Computational Design and Evaluation of Modified AEW-1 Chalcone Derivatives as Potential Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Fitriana Nur Hanifah(1), Ratna Asmah Susidarti(2*), Niko Prasetyo(3)
(1) Master Program of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Long-term therapy of inflammation is limited by gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and renal side effects, motivating the search for safer, multi-target anti-inflammatory agents. The chalcone derivative AEW-1, which exhibits in vivo anti-inflammatory activity comparable to ibuprofen, was selected for rational optimization. Three new AEW-1 derivatives were designed by introducing trihydroxy substitutions on the A ring and evaluated in silico using target prediction, molecular docking, and pharmacokinetic/drug-likeness prediction. Target prediction indicated iNOS as the most probable target for AEW-1 and all its derivatives, supporting iNOS as an additional anti-inflammatory target alongside COX-2. For docking to COX-2, compound 1 exhibited the best binding profile and showed a binding affinity comparable to that of the native ligand, with key interactions involving Ser530. For docking to iNOS, compound 1 also demonstrated the most favorable profile among the derivatives and formed a hydrogen bond with Glu377, a key residue. However, its binding affinity was lower than that of the native ligand. All AEW-1 derivatives satisfied drug-likeness criteria and exhibited improved pharmacokinetic profiles compared to AEW-1. Overall, compound 1, consistent with the 2,4,6-trihydroxy substitution pattern, emerged as the most promising candidate as a dual COX-2/iNOS inhibitor, warranting further validation through molecular dynamics simulations and in vitro enzyme inhibition assays.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Cole, J. C., Murray, C. W., Nissink, J. W. M., Taylor, R. D., & Taylor, R. (2005). Comparing protein–ligand docking programs is difficult. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 60(3), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/PROT.20497
Cramer, J., Sager, C. P., & Ernst, B. (2019). Hydroxyl Groups in Synthetic and Natural-Product-Derived Therapeutics: A Perspective on a Common Functional Group. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 62(20), 8915–8930. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JMEDCHEM.9B00179
Curtis, E., Fuggle, N., Shaw, S., Spooner, L., Ntani, G., Parsons, C., Corp, N., Honvo, G., Baird, J., Maggi, S., Dennison, E., Bruyère, O., Reginster, J. Y., & Cooper, C. (2019). Safety of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors in Osteoarthritis: Outcomes of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Drugs and Aging, 36(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40266-019-00664-X/FIGURES/1
DuBois, R. N., Abramson, S. B., Crofford, L., Gupta, R. A., Simon, L. S., Putte, L. B. A. van de, & Lipsky, P. E. (1998). Cyclooxygenase in biology and disease. The FASEB Journal, 12(12), 1063–1073. https://doi.org/10.1096/FASEBJ.12.12.1063
Garcin, E. D., Arvai, A. S., Rosenfeld, R. J., Kroeger, M. D., Crane, B. R., Andersson, G., Andrews, G., Hamley, P. J., Mallinder, P. R., Nicholls, D. J., St-Gallay, S. A., Tinker, A. C., Gensmantel, N. P., Mete, A., Cheshire, D. R., Connolly, S., Stuehr, D. J., Åberg, A., Wallace, A. V., … Getzoff, E. D. (2008). Anchored plasticity opens doors for selective inhibitor design in nitric oxide synthase. Nature Chemical Biology 2008 4:11, 4(11), 700–707. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.115
Mahapatra, D. K., Bharti, S. K., & Asati, V. (2017). Chalcone Derivatives: Anti-inflammatory Potential and Molecular Targets Perspectives. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 17(28), 3146–3169. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026617666170914160446
Mahboubi-Rabbani, M., Zarei, R., Baradaran, M., Bayanati, M., & Zarghi, A. (2023). Chalcones as Potential Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: A Review. Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, 24(2), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715206267309231103053808/CITE/REFWORKS
Orlando, B. J., & Malkowski, M. G. (2016). Substrate-selective Inhibition of Cyclooxygeanse-2 by Fenamic Acid Derivatives Is Dependent on Peroxide Tone. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 291(29), 15069–15081. https://doi.org/10.1074/JBC.M116.725713
Scarpignato, C., Lanas, A., Blandizzi, C., Lems, W. F., Hermann, M., & Hunt, R. H. (2015). Safe prescribing of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with osteoarthritis - an expert consensus addressing benefits as well as gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12916-015-0285-8/FIGURES/1
Wang, X., Ren, Z., He, Y., Xiang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Qiao, Y. (2014). A combination of pharmacophore modeling, molecular docking and virtual screening for iNOS inhibitors from Chinese herbs. Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, 24(1), 1315–1322. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-130934
Wibowo, A. E., Susidarti, R. A., & Puspitasari, I. (2021). Synthesis and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of 1-(2,5-Dihydroxyphenyl)-3-Pyridine-2-Yl-Propenone (AEW-1) Compound. Indonesian Journal of Pharmacy, 32(2), 209–220.
Wilkinson, G. R. (2005). Drug Metabolism and Variability among Patients in Drug Response. New England Journal of Medicine, 352(21), 2211–2221. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMRA032424;PAGEGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
Yadav, A., Sharma, V., & Singh, G. (2024). Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Chalcone Related Compounds: An Updated Review. ChemistrySelect, 9(26), e202401321. https://doi.org/10.1002/SLCT.202401321;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER
Yunta, M. J. R. (2017). It Is Important to Compute Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonding in Drug Design? American Journal of Modeling and Optimization, Vol. 5, 2017, Pages 24-57, 5(1), 24–57. https://doi.org/10.12691/AJMO-5-1-3
Article Metrics
Faculty of Pharmacy
Universitas Gadjah Mada







