Description of Professional Fee for Pharmacist in Sleman

https://doi.org/10.22146/jmpf.34062

Hardika Aditama(1*), A. Saputri(2), D. Fadhilah(3), K. Mayningrum(4), A. Sawitri(5), W.A. Pratiwi(6), I.N. Pristhifani(7)

(1) Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(2) Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(3) Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(4) Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(5) Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(6) Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(7) Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Pharmacist is a profession whose existence is needed by community. However, within the community of pharmacy itself, the presence of pharmacist is quite alarming. One of the causes of low pharmacist who desire to practice in the community of pharmacy is the low level of professional fee offered. This study aimed to describe professional fee received by pharmacist and the workload of pharmacist in Sleman. This study was a descriptive non-experimental that was conducted in Sleman in August 2017. Population of this study was a pharmacist who practiced in community of pharmacy in Sleman. Total of 170 respondents from 128 pharmacies were involved in this research. However, 6 questionnaires cannot be analyzed because it is not completely filled. The highest amount of professional fee is between Rp 2.000.000-Rp 3.000.000. Almost all respondents (78%) stated the amount of professional fee that was received was not as expected. The workload of pharmacists is not so heavy and most of the patient are self medication. Pharmacists at the community of pharmacy should be able to show a better work performace, which is shown by increasing pharmacy revenues to get a better rewards.

Keywords


jasa profesi, beban kerja, apotek

Full Text:

PDF


References

1. Handayani RS, Raharni, Gitawati R. Persepsi Konsumen Apotek terhadap Pelayanan Apotek Di Tiga Kota di Indonesia. Makara. 2009;13(1):22-26.

2. Dominica D, Putra DP, Yulihasri. Pengaruh Kehadiran Apoteker Terhadap Pelayanan Kefarmasian di Apotek di Kota Padang. J Sains Farm dan Klin. 2016;3(1):99-107.

3. Dhermawan AANB, Sudibya IGA, Utama IWM. Pengaruh Motivasi Lingkungan Kerja Kompetensi dan Kompensasi terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Kinerja Pegawai di Lingkungan Kantor Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Provinsi Bali. J Manajemen, Strateg Bisnis, dan Kewirausahaan. 2012;6(2):173-184.

4. Djamaan A, Syahrul L, Aulia DD. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kepuasan Kerja Apoteker yang Bekerja di Apotek Kota Padang. J Sains dan Teknol Farm. 2013;18(1):1-8.

5. Hodgin R, Chandra A. Applying Economic Model “Efficiency Wage” Concept for Pharmacists: Can “Efficient” Salaries Reduce Pharmacist Turnover? J Health Manag. 2014;16(4):465-470. doi:10.1177/0972063414548552.

6. Houle SKD, Grindrod KA, Chatterley T, Tsuyuki RT. Paying pharmacists for patient care: A systematic review of remunerated pharmacy clinical care services. Can Pharm J. 2014;147(4):209-232. doi:10.1177/1715163514536678.

7. Dewi DAPS, Satibi, Puspandari DA. Analisis Biaya Obat pada Era JKN dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi di Fasilitas Penunjang Kesehatan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. JMPF. 2015;5(4):283-291.

8. Scotia PA of N. Wage and Benefits Survey. 2013th ed. New Scotia: PANS; 2013.

9. Scott DM. 2006 North Dakota pharmacists’ wage and workload assessment. J Pharm Technol. 2009;25(1):14-23. doi:10.1177/875512250902500104.

10. Scott DM, Halvorson D. Assessment of pharmacy technicians’ salary, benefits, and responsibilities in North Dakota. J Pharm Technol. 2007;23(3):148-157. doi:10.1177/875512250702300304.

11. PD IAI DIY. SK Pengurus Daerah IAI DIY Tentang Jasa Profesi Apoteker DIY.; 2017.

12. Gubernur DIY. Keputusan Gubernur Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Tentang Penetapan UMK Tahun 2017.; 2016.

13. Presiden RI. Peraturan Pemerintah Tentang Gaji Pegawai Negeri Sipil.; 2015.

14. Shafie AA, Hassali MA. Community Pharmacy Dispensing Costs in the State of Penang, Malaysia. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2011;1(6):143-145.

15. Carvajal MJ, Armayor GM. The life-cycle argument : Age as a mediator of pharmacists ’ earnings. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2015;11(1):129-133. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.05.003.

16. Carvajal MJ, Armayor GM. Inequalities in the distribution of pharmacists ’ wage-and-salary earnings : Indicators and their development. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2013;9(6):930-948. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.01.004.

17. Sukwadi R. Perbaikan Struktur Gaji Dasar Karyawan Berdasarkan Hasil Analisa dan Evaluasi Jabatan. Spektrum Ind. 2014;12(1):93-104.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmpf.34062

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 2238 | views : 21748

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 JURNAL MANAJEMEN DAN PELAYANAN FARMASI (Journal of Management and Pharmacy Practice)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

©Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi
Faculty of Pharmacy
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Creative Commons License
View My Stats