Production Risk of Rice in Kebonsari, Madiun Regency
Rosita Dewati(1*), Lestari Rahayu Waluyati(2)
(1) Master Student of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
(2) Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Jl. Flora No. 1 Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study aims to determine the risks, factors affecting risk and investigate the attitude toward risk in Kebonsari, Madiun regency. This research used primary and secondary data. Primary data obtained purposively by 61 respondents. Coefficient of variation (CV) method was used to analyze the risk, while Just and Pope model was used to analyze the factors affecting production risk. Attitude toward risk was analyzed with Moscardi and de Javnry model. The result of production risk analysis shows that production of rice farming in Kebonsari Madiun regency has a low variation which is about 14,80%. It means that production risk faced by paddy farmers in this area is low. Phonska fertilizer and other fertilizer are risk-increasing variables whereas liquid pesticide is risk decreasing variable. The result of K (s) indicated that 91,60% or 56 paddy farmers are risk averter. About 4,92% of paddy farmers are risk lover and 3,28% are risk neutral. The farmers are behaving in rational manner which avoid the possible risk that might be higher than the revenues to be earned.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, A. M., Gindi, A. A., Darham, S., & Radam, A. (2015). Farmers’ Attitudes Toward Risks In Paddy Production Of North- West Selangor Integrated Agricultural Development Area (Iada), Malaysia. Asian Economic and Social Society, 5(7), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1005/2015.5.7/1005.7.158.166
Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Madiun. (2017). Kabupaten Madiun Dalam Angka 2017.
Guttormsen, A. G., & Roll, K. H. (2013). Production Risk in a Subsistence Agriculture. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, I-13, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2013.775953
Imelda, Mulyo, jangkung H., & Darwanto, D. H. (2008). Analisis Perilaku Petani Terhadap Risiko Usahtaani Lidah Buaya Di Pontianak. Agro Ekonomi, 15(1), 17–34.
Just, R. E., & Pope, R. D. (1979). Production Function Estimation and Related Risk Considerations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 6(2), 276–284.
Kea, S., Li, H., & Pich, L. (2016). Technical Efficiency and Its Determinants of Rice Production in Cambodia. Economics 2016, 4(22), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies4040022
Kurniati, D. (2015). Perilaku Petani Terhadap Risiko Usahatani Kedelai Di Kecamatan Jawai Selatan Kabupaten Sambas. Social Economic of Agriculture, 4(April), 32–36.
Lucas, M. P., & Pabuayon, I. M. (2011). Risk Perceptions , Attitudes , and Influential Factors of Rainfed Lowland Rice Farmers in Ilocos Norte , Philippines. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Develompment, 8(2), 61–77.
Moscardi, E., & Janvry, A. De. (1977). Attitudes Toward Risk among Peasants : An Econometric Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(4), 710–716.
Nainggolan, S., Amir, A., Napitupulu, D. M. ., & Delis, A. (2017). Estimation Of Efficiency And Risk Behaviors Productivity For Rice Farmers In The Province Of Jambi. Asian Jounal of Science and Technology, 8(3), 4507–4516.
Prihtanti, T. M. (2014). Analisis Risiko Berbagai Luas Pengusahaan Lahan Pada Usahatani Padi Organik Dan Konvensional. Agric, 26(1), 29–36.
Pusdatin Kementrian Pertanian. (2016). Outlook Komoditas Pertanian Padi.
Se, B., Made, I., & Mejaya, J. (2014). Wereng Cokelat sebagai Hama Global Bernilai Ekonomi Tinggi dan Strategi Pengendaliannya. Iptek Tanaman Pangan, 9(1), 1–12.
Sriyadi. (2010). Risiko Produksi dan Keefisienan Relatif Usahatani Bawang Putih di Kabupaten Karanganyar. Jurnal Pembangunan Pedesaan, 10(2), 69–76.
Suharyanto, Rinaldy, J., & Ngurah Arya, N. (2015). Analisis Risiko Produksi Usahatani Padi Sawah. AGRARIS: Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development Research, 1(2), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.18196/agr.1210
Yang, Z., Mugera, A. W., & Zhang, F. (2016). Investigating Yield Variability and Inefficiency in Rice Production : A Case Study in Central China. Sustainability, 8(787), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080787
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ae.35711
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 3285 | views : 2690Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Agro Ekonomi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats