* Corresponding Author
The Regionalism of Borders in Indonesia (Case Study: Sebatik Island, Indonesia)
https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.79811 Agung Satriyo Nugroho(1*), R Rijanta(2), Purwo Santoso(3), Muh Aris Marfai(4)
(1) Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
(4) Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Border management has, on the one hand, grown beyond the conceptual limit that is the terminological definition of borders as lines separating countries to also factor in their development as areas. On the other, it should aim to strengthen state sovereignty and improve the welfare of its citizens. Tese ofen lead to the dichotomy between security and prosperity in border management approaches. Regionalism is an approach used to create regional integration across national borders, but this concept is strongly influenced by the interests of states on each side of the border. Terefore, this research explores if spatial interaction between border communities is controlled by the regionalism concept introduced by the state or, instead, grows organically as part of regionalization due to livelihoods that require border crossings. It used a case study of Sebatik Island in the Indonesia-Malaysia border area. Te qualitative research design applied exploratory principles on the spatial interaction pattern formed between border communities and then synthesized the identified units of information on transboundary activities while considering government-issued policies on border management. Results showed that regionalism was only minimally implemented in managing the border area. It means that border landscapes in Indonesia are organically formed on the micro-scale even though the perspective of regionalism has long been adopted at the regional level, i.e., ASEAN.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agnew, J. (1994). The Territorial Trap : The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory. 1(1), 53–80. http://www.asean.org/images/2012/publications/RoadmapASEANCommunity.pdf
Arifin, M. A. N., Putro, H. P., & Firman, T. (2022). Territorial Politics in Cross-Border Local Development Strategies in the Krayan – Ba ’ Kelalan Region at the Indonesia – Malaysia Border Territorial Politics in Cross-Border Local Development. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2022.2104341
ASEAN Secretariat. (2009). Roadmap for an ASEAN Community 2009-2015. In Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. http://www.asean.org/images/2012/publications/RoadmapASEANCommunity.pdf
Baccini, L., & Dür, A. (2012). The new regionalism and policy interdependence. British Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000238
Bhardwaj, S. K. (2016). India-Bangladesh Border Governance: Issues and Challenges. International Studies, 50(1–2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881716654387
Braunerhielm, L., Olsson, E. A., & Medeiros, E. (2019). The Importance of Swedish–Norwegian Border Residents’ Perspectives for Bottom-Up Cross-Border Planning Strategies. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 73(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2019.1598485
Breslin, S., & Higgott, R. (2003). New regionalism(s) in the global political economy. Conceptual understanding in historical perspective. Asia Europe Journal, 1(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s103080300023
Buszynski, L. (2019). Challenges to Southeast Asian Regionalism in 2018. Southeast Asian Affairs, 3–20.
Cappellano, F., Richardson, K., & Trautman, L. (2021). Cross Border Regional Planning : Insights from Cascadia. International Planning Studies, 26(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2020.1779672
Chatterji, R. (2019). Rethinking Regionalism : The Idea of China-South Asia Trans-Himalayan Regional Cooperation. In Occasional paper, Delhi: Observer Research Foundation (Issue December).
Ethier, W. J. (1998). The New Regionalism. The Economic Journal, 108(449), 1149–1161.
Grugel, J. B. (2004). New regionalism and modes of governance - Comparing US and EU strategies in Latin America. European Journal of International Relations, 10(4), 603–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104047850
Hurrell, A. (1995). Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics. Review of International Studies, 21(4), 331–358. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117954
Iranzo, Á., & Caballero, S. (2020). The periphery at the centre: an analysis of Latin American regionalism from the borders. Space and Polity, 24(3), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2020.1755837
Jimbo, K. (2006). Overview and Introduction: What is Regionalism.
Joenniemi, P. (2017). Others as Selves, Selves as Others: Theorizing City-Twinning. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 32(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1260040
Joenniemi, P., & Jańczak, J. (2017). Theorizing Town Twinning—Towards a Global Perspective. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 32(4), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1267583
Johnston M, D. (1931). The Theory and History of Ocean Boundary Making. In McGill Queen University Press.
Jones, D. M., & Jenne, N. (2016). Weak states ’ regionalism : ASEAN and the limits of security cooperation in Pacific Asia. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 16(2), 209–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcv015
Jones, S. B., & Boggs, S. W. (1947). Review Reviewed Work ( s ): Boundary-Making : A Handbook for Statesmen , Treaty Editors , and Boundary Commissioners . Political Science Quarterly, 62(1), 147–149.
Karim, M. F. (2019). State Transformation and Cross-Border Regionalism in Indonesia’s Periphery: Contesting the Centre. Third World Quarterly, 40(8), 1554–1570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1620598
Kim, S. S. (2004). Regionalization and Regionalism in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(1), 39–67.
Kliem, F. (2020). Regionalism and Covid-19: How EU-ASEAN Inter- Regionalism Can Strengthen Pandemic Management (Issue August).
Lumenta, D. (2010). Changing Spaces and Border Regimes: A Central Borneo Trajectory of “Globalisation.” Jurnal Kajian Wilayah, 1(2), 190–202. http://ejournal.lipi.go.id/index.php/jkw/article/view/283
Mansfield, E. D., & Milner, H. V. (1999). The New Wave of Regionalism. International Organization, 53(3), 589–627.
Mikhailova, E. V. (2013). Appearance and appliance of the twin-cities concept on the Russian-Chinese border. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 40(4W3), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-4-W3-105-2013
Muta’ali, L. (2015). Teknik Analisis Regional: Untuk Perencanaan Wilayah, Tata Ruang dan Lingkungan (Ed. 1). Badan Penerbit Fakultas Geografi UGM.
Panebianco, S. (2010). Volatile Regionalism in the Mediterranean Area. Centre International de Formation Européenne, 2, 153–167.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 26. (2008). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 26 Tahun 2008 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Nasional.
Sadali, M. I., Rijanta, R., Mutaali, L., & Kurniawan, A. (2021). Study of the Service Functions of Health Facilities in Yogyakarta Special Province. ICST 2021 – The 2nd Geoscience and Environmental Management Symposium, 325, 1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202132507006
Sari, B. R. (2016). Borders and Beyond : Transnational Migration and Diaspora in Northen Thailand Border Areas with Myanmas and Laos. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Sattar, S. A. (2011). REGIONALISM : A Great Threat To National Unity Of India Author ( s ): Salma Abdul Sattar Source : , JULY - SEPT ., 2011 , Vol . 72 , No . 3 Published by : Indian Political Science Association Stable URL : https://ww. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 72(3), 759–764.
Sezgin, E. (2018). New regionalism in Turkey: questioning the ‘new’ and the ‘regional.’ European Planning Studies, 26(4), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1403571
Stouffer, S. A. (1940). Intervening Opportunities: A Theory Relating Mobility and Distance. American Sociological Review, 5(6), 845–867. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3651596?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
Tuar, I. G., Sela, R. L. E., & Lakat, R. S. M. (2021). Kajian Pusat-Pusat Pelayanan Kota Tomohon Berdasarkan Hirarki. Jurnal Spasial, 8(1), 133–142. https://digilib.esaunggul.ac.id/UEU-Article-5_0164/13327
Undang - Undang Nomor 43. (2008). Undang - Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 2008 tentang Wilayah Negara. In Undang - Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 2008.
United Nations. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. In United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908329509546068
Van Houtum, H., & Van Naerssen, T. (2002). Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 93(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00189
Vermenych, Y. (2022). Cross-Border Regionalism in European Integration Strategies: A Conceptual Dimension. Foreign Affairs, 32(2), 16–24.
Wang, H. (2013). Comparative Regionalization: EU Model and East Asia’s Practice for Regional Integration. Journal of Global Policy and Governance, 2(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40320-013-0040-5
Woon, W. (2017). The ASEAN Charter Ten Years On. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 39(2), 245–251.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.79811
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 1148
| 
views : 1461
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Agung Satriyo Nugroho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Accredited Journal, Based on Decree of the Minister of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia Number 225/E/KPT/2022, Vol 54 No 1 the Year 2022 - Vol 58 No 2 the Year 2026 (accreditation certificate download)
ISSN 2354-9114 (online), ISSN 0024-9521 (print)