Implementasi dan Evaluasi Modul Pembelajaran Ilmu Pendidikan Kedokteran untuk Mahasiswa Kedokteran Tahap Preklinik

Natalia Puspadewi(1*), Elisabeth Rukmini(2)

(1) Medical Education Unit Fakultas Kedokteran Unika Atma Jaya
(*) Corresponding Author


Background: To keep up with current development in medicine, every doctor is demanded to be able to do continuing medical education (CME) after finishing their medical degree. However, health education institutions are responsible to make sure their graduates are able to do so by developing their self regulated learning (SRL) skills. Therefore, we developed a learning module that not only use adult learning approach but also maximizing the teachers’ role in the teaching and learning process by using a programmatic assessment model.

Method: The learning activities mostly used SCL approach (62,7%), and were comprised of 8 different learning method. The assessment activities were done by using a combination of assessment method to assess the student’s cognitive, skills, and professional behavior. The student was also asked to do a self evaluation using reflective writing assignment, and each of the student also received 360 degree. Each student was assigned to 1 mentor to guide him/her throughout the course.

Results: More than half of the students (52,24%) claimed that they were ‘forced’ to take the course because they didn’t get into their first choice elective block. However, at the end of the block, all of the students had a change of perspective and agreed that this block was interesting and useful for them.

Conclusion: The students are able to be independent if we, as teachers, maximized our role as facilitators and mentors, and give the students bigger autonomy in their study.


self regulated learning, student centered learning, elective module

Full Text:



  1. Dornan T, Mann K, Scherpbier A, Spencer J (ed). Medical education: theory and practice. Elsevier; 2011.
  2. KKI. Standar Pendidikan Profesi Dokter Indonesia. Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia; 2012.
  3. Murdoch-Eaton, D. & Whittle, S. Generic skills in medical education: developing the tools for successful lifelong learning: Generic skills in medical education. Med. Educ. 2012; 46: 120–8.
  4. Berkhout, J. J. et al. Exploring the factors influencing clinical students’ self-regulated learning. Med. Educ. 2015; 49: 589–600.
  5. Frambach, J. M., Driessen, E. W., Chan, L.-C. & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. Rethinking the globalisation of problem-based learning: how culture challenges self-directed learning: Rethinking the globalisation of PBL. Med. Educ. 2012; 46: 738–47.
  6. Stes, A., De Maeyer, S. & Van Petegem, P. Examining the Cross-Cultural Sensitivity of the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) and Validation of a Dutch Version. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e54099.
  7. Khoo, H. E. Implementation of problem-based learning in Asian medical schools and students’ perceptions of their experience. Med. Educ. 2003; 37: 401–9.
  8. Musick, D. W., McDowell, S. M., Clark, N. & Salcido, R. Pilot study of a 360-degree assessment instrument for physical medicine & rehabilitation residency programs. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Assoc. Acad. Physiatr. 2003; 82: 394–402.
  9. Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. et al. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med. Teach. 2012; 34: 205–14.
  10. Cox, M., Irby, D. M. & Epstein, R. M. Assessment in Medical Education. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007; 356: 387–96.
  11. Khan, K. Z., Ramachandran, S., Gaunt, K. & Pushkar, P. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE Guide No. 81. Part I: An historical and theoretical perspective. Med. Teach. 2013; 35: e1437–e46.
  12. Driessen, E. W., van Tartwijk, J., Govaerts, M., Teunissen, P. & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: A Maastricht case report. Med. Teach. 2012; 34: 226–31.
  13. Stegers-Jager, K. M., Cohen-Schotanus, J. & Themmen, A. P. N. Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance: Motivation, learning strategies and participation. Med. Educ. 2012; 46: 678–88.
  14. Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E. & Freeman, S. Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science. 2011; 332: 1213–6.


Article Metrics

Abstract views : 3310 | views : 5894


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Natalia Puspadewi, Elisabeth Rukmini

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:

JPKI Stats