Kaelan Kaelan(1*)

(1) Dosen Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Gadjah Mada.
(*) Corresponding Author


As we have seen in its fact, the reformation program which is implemented not on the base of the Indonesian nation’s core philosophy drags Indonesian to come into multi-crisis situation. The violence conflict, terrorism, ethnical, racial, class and religious conflicts in this country had sacrificed a big amount of innocence nation’s generation. All of that is caused by unemployed philosophical base of Indonesian state, Pancasila which is dealt with divinity values, humanity, nationality, democracy and social justice in the process of reformation. Therefore, to form the democratic, religious and civilized society in the process of reformation since globalization era, the revitalization of nation state’s philosophical foundation is a must. In addition to form such society, the bureaucrats and political elites ought to develop their political communication attitude based on the morality, religious and civilized values as its result as to realize the welfare society on the togetherness as its foundation. In accordance with both national and rural developments, the philosophy of nation-state must be despised as the foundation of paradigmatic orientation of culture strategy because of national and rural developments are complex problem. Philosophy provides an inter-connected policy foundations and guidance in finding a wise solution to the complex problem.


reformation, philosophy, pancasila

Full Text:



Abdullah, Amin, M., 2004, Integrasi Sains-Islam, Pilar Media,


Andrews, W.G., 1968, Constitutions and Constitutionalism, Van Nostrand Company, New Jersey.

Asshiddiqie, J., 2005, Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Konstitusi Prss, Jakarta.

Asshiddiqie, J., 2006, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta.

Ayatrohaedi, 1986, Kepribadian Budaya Bangsa : Local Genius, Pustaka Jaya, Jakarta.

Barbour, Ian G., 2002, Juru Bicara Tuhan Antara Sains dan Agama, Mizan, Bandung.

Beck, U, 1996, Kapitalismus Ohne Arbeit, Frankfrut.

Berger, P.L., 1988, The Capitalist Revolution. Fifty Propositions about Prosperity, Equality, and Liberty, Basic Books, New York.

Chaidar, Al, 1998, Reformasi Prematur : Jawaban Islam Terhadap Reformasi Total, Darul Falah, Jakarta.

Dicey, A.V., 1973, An Introduction to The Study of the Law of The Constitution, Mac Millan Press, London.

Fukuyama, F., 1989, “The End of History”, dalam National Interest, No. 16 (1989), dikutip dari Modernity and Its Future, h. 48, Polity Press, Cambridge.

____________, 2004, State Building: Governance and the World Order in the 21 Century, NY: Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

Giddens, A., 1995, The Consequences of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge. dalam Modernity and Its Future, h. 48, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Hall S., Held and T. Mc. Grew, (ed.), 1990, Modernity and Its Future, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Hendropriyono, A.M., 2007, Nation State di Masa Teror, Penerbit Rumah Kata, Semarang.

Kaelan, 2002, Filsafat Pancasila Pandangan Hidup Bangsa, Paradigma, Yogyakarta.

______, 2004, Pendidikan Pancasila, Paradigma, Yogyakarta.

______, 2004, Tantangan Dalam Revitalisasi Nilai-nilai Luhur Universitas Gadjah Mada, Makalah yang disajikan dalam Seminar Ravitalisasi Nilai-nilai Luhur Universitas Gadjah Mada, yang diselenggarakan oleh Majelis Guru Besar Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta.

Muhtaj E., 2005, Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Konstitusi Indone- sia, Prenada Media, Jakarta.

Naisbitt, J., 1994, Global Paradox, William Morrow and Company, Inc., New York.


Article Metrics

Abstract views : 6218 | views : 4043


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Filsafat

Jurnal Filsafat Indexed by:

Google ScholarSinta (Science and Technology Index)

Jurnal Filsafat ISSN 0853-1870 (print), ISSN 2528-6811 (online)