Assessing the Predictive Power of Aptitude Tests on Academic Achievement of Students in Science and Technology Majors

Anindita Dwi Hapsari; Rahmat Hidayat

doi:10.22146/gamajop.83491

Assessing the Predictive Power of Aptitude Tests on Academic Achievement of Students in Science and Technology Majors

https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.83491

Anindita Dwi Hapsari^(1*), Rahmat Hidayat⁽²⁾

(1) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Aptitude tests are used as part of aptitude assessments. The results of these tests can later serve as the basis for providing study major recommendations for clients who wish to pursue their studies at higher education institutions. Two of the aptitude tests used as part of the aptitude assessment are the Differential Aptitude Test (DAT) and the Flanagan Aptitude Classification Test (FACT) which consisted of comprehension, reasoning, patterns, arithmetic, mechanical reasoning, and speed-accuracy subtests. This research intended to know the predictive power of aptitude tests on academic achievement in higher education institutions, especially in the STEM program. Participants in this study were 179 students (111 female, 68 male) at Universitas Gadjah Mada. All participants had taken an aptitude assessment at a psychological service provider and had undergone their first year of study in the STEM programs. Correlation analysis was carried out with the aptitude test as the predictor and GPA as the criterion. This study found that only the numerical ability subtest had a satisfactory correlation coefficient as a predictor of the academic performance in female STEM students in higher education.

Keywords

academic achievement; differential aptitude test; flanagan aptitude classification test; predictive validity

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdelfattah, F. A., Obeidat, O. S., Salahat, Y. A., BinBakr, M. B., & Al Sultan, A. A. (2021). The predictive validity of entrance scores and short-term performance for long-term success in engineering education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 733–746. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2021-0126

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Waveland Press.

Anastasi, A. (1976). Psychological testing (4th ed.). Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/053331647600900215

Anggraini, N. P., Budiyono, & Pratiwi, H. (2019). Cognitive differences between male and female students in higher order thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012006

American Psychological Association. (2022). APA dictionary of psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/aptitude

American Psychological Association, Task Force on Psychological Assessment and Evaluation. (2020). APA guidelines for psychological assessment and evaluation. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-psychological-assessment-evaluation.pdf

Ardiyaning, L. (2012). Seleksi bakat untuk pengembangan potensi siswa berdasarkan Differential Aptitude Test (DAT) berbasis web. Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Asrijanty. (2014). Validitas prediktif bakat skolastik dan prestasi belajar sebagai kriteria seleksi masuk perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 20(4), 515–534.

Azwar, S. (1996). Pengantar psikologi inteligensi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2016). Dasar-dasar psikometrika II.

Azwar, S. (2018). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S., & Ancok, D. (2008). Validitas prediktif diferensial pada ujian tulis UM UGM. In Disertasi (pp. 45–67). Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Bennet, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1947). Differential Aptitude Tests for Personnel and Career Assessment: Technical Manual. The Psychological Corporation.

Bennet, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1952). Differential Aptitude Test: Manual (2nd ed.). The Psychological Corporation.

Bennet, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1948). By the authors.

Chauhan, S. S. (2009). Advanced educational psychology (7th ed.). Vikas Publishing House.

Corengia, A., Pita, M., Mesurado, B., & Centeno, A. (2013). Predicting academic performance and attrition in undergraduate students. Liberabit Revista de Psicologia, 19(1), 101–112.

Daulay, N. (2014). Implementasi tes psikologi dalam bidang pendidikan. Jurnal Tarbiyah, 21(2), 402–421.

Dodonova, Y. A., & Dodonov, Y. S. (2013). Faster on easy items, more accurate on difficult ones: Cognitive ability and performance on a task of varying difficulty. Intelligence, 41(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.10.003

Doppelt, J. E., & Bennett, G. K. (1951). A longitudinal study of the Differential Aptitude Tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 11(2), 228–237.

Dorans, N. J., & Cook, L. L. (2016). Fairness in educational assessment. In Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1–4). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_400

Downey, L. A., Lomas, J., Billings, C., Hansen, K., & Stough, C. (2014). Scholastic success: Fluid intelligence, personality, and emotional intelligence. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 29(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573513505411

Dudung, A., Nurhidayat, D., & Yuliatmojo, P. (2019). The influence of engineering students' numerical reasoning on the academic achievement of Computer Numerical Control (CNC) course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(4), 044053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/4/044053

Erawati, M. (2015). Prestasi akademik siswa dalam kaitannya dengan motivasi akademik, persepsi terhadap dukungan akademik dan peran orang tua. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Fenster, A., Markus, K. A., Wiedemann, C. F., Brackett, M. A., & Fernandez, J. (2001). Selecting tomorrow’s forensic psychologists: A fresh look at some familiar predictors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(2), 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971149

Flanagan, J. C. (1953a). FACT, interpreting test score. Science Research Associates.

Flanagan, J. C. (1953b). FACT examiner manual. Science Research Associates.

Freeman, F. S. (1976). Theory and practice of psychological testing (3rd ed.). Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.

Furr, R. M. (2022). Psychometrics: An introduction (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Gernsbacher, M. A., Soicher, R. N., & Becker-Blease, K. A. (2020). Four empirically based reasons not to administer time-limited tests. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 6(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000232

Goodheart, C. D., Levant, R. F., Barlow, D. H., Carter, J., Davidson, K. W., Hagglund, K. J., Hollon, S. D., Johnson, J. D., Leviton, L. C., Mahrer, A. R., Newman, F. L., Norcross, J. C., Silverman, D. K., Smedley, B. D., Wampold, B. E., Westen, D. I., Yates, B. T., Zane, N. W., Reed, G. M., & Bullock, M. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61(4), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271

Haciomeroglu, E. S. (2016). Object-spatial visualization and verbal cognitive styles, and their relation to cognitive abilities and mathematical performance. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 16(3), 987–1003. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.3.0429

Hertinjung, W. S., Sulandari, S., Utari, A. P., & Hastuti, F. D. (2020). Psychological potential identification of a private vocational high school students, Indonesia: Suitability of interests, aptitude, and selected majors. Journal of Arts & Humanities, 09(12), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.18533/jah.v9i12.2017

Hunsley, J., & Mash, E. J. (2007). Evidence-based assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091419

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.83491

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 10268 |

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Recent Issues:


Vol 11 Issue 1 (2025) Page 1-69		Vol 10 Issue 2 (2024) Page 79-161		Vol 10 Issue 1 (2024) Page 1-78		Vol 9 Issue 2 (2023) Page 163-292

Address:

Building D 6^th Floor (606), Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Jl. Sosio Humaniora No. 1, Bulaksumur Yogyakarta, 55781

Contact:

Whatsapp: +6281125210175
Email: gamajop.psikologi@ugm.ac.id

Username
Password
Remember me