The Role of Work Engagement and Psychological Capital on Lecturers’ Readiness to Change in the Era of Technology-Based Education

https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.109327

Rahmatika Sari Amalia(1*), Abdul Fattah(2), Elok Fa’iz Fatma El Fahmi(3), hilda halida(4)

(1) Faculty of Psychology, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Psychology, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Psychology, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Psychology, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Readiness to face technological developments refers to the readiness of lecturers to adapt to changes in the education
sector, which is increasingly using technology in every process. This readiness to change can be influenced by several
factors, including work engagement and the psychological capital of the lecturers. This study aimed to explain the role
of work engagement and psychological capital on readiness to change using multiple linear regression analysis. The
participants in this study were lecturers from several public and private universities in Indonesia, grouped into
Generations X and Y. Participants were recruited through convenience sampling, resulting in a total of 273
participants. The results showed that work engagement and psychological capital simultaneously influence readiness to
change in Generation Y. Meanwhile, only work engagement can influence readiness to change in Generation X. The results
of this study offer input for universities in Indonesia regarding recognizing the patterns of adjustment when it comes
to each generation’s readiness to change in the face of challenges and demands to use the latest technologies in
education.


Keywords


psychological capital; readiness to change; work engagement

Full Text:

PDF


References

Adatsi, J. S. K. (2020). The relationship among generational cohorts, tenure, job categories, and employee readiness for organizational change in a healthcare environment: A quantitative study (Doctoral dissertation, George Fox University). George Fox University Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/dbadmin/27

Amalia, R. S. (2024). Teknologi pembelajaran: Kesiapan pemanfaatan teknologi dan keterikatan kerja pada dosen generasi X dan Y. Inovasi: Jurnal Diklat Keagamaan, 18(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.52048/inovasi.v18i2.580

Atieq, M. Q. (2019). Comparative analysis of employee engagement in employees generation X, Y, and Z. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 11(2), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.24235/amwal.v11i2.4873

Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (Eds.). (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203853047

Bouckenooghe, D., Devos, G., & Van den Broeck, H. (2009). Organizational change questionnaire—Climate of change, processes, and readiness: Development of a new instrument. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 143(6), 559–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980903218216

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136–155.

Diedericks, J. C., Cilliers, F., & Bezuidenhout, A. (2019). Resistance to change, work engagement and psychological capital of academics in an open distance learning work environment. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(1), Article 1142. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v17i0.1142

Dudija, N., & Rahma, F. J. (2023). Psychological capital effect of millennial employees in Indonesia on mental health, readiness for change, and job insecurity. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 2(3), 583–590.

Hanjowo, M. D. F. F., Athahirah, N., Saputra, R. F., Al-Farisi, S., & Rozaq, R. W. A. (2023). Peran pendidikan Indonesia di era Society 5.0. ETNIK: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Teknik, 2(5), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.54543/etnik.v2i5.190

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.

Jacobsen, O., & Stüber, H. (2018). A new generation of change: Generation Y and its attitude towards organizational change projects (Master’s thesis, Halmstad University).

Kadiyono, A. L., & Pardosi, A. (2023). Readiness to adopt new technology: The role of psychological capital and technology readiness. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(Special Issue), 1032–1040. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9ispecialissue.6552

Kemeng, H., & Gwandure, C. (2017). Generation X and generation Y: The moderating effect of transformational leadership on resistance to change and psychological empowerment among employees in Johannesburg (Master’s thesis, University of the Witwatersrand).

Kim, H.-Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52

Lizar, A. A., Mangundjaya, W. L., & Rachmawan, A. (2015). The role of psychological capital and psychological empowerment on individual readiness for change. The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(5), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2015.0063

Luo, C. Y., Tsai, C. H. (Ken), Su, C. H. (Joan), Kim, H. J., Gao, J. L., & Chen, M. H. (2022). How does hotel employees’ psychological capital promote adaptive performance? The role of change readiness. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 51, 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.05.006

Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541–572.

Matthysen, M., & Harris, C. (2018). The relationship between readiness to change and work engagement: A case study in an accounting firm undergoing change. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(1), Article 855. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v16i0.855

Meria, L., Yohana, C., Purwohedi, U., Saukani, & Apriliasari, D. (2023). Reinforcing lecturer readiness to change by increasing psychological capital and engagement. APTISI Transactions on Technopreneurship, 5(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.34306/att.v5i3.214

Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2016). Regression and mediation analysis using Mplus. Muthén & Muthén.

Ningrum, O. A., & Salendu, A. (2021). Pengaruh psychological capital terhadap individual readiness for change pada karyawan sales. Jurnal Diversita, 7(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.31289/diversita.v7i1.4644

Nwanzu, C. L., & Babalola, S. S. (2019). Examining psychological capital of optimism, self-efficacy and self-monitoring as predictors of attitude toward organizational change. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979019827149

Polański, G., & Wołpiuk-Ochocińska, A. (2025). Generations of the fourth industrial revolution in the perspective of positive orientation and technology readiness. New Educational Review (Special Issue), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2024.SI.5.08

Sastaviana, D. (2022). The role of psychological capital on employee’s readiness for change in COVID-19 pandemic era. In Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Conference of Psychology, Health, and Social Science (ICPHS 2021) (Vol. 639, pp. 279–284). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220203.041

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 10–24). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203853047

Sweet, J., & Swayze, S. (2017). The multi-generational nursing workforce: Analysis of psychological capital by generation and shift. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 17(4), 19–32.

Teknowijoyo, F., & Marpelina, L. (2022). Relevansi industri 4.0 dan Society 5.0 terhadap pendidikan di Indonesia. Educatio, 16(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.29408/edc.v16i2.4492



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.109327

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 10 | views : 0

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Recent Issues:

Buku 1 Buku 1 Buku 1 Buku 1 
Vol 11 Issue 1 (2025)
Page 1-69
 Vol 10 Issue 2 (2024)
Page 79-161
 Vol 10 Issue 1 (2024)
Page 1-78
 Vol 9 Issue 2 (2023)
Page 163-292
 


Address:

Building D 6th Floor (606), Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Jl. Sosio Humaniora No. 1, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta, 55781

Contact:

Whatsapp: +6281125210175
Email: gamajop.psikologi@ugm.ac.id

Creative Commons License