The critical role of informed consent for doctors and patients in the community

https://doi.org/10.22146/jcoemph.95638

Yuliana Yuliana(1*)

(1) UNIVERSITAS UDAYANA
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Introduction: Malpractice and medical case disputes are commonly found in the community. It was caused by misperception between patients and doctors in a medical case. Therefore, the informed consent role is essential for patients and doctors. This paper aims to describe the role of informed consent for patients and doctors.

Methods: This is a narrative literature review. Literature was taken from PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. The selected journals were published within 10 years.

Results: Informed consent is a sign of approval for any medical procedure that might cause disputes. On the doctors’ side, informed consent is a legal protection. On the other side, informed consent is an explanation for the patient in helping decide on approval or rejection of any medical procedure. An informed consent paper has legal protection for the attending physician. Doctors must give accurate and complete information about the procedure before it is done. Patients have the right to have an explanation, give consent, or rejection regarding any procedure. When a doctor does a medical procedure before giving informed consent, it is considered malpractice. Informed consent is related to human rights fulfillment. Patients have the right to accept or reject any medical procedure after the doctors explain thoroughly about the procedure.

Conclusion: In conclusion, the role of informed consent for doctors is legal protection and obligation. Meanwhile, the role of informed consent for the patients is to fulfill human rights.



Keywords


Doctor; informed consent; malpractice; legal protection, patient

Full Text:

PDF


References

1.Syafruddin & Rohman A. Model Perlindungan Dan Pemenuhan Hak Pasien Terhadap Pelaksanaan Informed Consent Di Indonesia. Mimb. Huk. 2019; 31: 222–236.

2.Amirthalingam, K. Medical dispute resolution, patient safety and the doctor-patient relationship. Singapore Med J. 2017; 58: 681–684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2017073

3.Susilowati, E. A., Yuspin, W. & Absori. Compliance of Medical Personnel Against the Implementation of Informed Consent : A Lawsuit Prevention Study for Medical Disputes. Soepra Huk. Kesehat. 2021; 7: 259–274.

4.Vikas, H., Kini, A., Sharma, N., Gowda, N. R. & Gupta, A. How informed is the informed consent? J Fam. Med Prim Care. 2021: 10: 2299–2303. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc.

5.Kasiman, Azhari, A. F. & Rizka. The Role of Informed Consent Against Doctor ’ s Legal Protection in Health Services. Soepra. 2023; 9: 1–8.

6.Cioffi, A. & Zaami, S. Italian Law no. 219/2017: consequences on the informed consent of the psychiatric patient and on the therapeutic privilege. Pensiero Sci. Ed. 2020; 55: 129–130.

7.Vergallo, G. M. & Spagnolo, A. G. Informed Consent and Advance Care Directives: Cornerstones and Outstanding Issues in the Newly Enacted Italian Legislation. Linacre Q. 2019; 86: 188–197.DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1177/0024363919837863.

8.Sutarno & Maryati. Information of Medical Malpractice and Risks in The Informed Consent Process Before Surgery in Indonesia. Yust. J. Huk. 2021; 10: 269–290. DOI: https://doi.org0.20961/yustisia.v10i2.52132

9.Asharib, M. et al. Perceptions and practices regarding the process of obtaining informed consent from surgical patients at a tertiary care hospital. Ann. Med. Surg. 2022: 73: 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103195

10.Wuryanto, S. & Khodijah, N. Tinjauan Pelaksanaan Pengisian Informed Consentpada Kasus Bedah Orthopedi Di RS PKU Muhamadiyah Gamping Sleman Yogyakarta. Media Ilmu Kesehat. 2016; 5: 247–252.

11.Jennie, S. I. & Lestari, A. Y. Philosophical Basis of Informed Consent, Informed Refusal and Documentation of Medical Information into Medical Record. Media Huk.2019; 26: 60–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.20190123.

12.Hanson, M. & Pitt, D. Informed consent for surgery: risk discussion and documentation. Can J Surg. 2017; 60: 1–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.004816.

13.Nauta, M. et al. From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AI. ACM Comput Surv. 2022; 55: 1–50.

14.Hassija, V. et al. Interpreting Black ‑ Box Models: A Review on Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Cognit. Comput. 2024; 16: 45–74. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-023-10179-8.

15.Bouderhem, R. Shaping the future of AI in healthcare through ethics and governance. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024; 11: 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02894-w.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jcoemph.95638

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 184 | views : 88

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Community Empowerment for Health

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.