The influence of digital literacy and ChatGPT use on the critical thinking ability among library and information science students

Authors

  • Saenal Abidin Department of Library Science, Alauddin State Islamic University of Makassar
  • Irni Izwah Abu Bakar Dar al-Hikmah Library, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)
  • Irvan Muliyadi Department of Library Science, Alauddin State Islamic University of Makassar
  • Ismaya Ismaya Department of Library and Information Science, Muhammadiyah University of Enrekang
  • Fendy Fendy Department of Library and Information, Al-Ghazali Islamic University Makassar
  • Inawati Inawati Library Science Study Program, Malang State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v22i1.26210

Keywords:

Digital literacy, ChatGPT, critical thinking, students, linear regression

Abstract

Introduction. This study, grounded in digital literacy theory, examines how students’ critical thinking abilities are shaped by digital competency and the use of generative AI in educational settings. The main objective is to determine how ChatGPT use and digital literacy together affect the development of critical thinking. The participants are the library and information science students, who are expected to demonstrate strong competencies in information technology and critical information evaluation.

Research Methods. This study employed a correlational design involving 106 third-semester students from the 2024 cohort. Responses were obtained using a 1–5 Likert-scale questionnaire.

Data Analysis. The data analysisinvolved multiple linear regression, Sobel mediation testing, and bootstrapping. Tests for validity, reliability, and classical assumptions were conducted, and heteroscedasticity was addressed using robust standard errors (HC3).

Results. The results highlight that digital literacy and ChatGPT use collectively accounted for 62.2% of the variance in critical thinking skills. ChatGPT use was the strongest predictor (β = 0.535) and partially mediated the relationship between digital literacy and critical thinking (indirect effect = 0.342; 95% CI = 0.192–0.455).

Conclusion. The study emphasized the importance of integrating digital literacy and ethical AI to enhance students’ critical thinking skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustin, N. C., & Krismayani, I. (2019). Kemampuan literasi digital mahasiswa S-1 angkatan 2018 Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 8(3), 94-107. https://doi.org/10.14710/jip.v8i3.94-107

Ateeq, A. ., Almuraqab, N. A. S. ., Alfiras, M. ., Elastal, M. ., & BinSaeed, R. H. . (2025). The impact of adaptive and interactive ai tools on student learning: From digital literacy to advanced skills. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(6), 961–973. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i6.9775

Berger, V. W., & Zhou, Y. (2014). Kolmogorov–smirnov test: Overview. Wiley Statsref: Statistics Reference Online.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., & Ahuja, M. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642, 1-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Gilster, P., & Glister, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley Computer Pub. New York.

Haliq, A. et al. (2025). Exploring the impact of critical thinking and digital literacy on students’ academic essay writing skills. Diksi, 33(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v33i2.88078.

Haryanti, N. P. P., Suhartika, I. P., & Harsana, I. K. G. (2025). The analysis of librarian digital literacy of universities in Bali. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 21(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v21i1.12014

Jones, P. W. (2018). International policies for third world education. UNESCO, literacy and development. Routledge.

Kasneci, et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

Kurniawan, S. (2025). Literasi digital untuk abad ke-21. Pustaka Aksara.

Law, N. W. Y., Woo, D. J., De la Torre, J., & Wong, K. W. G. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4. 2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265403

Martín-Alguacil, N., Avedillo, L., Mota-Blanco, R. A., Marañón-Almendros, M., & Gallego-Agúndez, M. (2025). ChatGPT as a virtual peer: Enhancing critical thinking in flipped veterinary anatomy education. International Medical Education, 4(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ime4030034.

McAdoo, T. (2023). How to cite ChatGPT. APA Style Blog, 7. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt Peter Madzík, Lukáš Falát, Renata Skýpalová, Lenka Jašušáková, Dominik Zimon, (2026). ChatGPT in science and research: How generative AI drives innovation and knowledge development. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 12(100889), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100889.

Putranto, A., Haryati, H., Gandariani, T., Mitrayati, Siregar, Y. A.& Khaerudin, R.B. (2025). Keterkaitan tingkat literasi digital dan kemampuan berpikir kritis di kalangan mahasiswa era society 5.0. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(1), 2532–2539. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i1.1994.

RaitskayaL., & Tikhonovae. (2025). Enhancing critical thinking skills in ChatGPT-human interaction: A scoping review. Journal of Language and Education, 11(2), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.27387.

Redhana, I Wayan. (2024). Literasi digital: Pedoman menghadapi society 5.0. Samudera Biru. Yogyakarta.

Rubin, R. E., & Rubin, R. G. (2020). Foundations of library and information science. American Library Association.

Safitri, F., Ramlah, R., Sandy, W., & Siregar, A. C. (2025). Literasi digital dalam dunia pendidikan. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Santoso, I., & Madiistriyatno, H. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Indigo Media.

Sujarweni, V. W., & Utami, L. R. (2019). The master book of SPSS. Anak Hebat Indonesia.

Swarjana, I. K., & Skm, M. P. H. (2022). Populasi-sampel, teknik sampling & bias dalam penelitian. Penerbit Andi.

UNESCO, A. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4. 2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2. link?

van Zyl, A., Turpin, M., Matthee, M. (2020). How can critical thinking be used to assess the credibility of online information?. In: Hattingh, M., Matthee, M., Smuts, H., Pappas, I., Dwivedi, Y.K., Mäntymäki, M. (eds) Responsible design, implementation and use of information and communication technology. I3E 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12067. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45002-1_17

Weijun Liang., Yanjun Wu., (2024). Exploring the use of ChatGPT to foster EFL learners’ critical thinking skills from a post-humanist perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 54, 101645, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101645.

Widiastuti, W., & Kania, W. (2021). Penerapan metode diskusi untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir kritis dan pemecahan masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Indonesia, 3(2), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpei.v3i2.50746

Zawacki-Richter, O., Bai, J. Y. H., Lee, K., Slagter van Tryon, P. J., & Prinsloo, P. (2024). New advances in artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00464-3

Downloads

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

Abidin, S., Bakar, I. I. A., Muliyadi, I. ., Ismaya, I., Fendy, F., & Inawati, I. (2026). The influence of digital literacy and ChatGPT use on the critical thinking ability among library and information science students. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 22(1), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.v22i1.26210

Issue

Vol 22 No 1 (2026): June

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  • Articles published in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
  • Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
  • By publishing in Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.