Implementation Analysis of Army Polytechnic Research Management for The Armament Development of The Indonesian Army
Arief Cahyo Widodo(1), Agus Heruanto Hadna(2), Umi Listyaningsih(3*)
(1) Graduate School of Leadership and Policy Innovation, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Implementing Vocational Higher Education in The Army Polytechnic (Poltekad) has used the Triple Helix approach: universities, the private sector, and the government. In its development, Poltekad contributes to the direction of the development of the Army’s technological innovation field. Based on observations of the results of Poltekad research, it has yet to be utilized optimally in fulfilling Army equipment and weapons. In the last three years, 2020–2022, 163 final research assignments were recorded by Poltekad students, and 40 research by Poltekad lecturers. However, only eight lecturers’ research has become research models with the potential for defense and development in the Army. This study uses a qualitative research method, specifically a case study. The study results show that Poltekad has not been able to play a role as a research university, but is still limited to its function as a vocational education institution in the technology field. The allocation of research funds for Poltekad is still relatively small compared to the benefits of research to support the development of Army Armaments. The research themes of lecturers and students are not entirely following the needs of the development of Indonesian Army weaponry technology. The absence of a Poltekad external monitoring and evaluation team for research programs, limited educational laboratory facilities, and qualified lecturers as researchers in the Poltekad environment are several reasons for optimizing the utilization of Poltekad research results which cannot be carried out downstream in the implementation of production activities carried out by the Defense Industry in Indonesia as is stated in the Poltekad vision. Poltekad, as a Research University, needs to pay attention to elements, such as 1) budgeting, 2) Research Programs, 3) monitoring, and evaluation, 4) researcher competence, 5) facilitation facilities, 6) information and communication systems, and 7) scientific publications. Downstreaming the themes to utilize research results is carried out according to needs and developments.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ardito, L., Ferraris, A., Petruzzelli, A. M., Bresciani, S., & Del Giudice, M. 2019. The role of universities in the knowledge management of smart city projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 312-321.
Baeta, A. M. C., Liboreiro, K. R., Diniz, M. C., Padrão, V. P., & Teixeira, C. P. 2022. Professional Master’s Program in Biotechnology and Innovation Management: The Triple Helix in movement and knowledge generation. Industry and Higher Education, 36(4),429 – 441.
Beck, S., Bergenholtz, C., Bogers, M.,et al. 2022. The Open Innovation in Science research field: A collaborative conceptualisation approach. Industry and Innovation, 29(2), 136–185.
Bousquet, M. 2017. How the university works: Higher education and the low‐wage nation. Class: The Anthology, 299-314.
Chankseliani, M., Qoraboyev, I. & Gimranova, D. 2021. Higher education contributing to local, national, and global development: New empirical and conceptual insights. Higher Education, 81, 109–127.
Coletti, M. 2019. Why Triple Helix governance is useful to dual apprenticeship systems. Industry and Higher Education, 33(6), 381–390.
Cravens, A.E., Jones, M.S., Ngai, C. et al. 2022. Science facilitation: Navigating the intersection of intellectual and interpersonal expertise in scientific collaboration. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 9, 256, 1-13.
de Gayardon, A. 2022. The state and ‘field’ of comparative higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 48(4), 439-456.
Etzkowitz, H. 2003. Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry- Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337.
Filho, W. L. 2011. About the role of universities and their contribution to sustainable development. Higher Education Policy, 24, 427-438.
Fonseca, L., & Nieth, L. 2021. The role of universities in regional development strategies: A comparison across actors and policy stages. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(3), 298–315.
Hicks, D. 2012. Performance-based university research funding systems. Research policy, 41(2), 251-261.
Istambul, M. R. 2019. The impact of i-performance in changing the work culture of lecturers to increase the productivity of three pillars (tri dharma) of higher education in Indonesia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 15-21.
Kemal, I., & Rosyidi, U. 2019. Management of Lecturers Resource Development at Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(5), 246-256.
Laurie, R., Nonoyama-Tarumi, Y., Mckeown, R., & Hopkins, C. 2016. Contributions of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) to Quality Education: A Synthesis of Research. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 10(2), 226– 242.
Qasemi, H. R., & Behzadi, M. 2021. The Role of Higher Education Policies in Science Production (Case Study; Graduate Degrees in University). International Journal of Business, Management and Economics, 2(3), 149-168.
Saghafian, S., Austin, G., & Traub, S. J. 2015. Operations research/management contributions to emergency department patient flow optimization: Review and research prospects. IIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering, 5(2), 101-123.
Sedlacek, S. 2013. The role of universities in fostering sustainable development at the regional level. Journal of cleaner production, 48, 74-84.
Segatto, A. P., Graeml, A. R., & Liboreiro, K. R. 2022. Special issue: Triple Helix and the new production of academic knowledge. Industry and Higher Education, 36(4), 359–360.
Sugiarti, E. 2022. The Impact of Tri Dharma Performance on Higher Education Performance Based on Monitoring Results. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 2(3), 120-126.
Suzigan, W., & Albuquerque, E. D. M. 2011. The underestimated role of universities for the Brazilian system of innovation. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 31, 03-30.
Uwizeye, D., Karimi, F., Thiong’o, C., Syonguvi, J., Ochieng, V., Kiroro, F., Gateri, A., Khisa, A. M., & Wao, H. 2022. Factors associated with research productivity in higher education institutions in Africa: A systematic review. AAS open research, 4, 26.
Yusup, Y., Sanusi, A., Trisnamansyah, S., & Muchtar, H. S. 2021. The Effect of Tridharma Human Resource Management in Higher Education on Improving the Quality of Private Higher Education Lecturers in Clusters of Higher Schools in DKI Jakarta and West Java Regions. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 2(4), 190-208.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jp.84379
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 941 | views : 606Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Populasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of Jurnal Populasi ISSN 0853-6202 (PRINT), ISSN: 2476-941X (ONLINE).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.