Slavoj Zizek’s Criticism of Neoliberalism and Radical Political Subjects

https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.89626

Yohanes De Brito Nanto(1*), Otto Gusti Madung(2)

(1) Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero
(2) Institut Filsafat dan Teknologi Kreatif Ledalero
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Neoliberalism strongly endorses private property rights, free markets, and free trade. In the neoliberal economic system, the role of the state is to create and protect the existence of the market. This article aims to discuss Zizek’s critique of neoliberalism and his account of the radical subject. In this article we try to show that neoliberalism has negative impacts on developing countries, among which are the ecological crisis, economic crisis, and the privatization of national assets. We further elaborate on Zizek’s conviction that the presence of radical subjects can solve this problem by breaking through neoliberalism as The Big Other. The post-liberal ideology that he sees as an alternative for creating people’s welfare is “new communism,” which is different from the old communism proposed by Lenin. This communism emphasizes global solidarity in dealing with global problems and reinvigorates the role of the state as a facilitator to support the national economy.      


Keywords


Neoliberalism, Radical Subject, Slavoj Žižek, Ideology

Full Text:

PDF


References

Adian, D. G. (2011). Setelah Marxisme - Sejumlah Teori Ideologi Kontemporer. Koekoesan.

Belawane, M. (2016). Neoliberalism: Conceptual genealogy, relevance and implications for modern social policy. Socio Informa, 2. https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v2i3.838

Dean, J. (2009). Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies – Communicative capitalism and Left politics. Duke University Press.

Dennar, B. (2020). Melacak daya jalar neoliberalisme global, penderitaan sebagai basis etis pembangunan dan opsi pengembangan masyarakat versi Gereja Katolik. Jurnal Alternatif Wacana Ilmiah Interkultural, 9(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.60130/ja.v9i1.12

Eppler, E. (2015). The Return of the State?. Forumpress.

Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

Hermawandi, Y. (2019). Political economy of neoliberalism International Monetary Fund (IMF): Case study of Indonesia 1997-1998. Kemudi, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.31629/kemudi.v3i.868

Heywood, A. (2016b). Politik global. Pustaka Pelajar.

Jackson, J. (2009). Prosperity without growth, economics for a finite planet. Earthscan.

Jackson, R. (2012). Occupy World Street: A global roadmap for radical economic and polical reform. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Jebadu, A. (2020). Drakula abad 21 - Membongkar kejahatan sistem ekonomi pasar bebas tanpa kendali sebagai sistem kapitalisme mutakhir berhukum rimba dan ancamannya terhadap sistem ekonomi Pancasila. Ledalero.

Lacan, J. (1986). Ecrits. W. W. Norton & Co.

Lukman, L. (2008). Proses pembentukan subjek antropologis filosofis Jacques Lacan. Marjin Kiri.

Magnis-Suseno, F. (2005). Dalam Bayang-bayang Lenin. Gramedia.

Pangaribuan, R. (2023). Kritik teologis dari perspektif John Calvin terhadap pemikiran Walter Lippmann tentang neoliberalisme. Societas Dei, 10(10, 23–54. https://doi.org/10.33550/sd.v10i1.346

Priyono, B. H. (2003). Dalam pusaran neoliberalisme. In I. Wibowo, & F. Wahono (Ed.), Neoliberalisme. Cindelaras Pustaka Rakyat Cerdas.

Robert, R. (2010). Manusia politik, subjek radikal dan politik emansipasi di era kapitalisme global menurut Slavoj Žižek. Marjin Kiri.

Setiawan, R. (2018). Žižek, subjek dan sastra. Jalan Baru.

Wattimena, R. A. A. (2012). Filsafat anti korupsi. Kanisius.

Wood, A. (2005). Capitalism. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford University Press.

Zaenal, A. M. (2012). Metateori redefinisi subjek Slavoj Žižek. Jalan Baru.

Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. Verso.

Žižek, S. (1993). Tarrying with the negative: Kant, Hegel and the critique of ideology. Duke University Press.

Žižek, S. (1999). The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. Verso.

Žižek, S. (2006). The parallax view. The MIT Press.

Žižek, S. (2009). First as tragedy, then as farce. Verso.

Žižek, S. & Milbank, J. (2009). The monstrosity of Christ: paradox or dialectic. The MIT Press.

Žižek, S. (2020). Pandemic!: COVID-19 shakes the world. OR Books.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.89626

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1055 | views : 368

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Filsafat

Jurnal Filsafat Indexed by:

Google ScholarSinta (Science and Technology Index)


Jurnal Filsafat ISSN 0853-1870 (print), ISSN 2528-6811 (online)