1. Home
  2. Vol 6, No 1 (2020)
  3. Sumantri

Komparasi Antara Tingkat Kepuasan Seksual dan Kepuasan Hubungan (Hubungan Friends with Benefit vs. Hubungan Konvensional)

M. Arief Sumantri, Yunita Trisna Dewi
(Submitted 2 February 2020)
(Published 23 May 2020)

Abstract


Penelitian ini akan membandingkan tingkat kepuasan hubungan dan kepuasan seksual. Pengukuran kepuasan hubungan memakai Relationship Assesment Scale yang telah dimodifikasi oleh peneliti, sedangkan untuk kepuasan seksual menggunakan single item yang disusun oleh peneliti. Penelitian ini melibatkan 178 partisipan (89 kelompok FWB, 89 kelompok konvensional), pengumpulan data dilakukan secara online. Analisis data menggunakan independent sample t-test dan analisis kovarians. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perbedaan kepuasan seksual (t = -3,74, p = 0,000) dan kepuasan hubungan (t = 5,88, p = 0,000) antara kelompok konvensional (menikah atau pacaran) dengan FWB. Perbedaan jenis ikatan terbukti memberikan efek terhadap kepuasan hubungan (F = 65,604, p < 0,01, Ƞ2p = 0,273), kelompok konvensional berdasarkan estimasi means memberi efek yang lebih tinggi. Perbedaan jenis ikatan juga berkontribusi terhadap kepuasan seksual (F = 42,008, p < 0,01, Ƞ2p = 0,194), kelompok FWB memberi efek yang lebih tinggi. Perbedaan jenis ikatan (ikatan resmi/ konvensional dan tidak resmi/ FWB) dapat dijadikan rujukan mengapa kepuasan hubungan untuk hubungan konvensional (menikah atau pacaran) lebih tinggi dari hubungan FWB, dan mengapa kepuasan seksual pada kelompok FWB lebih tinggi dari hubungan konvensional. 

Keywords


hubungan FWB; hubungan konvensional; kepuasan hubungan; kepuasan seksual; jenis ikatan

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/gamajop.53991

References


Berliana, S. M., Utami, E. D., Efendi, F., & Kurniati, A. (2018). Premarital sex initiation and the time interval to first marriage among Indonesians. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54(2), 215-232. doi: 10.1080/00074918.2018.1440067


Beautynesia. (2020, Februari 28). Apa sih perbedaan TTM, FWB, dan friendzone dalam suatu hubungan. Beautynesia.id. Diakses melalui https://beautynesia.id/51576/article/life/apa-sih-perbedaan-ttm-fwb-dan-friendzone-dalam-suatu-hubungan


Birnie-Porter, C., & Hunt, M. (2015). Does relationship status matter for sexual satisfaction? The roles of intimacy and attachment avoidance in sexual satisfaction across five types of ongoing sexual relationships. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 24(2), 174-183. doi: 10.3138/cjhs.242-A5


Bisson, M. A., & Levine, T. R. (2009). Negotiating a friends with benefits relationship. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(1), 66-73. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9211-2


Butzer, B., & Kuiper, N. A. (2008). Humor use in romantic relationships: The effects of relationship satisfaction and pleasant versus conflict situations. The Journal of Psychology, 142(3), 245-260. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.142.3.245-260


Byers, E. S. (1999). The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction: Implications for sex therapy with couples. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy/Revue canadienne de counseling et de psychothérapie, 33(2), 95-111.


Byers, E. S. (2005). Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study of individuals in long‐term relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 42(2), 113-118. doi: 10.1080/00224490509552264


Ng, T. K.,& Cheng, H. K. (2010). The effects of intimacy, passion, and commitment on satisfaction in romantic relationships among Hong Kong Chinese people. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 11(2), 123-146.


Dewi, P. Y. T., & Sumantri, M. A. (2020). Menguji kepuasan hubungan melalui intimasi dan perasaan cemburu pada pelaku hubungan friends with benefits. Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan, 10(2), 114-126.doi: 10.26740/jptt.v10n2.p114-126


Edwards, A. (2013, Januari 03). Man, 28, accused of raping 'friend with benefits' when she started new relationship and wanted to end fling. Dailymail.co.uk. Diakses melalui https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2256554/Man-28-accused-raping-friend-benefits-started-new-relationship-wanted-end-fling.html


Evans, M. (2013, Januari 02). Friends with benefits relationship ended in rape court hears. Telegraph.co.uk. Diakses melaluihttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9776502/Friends-with-benefits-relationship-ended-in-rape-court-hears.html


Fajri, D. K. (2016). Gaya cinta dan perilaku seksual pranikah mahasiswa (Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan). Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang.


Fallah, M., Naz, M. S. G., Ozgoli, G., Mehrabi, Y., Farnam, F., & Bakhtyari, M. (2018). Correlation of women’s marital and sexual satisfaction in different family life cycle stages in Khorram Abad, Iran. International Journal of Womens Health and Reproduction Sciences, 6(4), 432-437. doi: 10.15296/ijwhr.2018.72


Fallis, E. E., Rehman, U. S., Woody, E. Z., & Purdon, C. (2016). The longitudinal association of relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction in long-term relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(7), 822-831. doi: 10.1037/fam0000205


Furman, W., Shaffer, L. (2011). Romantic partners, friends, friends with benefits, and casual acquaintances as sexual partners. Journal of Sex Research, 48(6), 554-564. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2010.535623


Givi, H. G., & Setayesh, S. (2018). Relationship between Sexual Satisfaction and Body Image and Attachment Styles with Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy, 8(1), 1-6. doi: 10.4172/2161-0487.1000335


Gusarova, I.,Fraser, V., & Alderson, K. G. (2012). A quantitative study of "friends with benefits" relationships. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 21(1), 41-58.


Handayani, M. M., Suminar, D. R., Hendriani, W., Alfian, I. N., & Hartini, N. (2008). Psikologi Keluarga. Surabaya: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Airlangga.


Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93–98. doi: 10.2307/352430


Hughes, M., Morrison, K., & Asada, K. J. K. (2005). What's love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69(1), 49-66. doi: 10.1080/10570310500034154


Indozone. (2020, Februari 21). Biar nggak terjebak ketahui bedanya friendzone FWB TTM dan ONS. Indozone.id. Diakses melalui https://www.indozone.id/life/JMs8Wl/biar-nggak-terjebak-ketahui-bedanya-friendzone-fwb-ttm-dan-ons/read-all


Knight, K. (2014). Communicative dilemmas in emerging adults’ friends with benefits relationships: Challenges to relational talk. Emerging Adulthood, 2(4), 270-279. doi: 10.1177/2167696814549598


Lawrance, K., & Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long‐term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2(4), 267-285. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x


Lehmiller, J. J., Vanderdrift, L. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2011). Sex differences in approaching friends with benefits relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 48(2-3), 275-284. doi: 10.1080/00224491003721694


Lehmiller, J. J., Vanderdrift, L., & Kelly, J. R. (2014). Sexual communication, satisfaction, and condom use behavior in friends with benefits and romantic partners. Journal of Sex Research, 51(1), 74-85. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.719167


Miller & Clark. (2010). Dating - Philosophy for everyone: Flirting with big ideas. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.


Oktiani, V. (2020, Februari 20). Apa bedanya TTM, FWB, dan friendzone. Wolipop.detik.com. Diakses melalui https://wolipop.detik.com/love/d-4907547/apa-bedanya-ttm-fwb-dan-friendzone


Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Effects of gender and psychosocial factors on “friends with benefits” relationships among young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 311-320. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9611-6


Owen, J., Fincham, F. D., & Polser, G. (2017). Couple identity, sacrifice, and availability of alternative partners: Dedication in friends with benefits relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1785-1791. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0716-4


Ong, V. (2018, Agustus 11). In 2020, dating & being attached are 2 completely different things. goodyfeed.com. Diakses melalui https://goodyfeed.com/in-2018-dating-being-attached-are-2-completely-different-things/


Santrock, J.W. (2014). Adolescence (Edisi kelima belas). Jakarta, Indonesia: Erlangga.


Sarlito, W. S. (2011). Psikologi remaja. (Edisi kelima) Jakarta, Indonesia: Grafindo Persada.


Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia (SDKI) (2018). 5,6% remaja telah melakukan seks pranikah; adiksi pornografi terhadap penularan HIV/AIDS (surat kabar suara pembaruan tanggal 28 Agustus 2018). Diakses melalui http://sdki.bkkbn.go.id/index.php?lang=id&what=news-detail& id=9&type=news


Sprecher, S. (2002). Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: Associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability. Journal of Sex Research, 39(3), 190-196. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552141


Ursila, F. M. (2012). Hubungan kepuasan hubungan romantis dan psychological well being pada mahasiswa yang berpacaran (Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan). Universitas Indonesia, Depok.


Vowels, L. M., & Mark, K. P. (2018). Relationship and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal actor–partner interdependence model approach. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 46-59. doi: 10.1080/14681994.2018.1441991


Vrangalova, Z. (2014, Februari 10). What happens after friends-with-benefits? Can the friendship survive when the benefits end? psychologytoday.com. Diakses melalui https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/strictly-casual/201402/what-happens-after-friends-benefits


Walter, C. M. (2012). Relationship satisfaction: The influence of attachment, love styles and religiosity (Tesis tidak dipublikasikan). Dublin Business School, Dublin.


Weigel, M. (2016). Labor of love: The invention of dating. New York, US: Farrar, Straus and Giroux


Weiten, W., Dunn. D.S., & Hammer, E.Y. (2012). Psychology applied to modern life: Adjustment in the 21st century (Edisi kesepuluh). United States: Cengage Learning.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.