Penggunaan Audit Klinis Sebagai Cara Pembelajaran untuk Meningkatkan Perilaku Peserta Didik PPDS Onkologi Radiasi Periode September 2010 - Maret 2011

Fielda Djuita(1*), Harsono Mardiwiyoto(2), Ova Emilia(3), Soehartati Soehartati(4)

(1) RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta
(2) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(3) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(4) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author


Background: Clinical Audit is one of the formative evaluations that conducted to maintain and increase behavior and performance of the Radiation Oncology students, as an effort to maintain radiotherapy services and grant the quality of education. The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of clinical audit in improving students’ behavior.

Method: This was a quasi-experimental research time series. We have done audit to the medical record chart of the residences at Policlinic I, II, III and stay at semester 3, 4, 5 in FK UI/RSUPNCM between September 2010 and December 2011 (T0). Audit had done by the author and one of the lectures. After analyzing the audit report, the reports were sent to the students one by one through email followed by forwarding it to the lecturer involved in this research. Then we continue the audit by performing the second clinical audit (T1) from January until March 2011. We used the mean score from the two auditors. The score divided into 4 groups as follows: hospital clinical record, treatment prescription, simulation and planning also evaluation during treatment. After that the author compared the audit score before and after intervention with t-test.

Results: There were 16 Oncology Radiation students with 163 cases (To) and 156 cases (T1) who worked at Policlinic I, II and III. Behavior mean score is 1.9229 (T0), standard deviation 0.0514 and mean score after first intervention is 1.9764, standard deviation 0.0479 with p= 0.006.

Conclusion: The students’ behaviors and performance are changed significantly after intervention.


Medical education, radiation oncology, audit clinic, formative evaluation, quality assurance, personal behavior

Full Text:



  1. Department of Health Service Provision – World Health Organization. Quality and accreditation in health care services: a global review [document on the internet]. WHO Geneva; 2003. Available from:http://www.who. int/hrh/documents/en/quality_accreditation.pdf
  2. American Society for Radiation Oncology. Fast fact data of cancer [document on the internet]. ASTRO; 2007 [cited 2008 March 16]. Available from:
  3. Quality Assurance Team for Radiation Oncology (QUATRO). Comprehensive audits of radiotherapy practices: a tool for quality improvement [document on the internet]. International Atomic Energy Agency; 2007. Available from: Pub1297_web.pdf.
  4. Shakespeare TP, Back MF, Lu JJ, Lee KM, Mukherjee RK. External audit of clinical practice and medical decision making in a new Asian oncology center: results and implications for both developing and developed nations. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys. 2006;64(3):941–7.
  5. Brundage MD, Dixon PF, Mackillop WJ, Shelley WE, Hayter CR, et al. A real-time audit of radiation therapy in a regional cancer center. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys. 1999;43(1):115-24.
  6. Leong CN, Shakespeare TP, Mukherjee R, Back MF, Lee KM, Lu JJ, Wynee CJ, Lim K, Tang J, Zhang X. Efficacy of an integrated continuing medical education (CME) and quality improvement (QI) program on radiation oncologist (RO) clinical practice. Int J Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2006;66:1457-60.
  7. Shakespeare TP, Mukherjee RK, Lu JJ, Wynne CJ, Kumar MB, Back MF. A comparison of RANZCR and Singapore-designed Radiation Oncology practice audit instruments: how does reproducibility affect future approaches to revalidation? Australas Radiol. 2004; 48:195-203.
  8. Zissiadis Y, Harper E, Harper C. Development of a clinical chart audit program. Australasian Radiology. 2006;50:349-54.
  9. Esik O, Seitz W, Lovey J, Knocke TH, Gaudi I, Nemeth G, et al. External audit on the clinical practice and medical decision-making at the departments of radiotherapy in Budapest and Vienna. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 1999;51(1):87-94.
  10. Shakespeare TP, Back MF, Lu JJ, Wynne CJ, Bloomfield L. Design of an internationally accredited radiation oncology training program incorporating novel educational models. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(4):1157-62.
  11. Toohey J, Shakespeare TP, Morgan G. The RANZCR 2006 peer review audit instrument. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. 2008;52(4):403-13.
  12. Beck DE. Performance-based assessment: using pre-established criteria and continuous feedback to enhance a student’s ability to perform practice tasks. Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2000;XIII(5):347-63.
  13. Shakespeare TP, Muhkerjee R, Rahul K, Lu JJ, Lee KM, Back MF. Evaluation of an audit with feedback continuing medical education program for radiation oncologists. J Cancer Education. 2005;20:216-21.
  14. Gray J. Changing physician prescribing behavior. Can J Clinical Pharmacology. 2006;131:e81-e82. Robertson N, Baker R, Hearnshaw H. Changing the clinical behavior of doctors: a psychological framework. Quality in Health Care. 1996;5:51-4.
  15. Goulet F, Jacques A, Gagnon R, Racette P, SieberW. Assessment of family physicians’ performance using patient charts: interrater reliability and concordance with chart-stimulated recall interview. Eval Health Prof. 2007;30(4):376–92.
  16. Rahayu GR. Assessment methods for measuring clinical competence: review on psychometric properties. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran dan Profesi Kesehatan Indonesia. 2005;1: 25-38.
  17. Grant W. Education assessment: designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1998.
  18. Nancy Y, Jacobs L, Martinez ED, Budiger SC. Improved surgeon performance in clinical trial: an analysis of quality assurance audits from the American college of surgeons oncology group. J Am Col Surgical. 2006;203:269-76.
  19. Emilia O. Kompetensi dokter dan lingkungan belajar klinik di rumah sakit. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 2008.
  20. Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. The New Journal of Medicine. 2007;356: 387-96.
  21. Prihatiningsih TS. Konsep dasar sistem penjaminan mutu. Makalah pada Post Simposium Workshop Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan Klinik Pada Program Pendidikan dan Program Pendidikan Dokter Spesialis/ Sub Spesialis. Yogyakarta; 2008 Nov 25- 26.
  22. Scholle SH, Roski J, Dunn DL, Adams JL, et al. Availability of data for measuring physician quality performance. Am J Manage Care. 2009;15(1):67-72.
  23. Tinsley JA. An education intervention to improve residents’ inpatient charting. Academic Psychiatry. 2004;28:136-9.
  24. Trowbridge R, Weingarter S. Educational techniques used in changing provider behavior [document on the internet]. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007 [cited 2008 Dec 27]. Available from:
  25. Van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ. 2005;39:309–17.
  26. Weiss KB, Wagner R. Performance measurement through audit, feedback, and profiling as tools for improving clinical care. Chest. 2000;118:53S-8S.
  27. Ruedy J. Assessing student–clinical competence versus performance [document on the internet]. [cited 2010 Oct 10]. Available from:


Article Metrics

Abstract views : 974 | views : 1876


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Fielda Djuita, Harsono Mardiwiyoto, Ova Emilia, Soehartati Soehartati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:


JPKI Stats