Script Concordance Test untuk Menilai Kemampuan Penalaran Klinis Dokter: Bagaimana Mengembangkan Butir Soalnya Berdasarkan Standar Kompetensi Dokter Indonesia?

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25100

Fundhy Sinar Ikrar Prihatanto(1*)

(1) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Some methods have been developed to assess clinical reasoning skill. It must be understood the principals of each method for the selection if will be applied. In the other hand, it is realized that uncertainty is one of medical context that is poorly measured by other traditional test. The script concordance test (SCT) may be a better method of assessing students, who are taught in the context of uncertainty. SCT could differentiate examinees according to levels of experience in various fields of study. SCT have practical relevance for clinical education. The objective of this study is to give guidance in developing SCT based on Indonesian medical doctor competence

Method: Relevant literatures are selected as basis of recommendations of SCT construction.

Results: Developing SCT needs to consider its: principles as basis of development; format of test item to build a suitable test item, scoring system and panel selection accommodate context of uncertainty, and optimization of test item to enhance SCT.

Conclusion: SCT provide investigation on clinical reasoning skill of examinee in the difficult by other objective written methods. Several studies have showing SCT capacity in different levels of experience, and in several field of studies with good results. SCT could be as supplement to assess clinical reasoning skill comprehensively, not replacing other clinical competence assessment method absolutely.


Keywords


Clinical reasoning skill, script concordance test, panel, scoring system

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Vertue FM, Haig BD. An abductive perspective on clinical reasoning and case formulation. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2008; 64(9): 1046-68.
  2. Sibert L, Giorgi R, Dahamna B, Doucet J, Charlin B, Darmoni SJ. Is a web-based concordance test feasible to assess therapeutic decision-making skills in a French context? Medical Teacher. 2009;31: e162–e168.
  3. Beullens J, Struyf E, van Damme B. Do extended matching multiple-choice questions measure clinical reasoning? Medical Education. 2005;39: 410–7.
  4. Elstein AS. Beyond multiple-choice question and essay: the need for a new way to assess clinical competence. Academic Medicine. 1993; 68(4):244-9.
  5. Boshuizen HPA, van der Vleuten C, Schmidt HG, Maciels-Bongaerts M. Measuring knowledge and clinical reasoning skills in a problem-based curriculum. Medical Education. 1997;31: 115-21.
  6. Pinnock R, Jones A. An undergraduate paediatric curriculum based on clinical presentations and ‘key features’. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2008;44:661–4.
  7. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE guide no. 3.Medical Teacher. 2007;29: 855–71.
  8. De la Fish, Cole. Curriculum Development, Open University Press; 2005.
  9. Fournier JP, Demeester A, Charlin B. Script concordance tests: guidelines for construction. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2008;8:18.
  10. Duggan P. Development of a script concordance test using an electronic voting system. Ergo. 2007;1:35-41.
  11. Khonputsa P, Besinque K, Fisher D, and Gong WC. Use of script concordance test to assess pharmaceutical diabetic care: a pilot study in Thailand. Medical Teacher. 2006;28(6): 570-3.
  12. Labelle M, Beaulieu M, Paquette D, Fournier C, Bessette L, Choquette D, Rahme E, Thivierge RL. An integrated approach to improving appropriate use of anti-inflammatory medication in the treatment of osteoarthritis in Quebec (Canada): the CURATA model. Medical Teacher. 2004;26(5): 463–70.
  13. Lambert C, Gagnon R, Nguyen D, Charlin B. The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning. Radiation Oncology. 2009;4:7.
  14. Sibert L, Darmoni SJ, Dahamna B, Hellot MF, Weber J, Charlin B. Online clinical reasoning assessment with script concordance test in urology: results of a French pilot study. BMC Medical Education. 2006; 6:45.
  15. Cohen LJ, Fitzgerald SG, Lane S, Boninger ML, Minkel J, McCue M. Validation of the seating and mobility script concordance test. Assistive Technology. 2009;21:47-56.
  16. Humbert A. Assessing the clinical reasoning skills of emergency medicine clerkship students using a script concordance test. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2008; 15(5): S231.
  17. Lubarsky S, Chalk C, Kazitani D, Gagnon R, Charlin B. The script concordance test: a new tool assessing clinical judgment in neurology. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009;36: 326-31.
  18. Brownel AKW. The script concordance tests. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009;36:272-3.
  19. Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia. Standar kompetensi dokter. Jakarta: KKI; 2006.
  20. Gagnon R, Charlin B, Lambert C, Carrie‘re B, van der Vleuten C. Script concordance testing: more cases or more questions? Adv in Health Sci. Educ. 2009; 14:367–75.
  21. Sibert L, Darmoni SJ, Dahamna B, Weber J, Charlin B. Online clinical reasoning assessment with the script concordance test: a feasibility study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2005; 5:18.
  22. Charlin B, Desaulniers M, Gagnon R, Blouin D, van der Vleuten C. Comparison of an aggregate scoring method with a consensus scoring method in a measure of clinical reasoning capacity. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 2002;14(3): 150-6.
  23. Charlin B, Gagnon R, Pelletier J, Coletti M, Abi-Rizk G, Nasr C. Sauve E, van der Vleuten C. Assessment of clinical reasoning in the context of uncertainty: the effect of variability within the reference panel. Medical Education. 2006;40: 848–54.
  24. Charlin B, Gagnon C, Sauvé E, Coletti M. Composition of the panel of reference for concordance tests: do teaching functions have an impact on examinees’ ranks and absolute scores? Medical Teacher. 2007;29(1):49-53.
  25. Gagnon R, Charlin B, Coletti M, Sauve E, van der Vleuten C. Assessment in the context of uncertainty: how many members are needed on the panel of reference of a script concordance test? Medical Education. 2005; 39: 284–91.
  26. Dubois JM, Michenaud C, Isidori P. A new way to assess medical competencies: the script concordance test (SCT) on line. Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education. 2006; 1143-7.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25100

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1508 | views : 1646

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Fundhy Sinar Ikrar Prihatanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by: