Farmer’s Individual Potential in Different Farm Sizes of Local Beef Cattle Farming in Kebumen Regency, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i1.28506

Mochamad Sugiarto(1*), Syarifuddin Nur(2), Oentoeng Edy Jatmiko(3), Marti Ike Wahyu(4)

(1) Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, 53123, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, 53123, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Animal Science, Jenderal Soedirman University, Purwokerto, 53123, Indonesia
(4) Agriculuture and Food office of Kebumen Regency, Kebumen, 54361, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims (1) identify the farmer’s individual potential in different farm sizes and (2) analyze the relationship of basic potential, availability of man power potential, provision of production input potential, and technological mastery potential with the increasing farm size of PO Kebumen cattle. 100 respondents (breeding farmers) from 6 sub-districts known as PO Kebumen beef cattle development centers are selected using a multistage sampling method. The results of Kruskal Wallis Test explain that farmer’s individual potential of PO Kebumen beef cattle farming showed significant difference at different farm size (P<0.01). Based on the Spearman rank correlation test, the availability of technological potential and the provision of production input potential are considered as the important elements regarding to the increasing farm size of PO Kebumen beef cattle (P <0.01). The mastery of technology and the provision of production inputs are the driving factors for increasing the farm size of PO Kebumen cattle.


Keywords


Farm size; Individual potential; Production inputs; Technology

Full Text:

PDF


References

Akimowicz, M., M. B. Magrini, A. Ridier, J. E. Bergez, and D. R. Desjardins. 2013. What influences farm size growth? An illustration in Southwestern France. Appl. Econ. Perspect. P. 35: 242-269.

Akudugu, M. A., E. Guo, and S. K. Dadzie. 2012.  Adoption of modern agricultural production technologies by farm households in Ghana: What factors influence their decisions? J. Biol. Agric. Health 2: 1-14.

Bojnec, S. and L. Latruffe. 2013. Farm size, agricultural subsidies and farm performance in Slovenia. Land Use Policy 32: 207–217.

Crook, T. R., S. Y. Todd, J. G. Combs, D. J. Woehr, and  D. J. Ketchen. 2011. Does human capital matter? Ameta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 96: 443-456.

Dinas Pertanian dan Pangan Kabupaten Kebumen. 2016. Statistik Peternakan Kabupaten Kebumen. Kebumen.

Direktorat Jenderal Bina Produksi Peternakan. 2003. Pedoman Analisis Potensi Peternak. Departemen Pertanian, Jakarta.

Hadrich, C. J. 2011. Human capital and its effect on the farm business life cycle. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/103481/2/AAEA_Hadrich_2011_13179.pdf.Accessed 28 October 2017.

Hailu, B. K., B. K. Abrha, and K. Weldegiorgis. 2014. Adoption and impact of agricultural technologies on farm income: evidence from Southern Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Int. J. Food Agric. Econ. 2: 91-106.

Kusuma, B. S., N. Ngadiyono, and Sumadi. 2017. Estimasi dinamika populasi dan penampilan reproduksi sapi Peranakan Ongole di Kabupaten Kebumen Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Buletin Peternakan 41: 230-242.

Mahmud. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Pustaka Setia, Bandung.

Ndege, M. 2015. Factors that affect the growth and development of small, micro and medium-sized business enterprises in the Vaal Triangle Region of Gauteng Province in South Africa. European Journal of Business, Economics and Accountancy. 3: 73-100.

Nwigwe, C., V. Okoruwa, K. Adenegan, and A. Olajide. 2016. Technical efficiency of beef cattle production technologies in Nigeria: A stochastic frontier analysis. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 11: 5152-5161.

Otieno, J. D., L. Hubbard, and E. Ruto. 2014. Assessment of technical efficiency and its determinants in beef cattle production in Kenya. J. Dev. Agric. Econ. 6: 267-278.

Rapsomanikis, G. 2015. The economic lives of smallholder farmers: An analysis based on household data from nine countries. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

Rzepka, A. and B. Slusarczyk. 2017. The importance of human capital in contemporary small and medium-sized companies in the opinion of managers: Pilot research in Podkarpackie Voivodeship in Poland. Jagiellonian Journal of Management 3: 51-63.

Sofia, L. A., S. Muhammad, N. Hanani, and L. Fata. 2013. Simulation model of household economy on production and welfare of catfish farmer in Banjar Minapolitan, South Kalimantan. J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol. 7: 1-8.

Sugiarto, M. and S. Nur. 2013. Pengembangan potensi sumberdaya peternak sebagai upaya peningkatan daya saing peternakan kambing skala mikro di Kabupaten Banyumas. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sustainable Competitive Advantage (SCA) Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Unsoed, Purwokerto 3: 262-267.

Suroto, K. S. and Nurhasan. 2014. Pengaruh potensi peternak dalam pengembangan sapi potong di Kecamatan Damsol Kabupaten Donggala. Buana Sains 14: 11-20.

Xu, D., J. Zhang, G. Rasul, S. Liu, F. Xie, M. Cao, and E. Liu. 2015. Household livelihood strategies and dependence on agriculture in the mountainous settlements in the three gorges reservoir area, China. Sustainability 7: 4850-4869.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v42i1.28506

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 474 | views : 456

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Buletin Peternakan (Bulletin of Animal Science) Indexed by:

 Harvard Library
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.