W.J.T. Mitchell's Core Ideas on Image and Text

https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.100432

Anastasia Jessica Adinda Susanti(1*)

(1) Faculty of Philosophy, Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study examines the important ideas of W.J.T. Mitchell’s theories on image and text. The link between word and image has long been a topic of controversy, from Plato's differentiation between "word" and "image" in ancient Greece to the current debates around image-text interaction in AI technology. The study of images and words, or iconology, frequently leads to discussions about how politics, power, reality, and value are related to images and texts. An eminent iconologist, William John Thomas (W. J. T.) Mitchell coined the phrase "pictorial turn" in 1994 to counter the linguistic movement, which had replaced the importance of images with language. Mitchell’s theory of image and text covers important ideas such as the pictorial turn, metapicture, biopicture, and the idea of image and text as mixed media. His work covers a broad range of subjects, from media aesthetics, visual culture, iconology, to image theory. The necessity to examine Mitchell's contributions to the study of image and text is expanding as his theories become more and more well-known worldwide.The purpose of this essay is to examine Mitchell's concepts, paying special attention to the dynamic interaction between word and image. In summary, Mitchell's "pictorial turn" positions pictures as dynamic entities and emphasizes their importance in scholarly discourse and culture. His work addresses unresolved questions concerning the nature of images, their connection to language, their historical relevance, and their effect on viewers. Mitchell challenges the traditional understanding of images as passive objects by introducing the idea of "metapictures"—images that reflect on their own nature—and transforming images into active subjects that are capable of self-theorization. The distinction between text and image is blurred by this reinterpretation, which also promotes a greater understanding of the nuanced ways that visual culture influences and reflects the human condition.


Keywords


Mitchell, image, text, metapicture, biopicture, pictorial turn



References

Aquinas, T. (1947). Summa theologica. Benziger Bros.

Aristotle. (2011). De Anima (M. Shiffman, Trans.). Focus Publishing.

Augustine. (2002). The confessions of Saint Augustine (E. B. Pusey, Trans.). Retrieved from Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3296/3296-h/3296-h.htm

Bachmann-Medick, D. (2016). Cultural turns (A. Blauhut, Trans.). De Gruyter.

Bateman, J. A. (2014). Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. Routledge.

Burke, E. (1909). A philosophical inquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful with several other additions. P. F. Collier & Son Company.

Çoşkun, G. E. (2015). Use of multimodal critical discourse analysis in media studies. The Online Journal of Communication and Media, 1(3).

da Vinci, Leonardo. (1500). Paragone of poetry and painting. https://arthistoryproject.com/artists/leonardo-da-vinci/paragone-of-poetry-and-painting/

Fellman, F. (1995). Innere Bilder im Licht des imagic turn. In K. Sachs-Hombach (Ed.), Bilder im Geiste: Zur kognitiven und erkenntnistheoretischen Funktion piktorialer Repräsentationen (pp. 21-38). Brill.

Fried, M. (1967). Art and objecthood. Artforum, 5(10), 50-64. The MIT Press.

Greenberg, C. (1940). Towards a newer Laocoön. Retrieved from https://west.slcschools.org/academics/visual-arts/documents/Laocoon.pdf

Krauss, R. (1979). Grids. October, 9, 50-64.

Krauss, R. (2006). Two moments from the post-medium condition. October, 116, 55–62. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40368424

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold Publishers.

Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in new media age. Routledge.

Martinengo, A. (2018). Pictorial turn/iconic turn. In International Lexicon of Aesthetics. https://dx.doi.org/10.7413/18258630042

McLuhan, M., Quentin, F., & Jerome, A. (2001). The medium is the massage: An inventory of effects. Gingko Press Inc.

McLuhan, M. (2001). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Routledge.

Susanti, A. J. A. (2023). Philosophical discourse on image and text (A historical analysis of image and text Relationship). E-LOGOS,30(1), 14-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.e-logos.497

Rancière, J. (2007). The future of the image (G. Elliot, Trans.). Verso.

Mitchell, W. J. T. (1986). Iconology: Image, text, ideology. The University of Chicago Press.

——————. (1994). Picture theory. The University of Chicago Press.

——————. (2005). What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. The University of Chicago Press.

——————. (2015). Image science: Iconology, visual culture, and media aesthetics. The University of Chicago Press.

Paić, Ž., & Purgar, K. (Eds.). (2016). Theorizing images. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Plato. (2018). Cratylus (B. Jowett, Trans.). Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1616/1616-h/1616-h.htm

Purgar, K. (2016). W. J. T. Mitchell’s image theory: Living pictures. Routledge.

Wiesenthal, C., Bucknell, B., & Mitchell, W. J. T. (2000). Essays into the imagetext: An interview with W. J. T. Mitchell. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal,33(2), 1–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44029680

Zeman, S. (2011). “Grammaticalization” within pictorial art? Searching for diachronic principles of change in picture and language. IMAGE. Zeitschrift für Interdisziplinäre Bildwissenschaft, 14(2), 43-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/16574



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.100432

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 513

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Filsafat

Jurnal Filsafat Indexed by:

Google ScholarSinta (Science and Technology Index)


Jurnal Filsafat ISSN 0853-1870 (print), ISSN 2528-6811 (online)