Exploring metaverse online platform “Gather.Town” for collaborative learning activities to improve participants’ engagement in adolescent health workshop intervention

https://doi.org/10.22146/jcoemph.86494

Dyana Safitri Velies(1*), Jocelyn Jocelyn(2), Johan Wibowo(3), Veli Sungono(4)

(1) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia
(4) Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


 Introduction: Health-related behavior in adolescents gives significant impact on their future health and the next generation. Some interventions toward adolescents’ health-related behaviors have resulted ineffectively, owing to status and respect sensitivity in adolescents’ uniqueness. Covid-19 pandemic caused restrictions to face-to-face meetings and educational activities. The "gather.town" metaverse was used to construct an online event platform that included attractive and interactive educational workshops to induce collaborative learning activities for adolescents, as a result of on Human Centered Design process that starts with adolescents and ends with tailored innovative solutions to improve their health. This study aims to explore the use “gather.town” as a metaverse online platform to engage with adolescents during intervention to improve.

Methods: The intervention was designed and organized by a student-led organization using a metaverse online platform “gather.town” to reach out to adolescents in Indonesia, consisting of ten workshops, each demonstrating a health topic with a skill-learning approach using interesting activity guided by a pair of knowledgeable speakers. Moreover, “gather.town” offers unique options such as creating individual avatar and interacting with people outside the workshop rooms during the event. The main event was divided into morning and afternoon sessions with a total of 140 adolescents from different areas and educational backgrounds in Indonesia.

Results: Only 47% of participants gave feedback through online evaluation from. All participants were satisfied with the workshops. Thirteen percent of participants were unsatisfied with the “gather.town” platform.

Conclusion: Using a human-centered design approach to combine skills and health knowledge increases adolescents’ interest to join the intervention. Future interventions may consider exploring other user-friendly platforms and total number of activities to accommodate more participants in each workshop.


Keywords


adolescent health; health intervention; human-centered design; meaningful youth participation

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, et al. Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. The Lancet. 2016; 387: 2423-78. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00579-1.
  2. Spear LP. The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2000; 24: 417-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00014-2.
  3. Viner RM, Ozer EM, Denny S, et al. Adolescence and the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2012; 379: 1641-52. 20120425. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60149-4.
  4. Patton GC, Olsson CA, Skirbekk V, et al. Adolescence and the next generation. Nature. 2018; 554: 458-66. DOI: 10.1038/nature25759.
  5. Global Health Estimates 2019: deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000-2019 [internet]; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-leading-causes-of-death.
  6. Yeager DS, Dahl RE and Dweck CS. Why interventions to influence adolescent behavior often fail but could succeed. Perspect Psychol. Sci. 2018; 13: 101-122. 20171212. DOI: 10.1177/1745691617722620.
  7. Blakemore SJ and Mills KL. Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing?. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014; 65: 187-207. 20130906. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202.
  8. Chandra-Mouli V, Lane C and Wong S. What does not work in adolescent sexual and reproductive health: A review of evidence on interventions commonly accepted as best practices. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2015; 3: 333-40. DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-15-00126.
  9. UNICEF. Human centered design 4 health [internet]. Accessed 2 January 2022. Available from: https://www.hcd4health.org/
  10. PMNCH. Global consensus statement meaningful adolescent & youth engagement [internet]; 2020. Available from: https://pmnch.who.int/resources/publications/m/item/global-consensus-statement-on-meaningful-adolescent-and-youth-engagement
  11. Ippoliti N, Sekamana M, Baringer L, et al. Using human-centered design to develop, launch, and evaluate a national digital health platform to improve reproductive health for Rwandan youth. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2021; 9: S244-S260. DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-21-00220.
  12. Fakoya I, Cole C, Larkin C, et al. Enhancing human-centered design with youth-led participatory action research approaches for adolescent sexual and reproductive health programming. Health Promot Pract. 2022; 23: 25-31. 20210415. DOI: 10.1177/15248399211003544.
  13. Maatuk AM, Elberkawi EK, Aljawarneh S, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic and e-learning: Challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2022; 34: 21-38. DOI: 10.1007/s12528-021-09274-2.
  14. Lee Y, Jung J-H, Kim H, et al. Comparative case study of teamwork on zoom and Gather.Town. Sustainability. 2023; 15: 1629. DOI: 10.3390/su15021629.
  15. Hwang Y, Shin D and Lee H. Students’ perception on immersive learning through 2D and 3D metaverse platforms. Educational technology research and development. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2023; 1-22. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-023-10238-9.
  16. Palos-Sanchez PR, Baena-Luna P and Silva-O’Connor D. Exploring employees’ beliefs regarding the potential benefits of virtual worlds for group cohesion: gather town. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11042-022-14308-7.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jcoemph.86494

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 851 | views : 606

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Community Empowerment for Health

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of Community Empowerment for Health
Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Jl. Farmako, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
Sekretariat Bersama Jurnal Room, 2nd floor above IKM canteen
📧 jcoemph.fk@ugm.ac.id
Instagram @jcoemph.journal
© 2025 Journal of Community Empowerment for Health