Authorial Presence in English Research Articles in Medicine Written by American and Indonesian Authors

https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v11i1.65924

Tsabita Intan Tsaqifa(1*), Tofan Dwi Hardjanto(2)

(1) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The present research attempts to investigate authorial presence in English research articles in medicine written by American and Indonesian authors. In doing so, the study first attempts to describe first-person pronouns used to express authorial presence. Secondly, the research aims to examine the discourse functions of first-person pronouns in the research articles. Data for the present research were taken from 20 English research articles in medicine, consisting of 10 articles published in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (Wiley) and 10 in Medical Journal of Indonesia. A corpus of 81,657 words was analyzed with the help of a concordance program, WordSmith Tools 5.0 (Scott, 2008), to identify the occurrences of first-person pronouns used in research articles. A qualitative analysis was also conducted to examine the discourse functions of each first-person pronoun using the classification proposed by Filimonova (2005) and Tang and John (1999). Hopefully, the present research findings could indicate the intention of authorial presence in academic writing, specifically in medical research articles. The findings also contribute to investigating the difference between American and Indonesian authors in presenting themselves in academic writing.


Keywords


authorial presence; academic writing; concordance; discourse functions; research articles

Full Text:

PDF


References

Chavez Munoz, M. (2013). The “I” in interaction: Authorial presense in academic writing. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 8(0). https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2013.1162

Dontcheva-Navrátilová, O. (2013). Authorial presence in academic discourse: functions of author-reference pronouns. Linguistica Pragnensia, 3(1), 9–30.

Filimonova, E. (2005). Clusivity cross-linguistically: Common trends and possible patterns. In E. Filimonova (Ed.), Clusivity: Typology and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction (Vol. 63, pp. 399–424). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Hartwell, L., & Jacques, M.-P. (2014). Authorial Presence in French and English: “Pronoun + Verb” Patterns in Biology and Medicine Research Articles. Discours, 15. https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.8941

Harwood, N. (2005a). ‘I hoped to counteract the memory problem, but I made no impact whatsoever’: discussing methods in computing science using I. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.10.002

Harwood, N. (2005b). ‘We Do Not Seem to Have a Theory … The Theory I Present Here Attempts to Fill This Gap’: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing. Applied Linguistics, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami012

Hryniuk, K. (2018). Expressing authorial self in research articles written by Polish and English native-speaker writers: A corpus-based study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.3.5

Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 207–226.

Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091–1112.

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365

IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (25.0). IBM Corp.

Kim, E. (2015). Quantitative Evidence on the Uses of the First Person Pronoun (I and We) in Journal Paper Abstracts. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.1.227

Kuo, C.-H. (1999). The Use of Personal Pronouns: Role Relationships in Scientific Journal Articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 121–138.

Poudat, C., & Loiseau, S. (2005). Authorial presence in academic genres. In E. Tognini-Bonelli & G. del Lungo Camiciotti (Eds.), Strategies in Academic Discourse (Eds., pp. 51–68). John Benjamins.

Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith Tools (5.0). Lexical Analysis Software.

Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The “I” in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18, S23–S39.

Vassileva, I. (1998). Who am I/who are we in academic writing? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 163–190.

Vladimirou, D. (2007). “I suggest that we need more research”: Personal reference in linguistics journal articles. In C. Gabrielatos, R. Slessor, & J.W. Unger (Eds.), Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching (pp. 139-157). Lancaster University.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v11i1.65924

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 572 | views : 272

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Tsabita Intan Tsaqifa, Tofan Dwi Hardjanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Lexicon Office

English Department
Faculty of Cultural Sciences,
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Soegondo Building, 3rd Floor, Room 306
Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281
Telephone: +62 274 513096
Email: lexicon.fib@ugm.ac.id

ISSN: 2746-2668 (Online)

Web Analytics View Stats

Creative Commons License
LEXICON is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lexicon is indexed in

 

About UsSubmissionIssuePoliciesReview