KRITIK SASTRA PUITIKA KULTURAL STEPHEN GREENBLATT: METODE DAN PRAKTIK ANALISIS

Moh. Fathoni

doi:10.22146/poetika.v1i2.10411

KRITIK SASTRA PUITIKA KULTURAL STEPHEN GREENBLATT: METODE DAN PRAKTIK ANALISIS

https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v1i2.10411

Moh. Fathoni^(1*)

(1) Sastra Inggris Fakultas Sastra Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

As an exponent of new historicism, Greenblatt initiated cultural poetic in literary criticism . The broad and eclectic of Greenblatt‘s thought in various disciplines and also what he had adopted from other thinkers‘ theory strengthen in practising literary texts analysis, while Greenblatt ‘s writings about literary texts analysis were not formulated in the form of theories and praxis methods. In the other hand, it makes possible for anyone to formulate theories and methods for analysis according to literary criticism does. This paper describes a poetic culture literary critic of Stephen Greenblatt by trying to explore and understand the world through the analysis of his works. The formulation of Greenblatt‘s thought was proccesed by identifying some of his major books in the practice of literary text analysis, such as Renaissance Self - Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare (1980), Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England (1988), and Marvelous possessions: The Wonder of the New World (1991).

Keywords:new historicism, Greenblatt, poetic

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Brannigan, John. 1998. New Historicism and Cultural Materialism. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.

Colebrook, Claire. 1998. New Literary Histories: New Historicism and Contemporary Criticism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Coldiron, A. E. B. 2001. “Toward a Comparative New Historicism: Land Tenures and Some Fifteenth-Century Poems”. Comparative Literature 53, tahun ke 2, edisi Spring 2001.

Greenblatt, Stephen. 1980. Renaissance SelfFashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.

______1988. Shakespearean Negotiations: The

Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.

______. 1990. Learning to Curse: Essays in Early

Modern Culture, New York and London.

______. 1997. “The Touch of The Real”, Jurnal Representation, edisi 57 spesial “The Fate of ‘Culture‘: Geertz and Beyond”.

______ et al. 2010. The Cultural Mobillity:

A Manifesto. New York: Cambridge University Press.

______& Gallager, Catherine. 2000. Practicing

New Historicism. London & Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Liu, Alan. 1989. “The Power of Formalism: The New

Historicism,” dalam English Literary History edisi 56.

Marcus, Jane. 1989. “The Asylum of Antaeus: Women, War, and Madness “Is there a Feminist Fetishism?” dalam The New Historicism, H.Aram Veeser (ed.) New York & London:Routledge.

Newton, Judith Lowder. 1989. “History as Usual? Feminism and the ‘New Historicism” dalam The New Historicism, H. Aram Veeser (ed.) New York & London: Routledge.

Pease, Donald. 1991. “Toward a Sociology of Knowledge,” dalam Consequence of Theory. Jonathan Arac and Barbara Johnson (Ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.

Veensra, Jan R. 1995. “The New Historicism of Stephen Greenblatt: on Poetics of Culture and the Interpretation of

Shakespear,” dalam History and Theory edisi 34, tahun ke-3.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/poetika.v1i2.10411