ANALISIS CERPEN “ROBOHNYA SURAU KAMI” KARYA A.A. NAVIS DALAM PERSPEKTIF POSMODERNISME LINDA HUTCHEON

https://doi.org/10.22146/sasdayajournal.54566

Rudi Ekasiswanto(1*)

(1) Staf Pengajar Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Departemen Bahasa dan Sastra Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to provide sympathetic insight for who are interested in short stories in Indonesia through the perspective of Linda Hutcheon historical postmodernism. Through this research, we can find a description of story facts and the ideas of the author that are realized through the center and the periphery, along with the contextualization aspects of the short story A.A. Navis’ Robohnya Surau Kami to nowadays society. This research also contributes to literary works appreciation to educational institutions, academics, the society of literary enthusiasts, and the wider community in the form of short story research with the perspective of Linda Hutcheon’s postmodernism so that it is expected to increase the quantity of practice in postmodernism studies. The methodology used in the short story Robohnya Surau Kami using Linda Hutcheon's postmodernist theory is a descriptive method of analysis, by describing the facts which are then analyzed. The analysis does not merely describe but also gives sufficient understanding and explanation. Robohnya Surau Kami by A. A. Navis is a monumental work A. A. Navis containing religious elements. In his work, A. A. Navis presents inner experiences about the concept of the religious life of small communities in Indonesia. This short story is an outstanding and popular work as it is considered as a rare religious literature; AA Navis does not merely tell about worship and devotion to God, but also humanitarian values in Indonesia loaded with caring and tolerance so that it is necessary to trace the facts of the story in the short story, identify the center and the periphery that triggers conflict, and the implications of its contextualization of society in the present.

Keywords


postmodernism, postmodern fiction, story facts, fiction elements, center and periphery, contextualization

Full Text:

PDF


References

Faruk. 2015. Pengantar Sosiologi Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Goodman, Paul. 1977. Creator Spirit Come! The Literary Essay of Paul Goodman. New York: E.P. Dutton.

Herfanda, Ahmadun Yosi. 2008. Sastra sebagai Agen Perubahan Budaya. Dalam Anwar Efendi (Ed.). 2008. Bahasa dan Sastra dalam Berbagai Perspektif. Hlm. 132. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Heryanto, Ariel. 2018. Identitas dan Kenikmatan. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.

Hutcheon, Linda. 1988. A Poetics of Posmodernism. London: Routledge.

-----------. 2004. Politik Posmodernisme Linda Hutcheon. Terjemahan oleh Apri Danarto dari Politics of Posmodernism (1989). Yogyakarta: Jendela.

Kuntowijoyo. 2006. Budaya dan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Mangunwijaya, Y. B. 1982. Sastra dan Religiositas. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.

McHale, Brian. 1991. Postmodernist Fiction. London: Routledge.

Miola, Robert S. 2004. “Seven Types of Intertextuality”. Dalam Michele Marrapodi (Ed.). 2004. Shakespeare, Italy, and Intertextuality. Hlm. 13–25. New York: Manchester University Press.

Pedersen, Lene. 2016. “Religious Pluralism in Indonesia”. Dalam The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology Volume 17 (387–398). 2016.

Prihatmi, Th. dan Sr. Rahayu. 1999. “Gerakan yang Merongrong Tradisi Realisme: Makna dan Fungsinya”. Pidato ini disampaikan pada acara pengukuhan jabatan Guru Besar dalam ilmu kesusasteraan Indonesia Modern di Fakultas Sastra Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang: Tidak Diterbitkan.

Pujiharto. 2010. Pengantar Teori Fiksi. Yogyakarta: Elmatera.

Sarup, M. 2003. Poststrukturalisme dan Posmodernisme: Sebuah Pengantar Kritis. Terjemahan oleh Medhy Aginta Hidayat dari An Introductory Guide to Post-Structuralism and Postmodernism. Yogyakarta: Jendela.

Teeuw, A. 1988. Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra Pengantar Teori Sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Wellek, Rene dan Austin Warren. 1990. Teori Kesusastraan. Terjemahan oleh Melanie Budianta dari Theory of Literature. Jakarta: Gramedia.

White, Edward. 1972. The Pop Culture Tradition: Readings with Analysis for Writing. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, Inc.

Daftar Laman

Duhita, Sattwika. 2018. Alasan Generasi Z Indonesia Paling Fanatik Beragama Dibanding NegaraLain. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vice.com/amp/id_id/article/bj3vew/alasan-generasi-z-indonesia-paling-fanatik-beragama-dibanding-negara-lain. Diakses pada 13 Juni 2019.

Priyanto, Dedik. 2018. Salah Kaprah Arabisasi Islam Indonesia. https://islami.co/salah-kaprah-arabisasi-islam-indonesia/. Diakses pada 13 Juni 2019.

Zulman. Hablum Minallah wa Hablum Minannas. https://bdkpadang/kemenag.go.id/index.php?option=com.content&view=artikel&id=713:zulmanagustus&catid=41:top-headlines&ltemid=158. Diakses pada 28 Mei 2019.

https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/majalah/2014/04/140417_majalah_agama_peran



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/sasdayajournal.54566

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1997 | views : 15309

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 SASDAYA: Gadjah Mada Journal of Humanities

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Registered number ISSN 2549-3884 (online) 

 hit
counter View My Stats