Peran Pendidikan Profesi, Efikasi, dan Dukungan Sosial dalam Memprediksi Perilaku Inovatif Guru

Satwika Parama Nandini; Stephanie Yuanita Indrasari

doi:10.22146/gamajop.74544

Peran Pendidikan Profesi, Efikasi, dan Dukungan Sosial dalam Memprediksi Perilaku Inovatif Guru

Satwika Parama Nandini, Stephanie Yuanita Indrasari

(Submitted 18 May 2022)

(Published 28 October 2022)

Abstract

Menjadi inovatif merupakan salah satu kunci keberlangsungan suatu organisasi, termasuk institusi pendidikan. Guru, sebagai pemegang peran krusial dalam institusi pendidikan juga amat perlu mengembangkan perilaku inovatif agar dapat mencapai tujuan pendidikan di abad ke-21. Studi korelasional dilakukan untuk meneliti apakah keikutsertaan pada pendidikan profesi, efikasi guru, dan dukungan sosial di sekolah memprediksi perilaku inovatif pada guru sekolah dasar di Jakarta, Bogor, Bekasi, dan Depok. Sebanyak 234 partisipan mengisi kuesioner self-report untuk mengukur ketiga variabel tersebut. Analisis regresi majemuk dilakukan untuk mengolah data yang diperoleh. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa ketiga variabel signifikan memprediksi perilaku inovatif guru, namun pada dimensi yang berbeda-beda dari perilaku inovatif guru. Selain itu, dukungan sosial ditemukan menjadi kontributor terbesar dalam memprediksi perilaku inovatif guru. Implikasi dari hasil yang ditemukan menunjukkan urgensi pengembangan aspek pendidikan, personal, dan sosial guru agar dapat menerapkan perilaku inovatif dalam kesehariannya.

Keywords

professional education; teachers’ innovative behavior; teachers’ self-efficacy; work support;dukungan sosial; efikasi guru; guru inovatif; pendidikan guru; perilaku inovatif

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.22146/gamajop.74544

References

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.

Binnewies, C., & Gromer, M. (2012). Creativity and innovation at work: The role of work characteristics and personal initiative. Psicothema, 24(1), 100-105. Retrieved from http://www.psicothema.com/PDF/3985.pdf.

Chen, T., Li, F., & Leung, K. (2016). When does supervisor support encourage innovative behavior? Opposite moderating effects of general self‐efficacy and internal locus of control. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 123-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12104.

Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan. (2018). Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Program Pendidikan Profesi Guru. Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi. Retrieved from http://fkip.ums.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2018/07/PEDOMAN-PENYELENGGARAAN-PROGRAM-PENDIDIKAN-PROFESI-GURU.pdf

Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan. (2021). Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan No. 1677 Tahun 2021. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Retrieved from https://ppg.upgris.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Salinan-Perdirjen-Juknis-PPG-Daljab-2021.pdf.

Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2013). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (9th ed). Belmont: Wadsworth.

Greener, S. (2018). Reframing innovative teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(4), 425-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1457135.

Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556.

Heaysman, O., & Tubin, D. (2018). Content teaching: Innovative and traditional practices. Educational Studies, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1446334.

Janssen, O. (2005). The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 573-579.https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X25823.

Klaeijsen, A., Vermeulen, M., & Martens, R. (2018). Teachers’ innovative behaviour: The importance of basic psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and occupational self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research, 62(5), 769-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1306803.

Loogma, K., Kruusvall, J., & Ümarik, M. (2012). E-learning as innovation: Exploring innovativeness of the VET teachers’ community in Estonia. Computers & Education, 58(2), 808-817. https://doi.org/10.16/j.compedu.2011.10.005.

Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There's no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees' creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 757-767. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069309.

Marotz, L., & Allen, K. (2013). Developmental profiles: Pre-birth through adolescent (7th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2012). Development of a measurement instrument for innovative work behaviour as a dynamic and context-bound construct. Human Resource Development International, 15(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2011.646894.

Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. (2014). Exploring the role of target specificity in the facilitation of vocational teachers’ innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 80-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12035.

Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. (2015). Reflection as a facilitator of teachers' innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12052.

Messmann, G., Stoffers, J., Van der Heijden, B., & Mulder, R. H. (2017). Joint effects of job demands and job resources on vocational teachers’ innovative work behavior. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1948-1961. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-03-2016-0053.

Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. (2020). A short measure of innovative work behaviour as a dynamic, context-bound construct. International Journal of Manpower, 41(8), 1251-1267. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2019-0029.

Mishra, P., Bhatnagar, J., Gupta, R., & Wadsworth, S. (2017). How work-family enrichment influence innovative work behavior: Role of psychological capital and supervisory support. Journal of Management & Organization, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.23.

Nemeržitski, S., Loogma, K., Heinla, E., & Eisenschmidt, E. (2013). Constructing model of teachers’ innovative behaviour in school environment. Teachers and Teaching, 19(4), 398-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.770230.

Noefer, K., Stegmaier, R., Molter, B., & Sonntag, K. (2009). A great many things to do and not a minute to spare: Can feedback from supervisors moderate the relationship between skill variety, time pressure, and employees' innovative behavior?. Creativity Research Journal, 21(4), 384-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903297964.

Paramitha, A., & Indarti, N. (2014). Impact of the environment support on creativity: Assessing the mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.419.

Rosser, A. (2018). Beyond access: Making Indonesia’s education system work. Retrieved from https://www.think-asia.org/handle/11540/8034.

Runhaar, P. (2008). Promoting teachers’ professional development [Dissertation]. Enschede: University of Twente. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036527514.

Runhaar, P., Bednall, T., Sanders, K., & Yang, H. (2016). Promoting VET teachers’ innovative behaviour: exploring the roles of task interdependence, learning goal orientation and occupational self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 16(4), 436-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2016.1231215

Simplicio, J. (2000). Teaching classroom educators how to be more effective and creative teachers. Education, 120(4), 675. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A63815682/AONE?u=anon~ab1eed06&sid=googleScholar&xid=3d005f60.

The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2015). Driving the skills agenda: Preparing students for the future. Retrieved from https://edu.google.com/pdfs/skills-of-the-future-report.pdf.

Thurlings, M., Evers, A., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430-417. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949.

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020952.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00036-1.

World Bank. (2015). Teacher certification and beyond: An empirical evaluation of the teacher certification program and education quality improvements in Indonesia. Jakarta: The World Bank Office. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/24433/Indonesia000Te0vements0in0Indonesia.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.