JIK Front Matters Vol. 18 No. 1 2024

Issue

Vol 18 No 1 (2024): March

Date Log

Submitted
Jun 20, 2023
Accepted
Nov 16, 2023
Published
Mar 25, 2024
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Enhancing Tenure Security: A Case Study of the Social Forestry Scheme in the State Forestry Corporation, Malang District, East Java

https://doi.org/10.22146/jik.v18i1.8616
Ramli Ramadhan
ramliramadhan@umm.ac.id
Faculty of Agriculture-Animal Science, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Alvin Naharul Riski
Faculty of Agriculture-Animal Science, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Mochamad Chanan
Faculty of Agriculture-Animal Science, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5105-0919

Corresponding Author(s) : Ramli Ramadhan

ramliramadhan@umm.ac.id

Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan, Vol 18 No 1 (2024): March

Abstract

The Social Forestry Program was a government initiative that yielded significant outcomes and provided unprecedented access and opportunities to the community. One notable change has occurred in the Perhutani area through a scheme known as IPHPS. This scheme provides long-term tenure security to forest farmers with higher returns than before. In addition, extensive experience in addressing tenure conflicts in the Perhutani area, a State Forestry Corporation (SFC), has prompted communities to apply for the IPHPS scheme. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate the dynamics of changes in access and assess their implementation using the concept of property rights as a framework. The results showed that the IPHPS scheme provided community groups the right to manage forests but needed more flexibility to decide on the use of resources. In addition, the management patterns regulation had a significant responsibility to restore forest conditions. Furthermore, this research proposed new rights, particularly management rights, for community groups to manage their forest resources up to the operational level and improve forest conditions. In addition, the absence of a management authority caused difficulties in achieving social forestry's objective of increasing local communities' role in managing their forest resources.

Keywords

social forestry tenure security property right social forestry utilization permit state forest corporation
Ramadhan, R., Riski, A. N., & Chanan, M. (2024). Enhancing Tenure Security: A Case Study of the Social Forestry Scheme in the State Forestry Corporation, Malang District, East Java. Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan, 18(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.22146/jik.v18i1.8616
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Agung, R., Hastanti, B. W., and Haryanti, N. 2020. Dinamika Kelembagaan Perhutanan Sosial di Wilayah Pehutani: Studi Kasus di KPH Telawa, Jawa Tengah. 11(2): 183–197. DOI: 10.14710/politika.11.2.2020.183-197
  2. Arupa. 2014. Rekonfigurasi Hutan Jawa: Sebuah Peta Jalan Usulan CSO. Biro Penerbitan ARuPA, Yogya.
  3. Bratamihardja, mulyadi, Sunito, S., and Kartasubrata, J. 2005. Forest Management in Java 1975-1999 Towards Collaborative Management. ICRAF Southeast Asia Working Paper Bogor, Indonesia.
  4. Djamhuri, T. L. 2012. The effect of incentive structure to community participation in a social forestry program on state forest land in Blora District, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics. 25: 10–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.02.004
  5. Endah Ambarwati, M., Sasongko, G., and M.A Therik, W. 2018. Dynamics of The Tenurial Conflict in State Forest Area (Case in BKPH Tanggung KPH Semarang). Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 6(2). DOI: 10.22500/sodality.v6i2.23228
  6. Erbaugh, J. T. 2019. Responsibilization and social forestry in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 109(June): 102019. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102019
  7. Fisher, M. R., Dhiaulhaq, A., and Sahide, M. A. K. 2019. The politics, economies, and ecologies of indonesia’s third generation of social forestry: An introduction to the special section. Forest and Society 3(1): 152–170. DOI: 10.24259/fs.v3i1.6348
  8. Gilmour. 2012. Forty years of community-based forestry: a review of its extent and effectiveness. Rome.
  9. Hardianti, A. L., Permadi, D. B., and Rohman. 2020. Configuration of resource access explaining the performance of community forest farmer groups in Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 449(1). DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/449/1/012048
  10. Herawati, T., Mwangi, E., and Liswanti, N. 2019. Implementing Forest Tenure Reforms: Perspectives From Indonesia’S Forestry Agencies. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research 6(2): 117–132. DOI: 10.20886/ijfr.2019.6.2.117-132
  11. Kartodihardjo, H., and Cahyono, E. 2021. Agrarian Reform in Indonesia: Analyze Concepts and Their Implementation from a Governance Perspective. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 27: 1–8. DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.27.te.1
  12. Katila, P., McDermott, C., Larson, A., Aggarwal, S., and Giessen, L. 2020. Forest tenure and the Sustainable Development Goals – A critical view. Forest Policy and Economics 120(August). DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102294
  13. Kusters, K., de Graaf, M., Ascarrunz, N., Benneker, C., Boot, R., van Kanten, R., Livingstone, J., Maindo, A., Mendoza, H., Purwanto, E., Rodríguez, C., Ssemmanda, R., Thang, T. N., and Zagt, R. 2022. Formalizing community forest tenure rights: A theory of change and conditions for success. Forest Policy and Economics 141(May). DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102766
  14. Larson, A. M., and Ribot, J. C. 2004. Democratic decentralisation through a natural resource lens: An introduction. European Journal of Development Research 16(1): 1–25. DOI: 10.1080/09578810410001688707
  15. Madjid, M., Permadi, D. B., Wardhana, W., and Septiana, R. M. 2022. Locals’ Claims of Rights and Access to Forest Resources in Three Forest Management Regimes in Gunungkidul Regency, Yogyakarta. Jurnal Wasian 9(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.20886/jwas.v9i1.7043
  16. Maryudi, A. 2011. The contesting aspirations in the forests: Actors, Interests, and Power in Community Forestry in Java, Indonesia.
  17. Maryudi, A. 2012. Restoring State Control Over Forest Resources Through Administrative Procedures: Evidence From a Community Forestry Programme in Central Java. Indonesia. ASEAS-Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 5(2): 229–242.
  18. Maryudi, A., Devkota, R. R., Schusser, C., Yufanyi, C., Salla, M., Aurenhammer, H., Rotchanaphatharawit, R., and Krott, M. 2012. Back to basics: Considerations in evaluating the outcomes of community forestry. Forest Policy and Economics. 14(1): 1–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.017
  19. Maryudi, A., Sahide, M. A. K., Daulay, M. H., Yuniati, D., Syafitri, W., Sadiyo, S., and Fisher, M. R. 2022. Holding social forestry hostage in Indonesia: Contested bureaucracy mandates and potential escape pathways. Environmental Science and Policy 128(1): 142–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.013
  20. MoEF. 2020. Direktorat Jenderal PSKL. Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Republic of Indonesia.
  21. Moeliono, M., Thuy, P. T., Bong, I. W., Wong, G. Y., and Brockhaus, M. 2017. Social forestry-why and for whom? A comparison of policies in vietnam and Indonesia. Forest and Society 1(2): 78–97. DOI: 10.24259/fs.v1i2.2484
  22. Nazir Salim, M., Wulan, D. R., and Pinuji, S. 2021. Reconciling community land and state forest claims in indonesia: A case study of the land tenure settlement reconciliation program in south sumatra. Forest and Society 5(1): 1–22. DOI: 10.24259/fs.v5i1.10552
  23. Ota, M. 2019. From joint forest management to more smallholder-based community forestry : prospects and challenges in Java , Indonesia. Journal of Forest Research 00(00): 1–5. DOI: 10.1080/13416979.2019.1685063
  24. Peluso, N. L. 1993. “Traditions’’ of forest control in Java: implications for social forestry and sustainability.” Global Ecology & Biogeography Letters 3(4–6): 183–157. DOI: 10.2307/2997766
  25. Peluso, N. L., and Vandergeest, P. 2001. Genealogies of the Political Forest and Customary Rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. The Journal of Asian Studies 60(3): 761–812. DOI: 10.2307/2700109
  26. Permadi, D. B., Yuwono, T., and Rohman. 2022. Discretion and Interpretation of Indonesia Social Forestry by Local Forest Bureaucrats: Evidence from Yogyakarta Special Region Province. Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan 16(2): 115–127. DOI: 10.22146/jik.v16i2.2409
  27. Priyo Purnomo, E., and Anand., P. . 2014. The Conflict of Forest Tenure and the Emergence of Community Based Forest Management in Indonesia. Journal of Government and Politics 5(1): 20–31. DOI: 10.18196/jgp.2014.0003
  28. Ragandhi, A., Hadna, A. H., Setiadi, S., and Maryudi, A. 2021. Why do greater forest tenure rights not enthuse local communities? An early observation on the new community forestry scheme in state forests in Indonesia. Forest and Society 5(1): 159–166. DOI: 10.24259/fs.v5i1.11723
  29. Rahayu, S., Laraswati, D., Permadi, D. B., Sahide, M. A. K., and Maryudi, A. 2022. Only a Noise? The Role of Non-governmental Organizations in the Policy Processes of a New Social Forestry Model in Indonesia. Small-scale Forestry (0123456789). DOI: 10.1007/s11842-022-09525-9
  30. Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Tacconi, L., Sloan, S., Hamdani, F. A. U., Subarudi, Alviya, I., and Muttaqin, M. Z. 2019. Indonesia’s land reform: Implications for local livelihoods and climate change. Forest Policy and Economics 108(August 2018): 101903. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.007
  31. Ribot, J. C. 2002. Democratic Decentralization Of Natural Resources. (M. Schultz, ed.) World Resource Institute.
  32. Riggs, R. A., Sayer, J., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A. K., Langston, J. D., and Sutanto, H. 2016. Forest tenure and conflict in Indonesia: Contested rights in Rempek Village, Lombok. Land Use Policy 57: 241–249. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.002
  33. Rodd, M., Fisher, M., Monterroso, I., Liswanti, N., Maryudi, A., Larson, A. M., Mwangi, E., and Herawati, T. 2022. Coordinating forest tenure reform: Objectives, resources and relations in Indonesia, Kenya, Nepal, Peru, and Uganda. Forest Policy and Economics 139(February). DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102718
  34. Rosyadi, S., and Sobandi, K. R. 2014. Relasi Kuasa Antara Perhutani Dan Masyarakat Dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan Di Banyumas: Kepentingan Bisnis Vs Community Empowerment. KOMUNITAS: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture 6(1): 47–56. DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v6i1.2939
  35. Rustiadi, E., and Veriasa, T. O. 2022. Towards Inclusive Indonesian Forestry: An Overview of a Spatial Planning and Agrarian Perspective. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 28(1): 60–71. DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.28.1.60
  36. Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Supratman, S., Yusran, Y., Pratama, A. A., Maryudi, A., Runtubei, Y., Sabar, A., Verheijen, B., Wong, G. Y., and Kim, Y. S. 2020. Prophets and profits in Indonesia’s social forestry partnership schemes: Introducing a sequential power analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 115(March). DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102160
  37. Santoso, H., and Purwanto, E. 2021. Masyarakat, Hutan, dan Negara. Tropenbos Indonesia, Yogyakarta.
  38. Schlager, E., and Ostrom, E. 1992. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Economics 68(3): 249–262. DOI: 10.2307/3146375
  39. Setiahadi, R., Pratiwi, D., and Ratnaningtyas, D. 2017. Deliberation process analysis of community based forest management policies implementation in Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology 7(3): 1076–1082. DOI: 10.18517/ijaseit.7.3.2127
  40. Sikor, T. 2006. Analyzing community-based forestry: Local, political and agrarian perspectives. Forest Policy and Economics 8(4): 339–349. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.08.005
  41. Sikor, T., He, J., and Lestrelin, G. 2017. Property Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis Revisited. World Development The Author(s) 93: 337–349. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.032
  42. Soedomo, S. 2021. Political Economy of Land Use in Indonesia: Trap and Curse of Natural Forests. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 27(Table 2): 42–51. DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.27.te.42
  43. Susilowati. 1999. Konflik Tenurial dan Sengketa Tanah Kawasan Hutan yang Dikelola oleh Perum Perhutani. Jurnal Repertorium 3: 143–151.
  44. Wulandari, C., Fitriana, Y. R., Febryano, I. G., Herwanti, S., Kaskoyo, H., and Putra, H. J. 2021. Complexity of Unsolved Forest Tenurial Conflict: A Case of Way Terusan Forest Management Unit, Lampung Province, Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 27: 21–31. DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.27.te.21
Read More

Author Biographies

Ramli Ramadhan, Faculty of Agriculture-Animal Science, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture-Animal Science, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas No.246 Malang 65144, East Java, Indonesia

Alvin Naharul Riski, Faculty of Agriculture-Animal Science, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture-Animal Science, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas No.246 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144

Mochamad Chanan, Faculty of Agriculture-Animal Science, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture-Animal Science, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas No.246 Malang, East Java, Indonesia 65144

Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 179 Download : 172