The Preceptions of students and Teachers about The Level of The Sanctions for academic Integrity Violans: An Explanatory Sequential Design Study in a Nursing Education Program

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.32248

Yogik Setia Anggreini(1*), Yayi Suryo Prabandari(2), Titi Savitri Prihatiningsih(3)

(1) Master in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta - INDONESIA
(2) Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta - INDONESIA
(3) Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta - INDONESIA
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Professional Behavior is a reflection of the professionalism, which includes academic integrity. Some of student’s behavioral violations related to academic integrity are influenced by perception. However, students and lecturers tend to interpret these violations differently associated with severity of academic integrity, for example, the sanction against violations of academic integrity. Thus, these differences may contribute to the number of occurrences of academic integrity violations. This study aims to identify the perception of nursing students and lecturers about the level of sanctions for violations of academic integrity.

Method: This study used a mixed method using a sequential explanatory design. This was also a quantitative research survey using a questioner to 101 nursing students, followed by focus group discussion done by the students and in-depth interviews to four lecturers.

Results: The behavior deemed not to be in violation was 1% -5.9%. Most students chose sanction level 2 (21.8% - 66.35%), sanction level 3 (23.8% - 28.7%) and the highest sanction level or level 10 (19.8%)

Conclusion: The perception of students to the sanction level out of 22 items, 15 items nursing students chose sanction level 2 “verbal warning” (21.8% - 66.35%), 2 items students chose sanction level 3 “written warning” (23.8% -28.7%). The highest sanction level chosen was level 10 “reported to the professional regulatory body” (19.8%). The lecturers assumed that mild sanction first given was in the form of verbal warning and the toughest was being suspended.


Keywords


Academic integrity, perception, the level of sanctions

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Bolin AU. Self-Control, Perceived Opportunity, and Attitudes as Predictor of Academic Dishonesty. The Journal of Psychology, 2004;138(2):101-14.                      
  2. Harding TS, Carpenter DD, Finelli CJ, Passow HJ. Does Academic Dishonesty relate to Unethical Behavior in Professional Practice? An Explanatory Study. Science and Enginering Ethics, 2004;10:311-24.
  3. Ronokusumo  S. Integritas  Akademik  “Sekedar  Kata atau  Nyata”. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Universitas Indonesia; 2012.
  4. Musharyanti L. Persepsi dan Perilaku Mahasiswa Keperawatan tentang Integritas Akademik di Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada: Tesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2010.
  5. International Center for Academic Integrity. The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity Second Edition. Illinois: Office of College Relation at Oakton Community College, Des Plaines, Illinois: Clemson University; 2012.
  6. Muktamiroh H. Hubungan antara Kapasitas mental dan Kepribadian Dasar Berdasarkan Pengukuran MMPI-2 dengan Persepsi, Perilaku dan Intensi Integritas Akademik Mahasiswa FK UPN Veteran Jakarta: Tesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2012.
  7. Theart CJ. The Status of Academic Integrity among Nursing Students. Thesis. Master of Nursing. Stellenbosch University; 2011.
  8. Hafeez K, Khan M, Laiq-uz-Zaman, Jawaid M, Haroon S. Academic Misconduct among Student in Medical Colleges of Karachi, Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci, 2013;29 (3): 699-702.
  9. Steven TN. Promoting A Culture of Integrity: A Study of Faculty and Student Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty at Large Public Midwestern University. Dissertation. University of Missouri-ST.Louis: ProQuest LLC; 2012.
  10. Kwong T, Man NH, Mark KP, Wong E. Students’ and Faculty’s Perception of Academic Integrity in Hongkong. Emerald Insight Group Publishing, 2010;27(5): 341-56.
  11. Whitley BE. Factors Associated with Cheating among College Students: A Review. Research in Higher Education, 1998;8(3).
  12. Sarwono SW. Teori-teori Psikologi Sosial. Edisi revisi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada; 2008.
  13. Zivcakova L, Wood E, Baetz-Pasquale DD. How Do Faculty Members Respond to the their Students’s Discussions of Academic Misconduct and Academic Integrity?. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2012;8(1):25-40.
  14. Roff S, Dherwani K. Development of Inventory for Polyprofessionalism Lapses at the Proto-professional stage of Health Professions Education Together with Recommended Responses. Med Teach, 2011;33:239-43.
  15. Arhin AO, Jones KA. A Multidiscipline exploration of College Student’s Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty: Are Nursing Students Different from Other College Students? Nurse Education Today, 2009;29:710-4.
  16. Cresswell JW. Research Design: Pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif dan Mixed edisi ketiga. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2012.
  17. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research Method in Education, seventh edition, New York: Routledge; 2011.
  18. Chapfika B. The Role of Integrity in Higher Education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2008;4(1):43-9.
  19. AIPNI. Kurikulum Pendidikan Sarjana Keperawatan. Jakarta: AIPNI; 2015.
  20. Pincus HS, Schmelkin LP. Faculty Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty: A Multidiscipline Scalling Analysis. Jounal of Higher Education, 2003;74(2).
  21. Whitley BE, Spiegel PK. Acadeemic Integrity as an Institutional Issue. Ethics & Behavior, 2001;11(3):325-42.
  22. Hutchis B, Cobb S. When Will We Be Ready for Academic Integrity? Journal of Dental Education, 2008;.
  23. McCabe DL, Butterfield KD, Trevino LK. Faculty and Academic Integrity: The Influence of Current Honor Codes and Past Honor Code Experiences. Research in Higher Education, 2003;44(3).
  24. Hilbert GA. Involvement of Nursing Student in Unethical Classroom and Clinical Behaviors. Journal of Professional Nursing, 1985;1:230-4.
  25. Nonis S, Swift CO. An Examination of the Relations Between Academic Dishonesty and Workplace Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 2001;77(2): ProQuest Education Journals pg. 69.
  26. Papadakis MA, Hodgson CS, Teherani A, Kohatsu ND. Unprofessional Behavior in Medical School Is Assosiated with Subsequent Disciplinary Action by a State Medical Board. Acad Med, 2004;79:244-9.
  27. Rujoiu O, Rujoiu V. Academic Dishonesty and Workplace Dishonesty An Overview. Proceedings of The 8th International Management Conference. Romania; 2014.
  28. Woith W, Jenkins SD, Kerber C. Perceptions of Academic Integrity among Nursing Students. Nursing Forum, 2012;47(4).
  29. Olasehinde-Williams O. Instituting Academic Integrity In Nigerian Universities: Psychological Perspectives of Morality and Motivation. Journal of Sociology and Education in Africa, 2006;4(2).
  30. Byszewski A, Handelman W, McGuinty C, Moineau G. Wanted: Role Models-Medical Students’s Perceptions of Professionalism. BMC Medical Education, 2012;12:115.
  31. Hulsart R,  McCarthy  V. Educator’s  Role  in  Promoting  Academic Integrity. Proceedings of the Allied Academies, 2008;15(2).
  32. Bandura A. Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development Volume 1: Theory (Social Cognitive Theory of Moral Thought and Action). Florida International University: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1991.
  33. Ormrod JE. Human Learning, 6th edition, USA: Pearson; 2012.
  34. Roff S, Chandratilake M, McAleer S, Gibson J. Medical Student Rankings of Proposed Sanction for Unprofessional Behavior relating to Academic Integrity: Result from Scottish Medical School. Scottish Medical Journal, 2012;57:76-9.
  35. Resurreccion PF. The Impact of Faculty, Peers and Integrity Culture in the Academe on Academic Misconduct among Filipino Students: An Empirical Study Based on Social Cognitif Theory. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2012;2(2):33-50.
  36. International Center for Academic Integrity. The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity Second Edition. Illinois: Office of College Relation at Oakton Community College, Des Plaines, Illinois: Clemson University; 2013.
  37. Elzubeir MA, Rizk DEE. Exploring Perceptions and Attitudes of Senior Medical Students and Interns to Academic Integrity. Med Educ, 2003;37:589-96.
  38. Tippitt MP, Kline JR, Tilghman J, Chamberlain B, Meagher PG. Creating Environment that Foster Academic Integrity. Nursing Education Perspectives, 2009;10(4).
  39. Tanner CA. Moral decline or programmatic decision making? Cheating and plagiarism in perspective. Journal of Nursing Education, 2004;43(7):291-2.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.32248

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 584 | views : 441

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia; The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

JPKI Stats