A Gender-based Study of Apology Strategies Employed by Indonesian Students

https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v8i1.65770

Sandyarini Melati Irawan(1), Tofan Dwi Hardjanto(2*)

(1) English Department, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) English Department, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study investigates the apology strategies used by Indonesian university students and examines whether there is any gender difference in the apologies made by these students. The data were collected using Discourse Completion Task (DCT) containing eight situations. The DCT was distributed to 42 English Department students comprising 21 female students and 21 male students. Altogether, 336 apology utterances were collected. The results showed that the students most frequently used a combination of apology strategies (68.4%), especially a combination of Illocutionary Force Indicating Device (IFID) and Explanation or Account of Cause (EoC). Furthermore, there seems to be no difference in the types of strategies used by female and students. Both groups tended to use a combination strategies and IFID. However, in terms of intensity, female students tended to apologize more intensely than the males and this was evident from their more frequent use of apology intensifications.

Keywords


apology; apology strategies; DCT; gender difference; speech act.

Full Text:

PDF


References

Abdolmalaki, S. G., & Ghani, C. A. A. (2016). The Use of Apology Strategies and Gender Differences Among Iranian EFL Postgraduate Students in an ESL Context. Journal of Language and Communication, 3 (2), 235-243.

Astuti, A. N. (2016). Degree of Formality of Apology Expressions Used in Short Message by English Department Students. (Unpublished graduation paper). Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain E. (1984). Request and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5 (3), 196-213.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, A.D., & Olshtain, E. (1981). Developing a measure of sociocultural competence: The case of apology. Language Learning, 31 (1), 113-134.

Harb, M. A. (2016). Of Gender and Apology Strategies: The Case of Arabic. De Gruyter Open, 224-265.

Holmes, J. (1989). Sex Differences in Apologies: One Aspect of Communicative Competence. Applied Linguistics, 10 (2), 194-213.

Holmes, J. (1995). Women, Men and Politeness. NY, New York: Routledge.

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman’s place. Language in Society, 2 (1), 45-80.

Nisa, I. K. (2018). Apology Strategies in “Harry Potter” Movie Series. (Unpublished graduation paper). Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Putri, A. C. A. (2017). Apology Strategies Used by the English Department Students of Universitas Gadjah Mada. (Unpublished graduation paper). Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v8i1.65770

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 948 | views : 714

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Sandyarini Melati Irawan, Tofan Dwi Hardjanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Lexicon Office

English Department
Faculty of Cultural Sciences,
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Soegondo Building, 3rd Floor, Room 306
Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281
Telephone: +62 274 513096
Email: lexicon.fib@ugm.ac.id

ISSN: 2746-2668 (Online)

Web Analytics View Stats

Creative Commons License
LEXICON is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lexicon is indexed in

 

About UsSubmissionIssuePoliciesReview