_.png){kind=logo}
* Corresponding Author
Red Tape Phenomenon of Social Securities Distribution During Covid-19: A Socio–Legal Analysis
https://doi.org/10.22146/ikat.v4i2.58137 Mailinda Eka Yuniza(1), Aicha Grade Rebecca(2*)
(1) Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University
(2) Faculty of Law, Gadjah Mada University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
To distribute social aids during a time of a pandemic, red tapes or unnecessary bureaucratic layers needs to be eliminated because the situations demand flexibility. In fact, during the Covid-19 the Indonesian government struggled to hand the staple needs help due to various problems with the existing social aid system. The purpose of this study is to analyze the social and legal factors that create a red tape that hindered the implementations of distributions. This research uses a qualitative approach with data collection techniques of literature and statutory analysis. The result of this study shows that there is an interplay factor between administrative law on social policies and the bureau pathology(Bureaucratic disease) that infects the bureaucratic system of the Ministry of Social Affairs especially in the aspects of managerial, human resources, and tendencies to conduct unlawful actions aspects. The format of the law has proven to be ineffective to be used in a pandemic setting. Furthermore, there are tendencies of upholding the tight legal mechanism to share the responsibilities in between bottom-up government units which had created ineffective within the systems in times of a pandemic. Nevertheless, it shows that the law has already matured in governing the bureaucratic nature in the Ministry of Social Affairs.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
References
Ariefana, P. (2020, April 19). Ada orang yang korupsi bansos corona untuk orang miskin di Depok. Retrieved from Suara.com: https://jabar.suara.com/read/2020/04/19/195915/ampun-deh-ada-korupsi-bansos-corona-untuk-orang-miskin-di-depok
Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, United States of America: Prentice Hall.
Corruption Eradication Commission. (2020). Corruption Eradication Commission's Circular Letter No. 11 on the Use of Integrated Social Welfare Data (DTKS) and Non-DTKS in the giving of Social Assistance. Jakarta: Corruption Eradication Commission.
Debora, Y. (2020, April 7). Deretan bantuan sosial pemerintah bagi warga ditengah corona. Retrieved from Tirto.id: https://tirto.id/deretan-bantuan-sosial-pemerintah-bagi-wargadi-tengah-wabah-corona-eLzL
Deslatama, Y. (2020, April 21). Kelaparan di tengah wabah Corona, yulie tewas setelah minum galon isi ulang. Retrieved from Liputan 6: https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/4232979/kelaparan-di-tengah-wabah-corona-yulie-tewas-setelah-minum-galon-isi-ulang
DKI Jakarta Governor Regulation. (2020). DKI Jakarta Governor Regulation No. 33 of 2020 regarding the Implementation of PSBB to Handle COVID-19 in DKI Jakarta Province. Jakarta: DKI Jakarta Governor Regulation.
DKI Jakarta Governor’s Decision No 386. (2020). DKI Jakarta Governor’s Decision No 386 year 2020 Regulations Regarding Social Assistance Recipients for the Poor and Vulnerable to Poverty due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Jakarta: DKI Jakarta Governor’s Decision.
DKI Jakarta’s Governor’s Decree. (2020). DKI Jakarta’s Governor’s Decree No 23 Year 2020 on Large Scale Social Limitation .Jakarta: DKI Jakarta’s Governor’s.
Gailmard, S., & Patty, J. W. (2012). Formal models of bureaucracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 353-377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-031710-103314.
Galligan, D. (2007). Law in Modern Society. Oxford: Calendron Press.
Gazley, B. (2014). Intersectoral collaboration and the motivation to collaborate. In L. B. Bingham, Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 46-64). New York: Routledge.
Gifford, & Pinchot, E. (1994). End of Bureaucracy and rise of the intelligent organization. San Francisco: Berrett‐Koehler.
Goodsell, C. (2015). The new case for bureaucracy. London: SAGE Publication.
Harrington, C. B., & Carter, L. H. (2009). Administrative law and politics: Cases and comments. Washington D. C.: CQ Press.
Hart, H. L. (1961). The Concept of Law. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
House of Representative of the Republic of Indonesia. (2011). House of Representative of the Republic of Indonesia on Law No 13 Year 2011 on Poverty Handling . Jakarta: House of Representative.
Islamy, M. I. (1998). Agenda Kebijakan Reformasi Administrasi Negara. Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi- Universitas Brawijaya.
Johnston, J., & Romzek, B. (1999). Contracting and Accountability in State Reform, Rhetoric Theories & Reality. Public Administration Review, 59(5), 383-399. doi:10.2307/977422.
Kim, C. K. (2014). Anti-Corruption Initiatives and E-Government: A Cross-national Study. Public Organization Review, 14(3), 385–396. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0223-1.
Makir, S. (2020, April 19). Pengamat Nilai Bansos Pemerintah Masih Sekadar Cerita. Retrieved from CNN Indonesia: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20200419104350-20-494946/pengamat-nilai-bansos-pemerintah-masih-sekadar-cerita
Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. (2020). Minister of Health Regulation Number 9 of 2020 regarding Guidelines for Large-Scale Social Restrictions to Accelerate Mitigation of the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).Jakarta: Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia.
Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. (2017). Ministry of Social Affairs No 28 year 2017 on Verification and Validations of Integrated Social Welfare Data and Poverty Handling Management . Jakarta: Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia.
Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. (2019). Ministry of Social Affairs Decree No 5 Year 2019 on the Integrated Social Welfare Data Management. Jakarta: Ministry of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia.
Moe, H. (2010). Governing Public Service Broadcasting: “Public Value Tests” in Different National Contexts. Media Governance: New Policies for Changing Media Landscape, 3(2), 207-223. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01067.x
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods:Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Actions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pollit, C. (2009). Structural change and public service performance: International lessons? Public Money & Management, 29(5), 285–291. doi:10.1080/09540960903205907).
Pollitt, C., Van Thiel, S., & Homburg, V. (2007). New Public Management in Europe. New York: Springer.
Rhys, A., Boyne, G., & Walker, R. (2011). The Impact of Management on Administrative and Survey Measures of Organizational Performance. Public Management Review, 13(2), 227-235. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.532968).
Satria. (2020, May 10). Pengamat UGM: Data Penerima Bansos Covid-19 Perlu Diperbarui. Retrieved from UGM.ID: https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/19429-pengamat-ugm-data-penerima-bansos-covid-19-perlu-diperbaruiibid
Siagian, S. P. (1994). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Taher, A. P. (2020, April 27). Mensos Juliari lempar masalah pendataan penerima bansos ke Pemda. Retrieved from Tirto.id: https://tirto.id/mensos-juliari-lempar-masalah-pendataan-penerima-bansos-ke-pemda-fbH9.
Thoha, M. (2002). Perspektif Perilaku Birokrasi: Dimensi-dimensi Prima Ilmu Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Book.
Zantvoort, B. (2015). On Inertia: Resistance to Change in Individuals, Institutions and the Development of Knowledge. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 11(1), 342-360.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ikat.v4i2.58137
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 1322
| 
views : 1447
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Aicha Grade Rebecca, Mailinda Eka Yuniza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.