TANTANGAN METODE PENELITIAN INTERDISIPLINER DALAM PENDIDIKAN HUKUM INDONESIA

Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman; Widodo Dwi Putro

doi:10.22146/jmh.44305

TANTANGAN METODE PENELITIAN INTERDISIPLINER DALAM PENDIDIKAN HUKUM INDONESIA

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.44305

Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman⁽¹⁾, Widodo Dwi Putro^(2*)

(1) Universitas Airlangga
(2) Universitas Mataram
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Abstract

Based on field research at numerous campuses, this article unravels teaching practices and legal research at Indonesia’s law schools. This article is not aimed to explain the debates on normative and empirical in legal research, but it explains why such debates had been vehemently becoming unresolved and as challenge in improving interdisciplinary approach. This article shows finding that vehement debates happen since both tradition legal research apply them seem like religious doctrine.

Intisari

Berbasis riset lapangan di sejumlah kampus, melihat praktik pengajaran dan penelitian hukum di pendidikan tinggi hukum Indonesia. Artikel ditujukan bukan untuk menjelaskan pertentangan antara normatif dan empiris dalam penelitian hukum, melainkan menjelaskan mengapa pertentangan tersebut mengeras dan menjadi tantangan dalam mengembangkan pendekatan interdisipliner. Artikel menunjukkan temuan bahwa pertentangan mengeras karena keduanya menjadikan seperti doktrin layaknya beragama.

Keywords

penelitian hukum, normatif, metode, interdisipliner, kecerdasan buatan

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buku Banakar, Reza and Travers, Max. 2005. “Introduction”, dalam Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research. Hart Brown, Valerie A. and Harris, John Alfred. 2010. Tackling Wicked Problems Through the Transdisciplinary Imagination. Earthscan. Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Belknap Press Cambridge Mass, Finnis. J., 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Hoecke, Marc. V. 2011. ‘Legal Doctrine: Which Method(s) for What Kind of Discipline?’ in Methodologies of Legal Research. Hart. Kueffer, Christoph, et all. 2007. ’Towards a Publication Culture in Transdisciplinary Research’, Gaia: Okologische Perspektiven in Natur-, Geistes- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Kuhn, T.S.. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolution. University of Chicago Press. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2005. Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2014. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Kencana Moeliono, Tristam, 2011. “Spatial management in Indonesia : from planning to implementation: Cases from West Java and Bandung: a socio-legal study”, doctoral thesis, Leiden University, Leiden. Safitri, Myrna, 2000, “Forest tenure in Indonesia: the socio-legal challenges of securing communities’ rights”, doctoral thesis, Leiden University, Leiden. Sommerville, M.A. dan Rapport, D.J. (eds) 2000. Transdiciplinarity: ReCreating Integrated Knowledge. EOLSS Publishers Stolker, Carel, 2015. Rethinking Law Schools. Education, Research, Outreach and Governance. Cambridge University Press. Wignyosoebroto, Soetandyo. 2002. Hukum: Paradigma, Metode dan Masalah. HuMa-ELSAM, Jakarta. Wiratraman, Herlambang P. 2014. Press Freedom, Law and Politics in Indonesia. A Socio-Legal Study. E.M. Meijers Institute/Wohrmann, Leiden. Jurnal Balkin, J, ’Interdisciplinarity as Colonization’, Washington and Lee Law Review 53, 1996 [949–70] Balsiger, P.W, Supradisciplinary research: history, objectives and rationale, Futures 36, 2004. Bedner, Adriaan, ’Indonesian Legal Scholarship and Jurisprudence as an Obstacle for Transplanting Legal Institutions’. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 5 2013 [253-273] Despres, C, N. Brais, S. Avellan, Collaborative planning for retrofitting suburbs: transdisciplinarity and intersubjectivity in action, Futures 36, 2004. Jones, T. Horlick-, J. Sime, Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity, Futures 36, 2004. Klein, J. Thompson, ‘Prospects for transdisciplinarity’, Futures 36, 2004. Klink, B. Van Klink and Taekema, S “‘A dynamic model of interdisciplinarity: Limits and possibilities of interdisciplinary research into law’”. Working Paper 2008, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1142847. Kroeze, Irma J. “Legal Research Methodology and the Dream of Interdisciplinarity” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, August 29, 2013. Lawrence, R.J., Housing and health: from interdisciplinary principles to transdisciplinary. Futures 36, 2004. Nissani, M. ’Fruits, salads, and smoothies: A working definition of interdisciplinarity’. Journal of Educational Thought, 29, 1995 [121–8] Putro, Widodo D. dan Wiratraman, Herlambang P. Penelitian Hukum, Antara yang Normatif dan Empiris. Digest Epistema, Vol. 5, 2015 [3-16]. Siems, Mathias M. 'The Taxonomy of Interdisciplinary Legal Research: Finding the Way Out of the Desert'. Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education, Vol. 7, pp. 5-17. 10 November 2009. Website AI versus lawyers, vaccines for everything and other top stories of the week, World Economic Forum, 23 November 2018, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/11/ai-lawyers-vaccines-for-everything-and-other-top-stories-of-the-week/ (diakses 25 Januari 2019) Legal Made Simple (Rocket Lawyer), https://www.rocketlawyer.com (diakses 4 Februari 2019) The robot lawyers are here - and they’re winning, BBC NEWS, 1 November 2017, https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41829534 (diakses 25 Januari 2019).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.44305