26–29 August, 1992." Uppsala: ASLA, The Swedish Association of Applied Linguistics.
Massaabi, A. 2014. “Metadiscourse and Reading Research Articles RA in English by Tunisian Geography Faculty” in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1110 – 1118.
Mauranen, A. 1993. Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Mauranen, A. 1993a. “Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts” in English for Specific Purposes, 12, 3–22.
Pérez, M. A. & Maciá, E. A. 2002. “Metadiscourse in lecture comprehension: Does it really help foreign language learners?” in ATLANTIS, XXIV(2), 3-21.
Pérez-Llantada, C. 2007. “Native and Non-native English Scholars Publishing Research Internationally: a Small-scale Study on Authorial Invisibility” in Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 217–238.
Pérez-Llantada, C. 2010. “The Discourse Functions of Metadiscourse in Published Academic Writing: Issues of Culture and Language” in Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 41-68.
Schiffrin, D. 1980. “Metatalk: Organizational and Evaluative Brackets in Discourse” in Sociological Inquiry: Language and Social Interaction, 50, 199–236.
Salek, M. 2004. “A Diagram of Interactive and Interactional Markers in Different Parts of English Research Articles” in Journal of Language Sciences and Linguistics, 2(3), 55-66.
Vande Kopple, W. J. 1985. “Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse” in College Composition and Communication, 26, 82–93.
Vande Kopple, W. J. 1988. “Metadiscourse and the Recall of Modality Markers” in Visible Language, XXII, 233–272.
Vassileva, I. 2000. Who is the Author? A Contrastive Analysis of Authorial Presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian Academic Discourse. Sankt Augustin: Asgard Verlag.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v3i1.42104
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 980
| 
views : 1534
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2014 Lukas Nugroho Tjioe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Lexicon Office
| English Department Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada Soegondo Building, 3rd Floor, Room 306 Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281 Telephone: +62 274 513096 Email: lexicon.fib@ugm.ac.id ISSN: 2746-2668 (Online) |
 LEXICON is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. |
Lexicon is indexed in
