1. Home
  2. Vol 8, No 1 (2022)
  3. Yosita

Kesejahteraan Psikologis pada Ibu yang Berperan Ganda Ditinjau dari Dukungan Suami dan Tekanan Psikologis

Tan Laurencia Yosita, Yohannes Bagus Wismanto, Erna Agustina Yudiati
(Submitted 20 August 2021)
(Published 23 May 2022)

Abstract


Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh dukungan suami dan tekanan psikologis pada ibu yang berperan ganda. Kesejahteraan psikologis dapat dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor, yaitu usia, pendapatan, etnis, dukungan sosial, tekanan psikologis, status keuangan, status pernikahan, kehadiran anak, stabilitas pekerjaan, status sosial dan ekonomi, budaya, dan evaluasi terhadap beberapa area kehidupan. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah 120 orang ibu yang memiliki peran ganda, berusia 23 sampai 28 tahun, memiliki pasangan dan anak. Penelitian ini menggunakan skala kesejahteraan psikologis (Psychological Well Being Scale yang disusun oleh Ryff), skala dukungan suami yang diadaptasi dari Support in Intimare Relationship Rating Scale, dan skala tekanan psikologis (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale K-10). Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu ada hubungan antara dukungan suami dan tekanan psikologis terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis (Ryx1x2 = 0,379; p < 0,01). Selain itu, terdapat hubungan positif antara dukungan suami dan kesejahteraan psikologis (rx1y = 0,298; p < 0,05). Hasil selanjutnya juga menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan negatif yang signifikan antara tekanan psikologis dengan kesejahteraan psikologis (rx2y = -0,322; p < 0,05). Hal ini berarti ketika ibu yang berperan ganda memiliki dukungan suami yang tinggi dan tekanan psikologis yang rendah, maka kesejahteraan psikologis akan tinggi, begitu pula sebaliknya. Sumbangan yang efektif dari kedua variabel tersebut terhadap kesejahteraan psikologis adalah 12,9%.

Keywords


dukungan suami; ibu yang berperan ganda; kesejahteraan psikologis; tekanan psikologis

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/gamajop.68548

References


Akbay, A. S., & Taşçı-Duran, E. (2018). How does spousal support affect women’s quality of life in the postpartum period in Turkish culture? Asian Women, 34(3), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2018.09.34.3.29

Arfianto, M. A., Mustikasari, & Wardani, I. Y. (2020). Apakah dukungan sosial berhubungan dengan kesejahteraan psikologis ibu pekerja? Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa, 8(4), 505-514.

Barry, R. A., Bunde, M., Brock, R. L., & Lawrence, E. (2009). Validity and utility of a multidimensional model of received support in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(1), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014174

Emadpoor, L., Lavasani, M. G., & Shahcheraghi, S. M. (2016). Relationship between perceived social support and psychological well-being among students based on mediating role of academic motivation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 14(3), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9608-4

Fava, G. A. (2012). The clinical role of psychological well-being. World Psychiatry 11(2), 102-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.018

Ilska, M., & Przybyła-Basista, H. (2017). Partner support as a mediator of the relationship between prenatal concerns and psychological well-being in pregnant women. Health Psychology Report, 5(4), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2017.68235

Ilska, M., & Przybyła-Basista, H. (2020). Psychometric evaluation of the Polish version of the Support in Intimate Relationships Rating Scale—Revised (SIRRS-R). Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2020.94261

Kessler, R.C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S.-L. T., Walters, E. E., & Zaslavsky, A. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–976. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291702006074

Lawrence, E., Bunde, M., Barry, R. A., Brock, R. L., Sullivan, K. T., Pasch, L. A., White, G. A., Dowd, C. E., & Adams, E. E. (2008). Partner support and marital satisfaction: Support amount, adequacy, provision, and solicitation. Personal Relationships, 15(4), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00209.x

Meriko, C., Hadiwirawan, O. (2019). Kesejahteraan psikologis perempuan yang berperan ganda. Jurnal Psikologi Unsyiah, 2(1), 68-99. https://doi.org/10.24815/s-jpu.v2i1.13273

Moe, K. (2012). Factors influencing women’s psychological well being within a positive functioning framework (Disertasi tidak dipublikasikan). University of Kentucky.

Osayomi, T., & Adegboye, O. A. (2017). Gender and psychological distress: A geographical perspective. Papers in Applied Geography, 3(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2016.1249511

Ryan, L. H., Wan, W. H., & Smith, J. (2014). Spousal social support and strain: Impacts on health in older couples. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 37(6), 1108-1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9561-x

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

Sugiono, S. (2009). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Viertio, S., Kivirussu, O., Piirtola, M., Partrio, J., Kohornen, T., Marrtunen, M., & Suvisaari, J. (2021). Factors contributing to psychological distress in the working population, with a special reference to gender differences. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 611. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10560-y

Winefield, H. R., Gill, T. K., Taylor, A. W., & Pilkington, R. M. (2012). Psychological well-being and psychological distress: Is it necessary to measure both?. Psychology of Well-Being: Theory, Research and Practice, 2(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/2211-1522-2-3

Yasin, A. S., Dzulkifli, M. A. (2010). The relationship between social support and psychological problems among students. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(3), 110-116.

Yedirir, S., & Hamarta, E. (2015). Emotional expression and spousal support as predictors of marital satisfaction: The case of Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(6), 1550-1558. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.6.2822


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.