Petrophysical Study and Rock Type Determination of Siliciclastic Reservoir: Case Study Sand of Bekasap Formation, AF Field, Central Sumatra Basin, Indonesia

Dwi Charisah Andriyani; Sarju Winardi; Sugeng Sapto Surjono

doi:10.22146/jag.83471

Petrophysical Study and Rock Type Determination of Siliciclastic Reservoir: Case Study Sand of Bekasap Formation, AF Field, Central Sumatra Basin, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.22146/jag.83471

Dwi Charisah Andriyani⁽¹⁾, Sarju Winardi^(2*), Sugeng Sapto Surjono⁽³⁾

(1) Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

An integrated subsurface study has been performed for a large and mature field at the Bekasap Formation in Central Sumatra Basin. The Bekasap Formation sand represents an undeveloped reservoir because of its heterogeneity. There are five sand reservoirs (BK1, BK2, BK3, BK4, and BK5) from Bekasap Formation, which each zone or layer bounded by a flooding surface. Each sand reservoir has particular characterization based on petrophysical properties that represent geological process. The petrophysical properties consist of shale volume, porosity, and water saturation obtained by wireline log calculation. This study uses conventional core data to validate the log calculation to achieve an accurate interpretation. Bekasap reservoir is a sandstone reservoir deposited in an estuarine with tide-dominated. Formation evaluation was done to determine the interest zone by petrophysical properties. The result well-log calculation and reservoir cut-offs showed the thickest reservoir in the BK 3 with the best average values of petrophysical properties with an average shale volume 0.32; porosity of 0.245. Otherwise, in rock type determination, four lithofacies are divided in the reservoir based on flow units. The sample RT 1 and RT2 provided the best reservoir zones with HFU1 and HFU2. The RT 3 and RT 4 dominated in HFU3 and HFU4 had the lowest potential zones of reservoir. The final findings showed a good correlation between sedimentologic analysis and petrophysical properties in the rock type determination. As a result, the best reservoir quality development is controlled by the depositional environment (texture and structure) rather than the diagenetic process in this reservoir. It is proven by petrophysical properties in BK1, and BK2 is coastal barrier sand (tidal sand bar) has more clean sand rather than in BK3 and BK4 deposited in the offshore bar.

Keywords

Bekasap Formation;Petrophysical Study;Rock Type Determination;Siliciclastic Reservoir

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agan, A., Maneechai, K., Pramudyo, Y.B., & Hendra, A.A. (2009). New fault reinterpretation using edge seismic attribute to optimize WF performance inBekasap Field, Central Sumatra Basin, Proceeding Indonesian Petroleum Association 33rd Annual Convention 33, 1272-1281.

Amaefule, J.O., Altunbay, D., Tiab, D., Kersey, D.G.,& Keelan, D.K. (1993). Enhanced Reservoir Description: Using Core and Log Data to Identify Hydraulic Flow Unit and Predict Permeability in Uncored Intervals, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE Paper 26436.

Asquith, G., & Gibson, C. (1982). Basic Well Log Analysis GeoLogist, The American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa. DOI:10.1306/MTH3425.

Buckles, R.S. (1965). Correlating and averaging connate water saturation data. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 4,42–52. DOI:10.2118/65-01-07.

Camyra, F., Nurdrajat, Firmansyah, Y., & Ganjar, R. M. (2022). Perbandigan Nilai Saturasi Air padaZona Reservoir Batupasir Serpihan (Shaly Sand) dengan Pendekatan Model Indonesia dan ModelSimandoux, Studi Kasus di Cekungan Sumatera Selatan. Padjajaran Geoscience Journal. Vol.6 No.1.

Coates, G., & Dumanoir, J.L. (1973). A new approach to improve log-derived permeability; Society of Professional Well Log Analysis.14^th Ann. Logging Symp.,Trans. Paper R.

Crain, E.R. (2001).Crain’s Petrophysical Handbooks. 3^rd Millennium Edition, Spectrum 2000.

Dalrymple, R.W., & Choi, K. (2006). Morphologic and facies trends through the fluvial-marine transition in tide-dominated depositional systems: A schematic framework for environmental and sequence stratigraphic interpretation. Earth-Science Reviews 81 (2007) 135–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.10.002.

Flugel, E. (2010). Microfacies of Carbonate Rocks: Analysis, Interpretation, and Application. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2^nd Edition.

Heidrick, T. L., & Aulia K. (1993). A structural and tectonic model of the coastal plains block, Central Sumatra Basin, Indonesia. In 22nd Annual Confer ence Proceedings of Indonesian Petroleum Association, 285-317.

Kassab, M.A., Abdou, A.A., El Gendy, N.H., Shehata, M.G., & Abuhagaza, A.A. (2017). Reservoircharacteristics of some cretaceous sandstones, North Western Desert, Egypt.Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 26 (2), 391–403.

Kosoemadinata, R.P. (1978). Geologi Minyak dan Gas Bumi, ITB, Bandung.

Kumar, K. C. (2010). On the Application of Siman doux and Indonesian Shaly Sand Resistivity Interpretation Models in Low and High Rw Regimes , 8th Biennial International Conference & Exposition of Petroleum Geophysics.

Lemigas (2013). An integrated petrography, SEM, and XRD analysis on the conventional core at AF 32, AF 33, AF 34, Central Sumatera Basin [unpublished company report], Jakarta, Indonesia.

Lev, V. (2000). Permeability prediction in poorly consolidated siliciclastics based on porosity and clay volume logs, Petrophysics (Houston, Tex), 1529-9074.

LKFT UGM, (2021) Laporan Akhir Studi Statik dan Dinamik Lapangan AF [unpublished company report], UGM, Yogyakarta.

Moosavi, N., Bagheri, M., Nabi-Bidhendi, M., & Hei dari, R. (2022). Fuzzy support vector regression for permeability estimation of petroleum reser voir using well logs, Acta Geophysica, 70, 161–172 (2022). DOI:10.1007/s11600-021-00700-8.

Pertamina BPPKA (1996). Peta Geologi Regional dan tipe minyak pada Cekungan Sumatera Tengah , HIS database.

Porras, J.C., Barbato, R., & Khazen, L. (1999). Reser voir Flow Units: A comparison between three different models in the Santa Barbara and Pirital Fields, North Monagas Area, Eastern Venezuela Basin , SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SPE Paper, 53671.

Pramudyo, Y.B., Hendar, S. M., Nur, Hasyim M., Reinhold, M.R., & Garry W.J. (2007). An Integrated Study of Low Permeability Reservoir in the Bekasap Field, Central Sumatra Basin, Indonesia . The Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhi bition, Jakarta, Indonesia, October 2007. DOI: 10.2118/109846-MS.

Sawy, M.Z., Abuhagaza, A.A., Nabawy, B.S., & Lashin, A. (2020). Rock typing and hydraulic flow units as a successful for reservoir characterization of Bentiu-Abu Gabra sequence, Muglad basin,Southwest Sudan. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 171, 103961. DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.103961

Shalaby, M.R. (2021). Petrophysical characteristics and hydraulic flow units of reservoir rocks: Acase study from the Khatatba Formation, Qasr field, North Western Desert, Egypt. Journal of Petroleum Sciences and Engineering, 198, 108143. DOI:10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108143.

Waren, R., & Noeradi, D. (2010). Reservoir geometry identification of tide dominated estuarine environment deposits and its implication to reservoir qualities: a case study within the upper sand of Bekasap Formation, Gadang Field, Central Sumatra Basin, Indonesia. Proceedings of 34th Indonesian Petroleum Association Annual Convention.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jag.83471