The Violation of Conversational Maxims in the Movie Series Divergent

https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v7i2.66572

Adelia Fatmawati Pradani(1), Thomas Joko Priyo Sembodo(2*)

(1) English Department, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) English Department, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This research focuses on identifying the types of conversational maxims violated by the characters in a feature film trilogy entitled The Divergent Series. This research also aims to explain the functions of the violation of conversational maxims in the series. The result shows that there are 100 violations of conversational maxim in Divergent series, and among those, there are 43 violations of maxim of relevance (43%), which is the most frequently occurred in the movie. The second violation identified is the violation of maxim of manner, which reaches 24 violations (24%), and the third frequently occurring violation is violations of maxim of quantity with 22 numbers of violation (22%)/. The least occurring violation found in the movie is violation of  maxim of quality, which reaches 11 numbers of violation (11%). There are several functions of the violation of conversational maxim found in the movie: keeping a secret, concealing half of the information, avoiding certain topic/question, and confusing the hearer.

Keywords


Divergent; Insurgent; Allegiant; cooperative principle; conversational maxims; violation of conversational maxims

Full Text:

PDF


References

Allegiant. (2016, March 09). Retrieved January 3, 2019, from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3410834/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1.

Attardo, S. (1993). Violation of conversational maxims and cooperation: The case of jokes. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(6), 537-558. DOI:10.1016/0378-2166(93)90111-2.

Brown, G., & Yule G. (1984). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Burger, N. (Director). (2014). Divergent [Video file]. United States: Lionsgate. Retrieved January 3, 2019, from https://www.netflix.com/watch/70293461?trackId=13752289&tctx=0,0,d2b03e331a6863d1ebc3cc381a73dcc5f40cd594:9f40983d7c41c49e7be2fa12e6d8ae106c7fb6ec.

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. Routledge.

Divergent. (2014, March 20). Retrieved January 3, 2019, from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1840309/?ref_=ttspec_ql.

Dornerus, E. (2005). Breaking Maxims in Conversation: A Comparative Study of How Scriptwriters Break Maxims in Desperate Housewives and That 70’s Show. Karlstads: Karlstads University.

Ephratt, M. (2012). “We try harder” – Silence and Grice’s cooperative principle, maxims and implicatures. Language & Communication, 32(1), 62-79. DOI:10.1016/j.langcom.2011.09.001.

Grice, P. (1975). Logic and Conversation.In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics (pp. 41-58). Academic Press.

Insurgent. (2015, March 18). Retrieved January 3, 2019, from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2908446/?ref_=nv_sr_1?ref_.

Mey, J. (2011). Pragmatics: An introduction. Blackwell.

Mustikawati, K. (2016). The Violation of Conversational Maxim and its Implicature in the Movie of Tomorrowland . (Unpublished Master's thesis). Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Nayadheyu, N. N. (2016). The Flouting of Conversational Maxims in Gossip Girl TV Series. (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Pan, W. (2012). Linguistic basis of humor in uses of Grice’s cooperative principle. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 1(6), 20-25. DOI:10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.6p.20.

Qassemi, M., Ziabari, R. & Kheirabadi. R. (2018). Grice‟s Cooperative Principles in News Reports of Tehran Times- A Descriptive-Analytical Study. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies. 6(1), 66-74.

Schwentke, R. (Director). (2015). Insurgent [Video file]. United States: Lionsgate. Retrieved January 4, 2019, from https://www.netflix.com/watch/80018211?trackId=13752289&tctx=0,1,d2b03e331a6863d1ebc3cc381a73dcc5f40cd594:9f40983d7c41c49e7be2fa12e6d8ae106c7fb6ec.

Schwentke, R. (Director). (2016). Allegiant[Video file]. United States: Lionsgate. Retrieved January 5, 2019, from https://www.netflix.com/watch/80081226?trackId=13752289&tctx=0,2,d2b03e331a6863d1ebc3cc381a73dcc5f40cd594:9f40983d7c41c49e7be2fa12e6d8ae106c7fb6ec.

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Routledge.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v7i2.66572

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 4302 | views : 3347

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Adelia Fatmawati Pradani, Thomas Joko Priyo Sembodo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lexicon Office

English Department
Faculty of Cultural Sciences,
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Soegondo Building, 3rd Floor, Room 306
Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281
Telephone: +62 274 513096
Email: lexicon.fib@ugm.ac.id

ISSN: 2746-2668 (Online)

Web Analytics View Stats

Creative Commons License
LEXICON is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lexicon is indexed in

 
About UsSubmissionIssuePoliciesReview
Editorial Team
Journal History
Contact
Author Guidelines
Article Submission
Account Registration
Current Issue
All Issues
Upcoming Issue
Privacy Statement
Open Access
Publication Ethics
Review Process
Peer Reviewers
Reviewer Guidelines