ANALYSIS OF PROGRESS TEST RESULTS IN MEDICAL FACULTY STUDENTS

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.49224

Ade Pryta Romanauli Simaremare(1*)

(1) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Medan – INDONESIA
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


 

Background: Assessment of learning outcomes is an important evaluation material to show how the teaching and learning process has been carried out. It can be obtained from formative and summative assessment, then students are given feedback from these results. One method for formative evaluation is a progress test. During the implementation at the HKBP Nommensen University Faculty of Medicine, there had never been an analysis of the results of the Progress Test activity. This study was conducted for analysing of the results of the Progress Test held in the even semester of the 2018/2019 academic year.

Methods: This study used an observational descriptive design with cross sectional method. The sample were all students of the Faculty of Medicine who were actively studying in the even semester of the 2018/2019 Academic Year totaling 215 subjects. Item analysis was done on the questions for basic and clinical medicine category by the level of difficulty and the discrimination index based on students’ study period.

Results: Students passing rate that attended the progress test in this study were very low. However, the score achieved by the students increased along with the length of students’ study period. Item analysis resulted the difficulty level majority at the medium level, and the discrimination index majority at the poor level for both the basic and clinical medicine science category.

Conclusion: Progress testing can be used as a tool to help curriculum designer see the development of students’ knowledge skills both individually and in population.


Keywords


progress test, medical student, formative evaluation, item analysis

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia. Standar Kompetensi Dokter Indonesia. Jakarta; 2012.
  2. Alwan I Al, Kushi A Al, Albanyan E, Zamakhshary M, Kadri HMF Al. The Progress Test as a Diagnostic Tool for a New PBL Curriculum. 2011: 1–10.
  3. Vleuten C Van Der, Sluijsmans D. Competence Assessment as Learner Support in Education. 2017: 607–30.
  4. Mirfat, Yuhernita. Pemanfaatan Progress Test Sebagai Tolak Ukur Keberhasilan Belajar Mahasiswa. J Pendidik Kedokt Indones. 2014; 3(3): 170–6.
  5. Wrigley W, Vleuten CPMVANDER, Freeman A, Muijtjens A. AMEE GUIDE A systemic framework for the progress test : Strengths , constraints and issues : AMEE Guide No . 71. 2012; 31(71): 683–97.
  6. Vleuten C Van Der, Freeman A, Fernando C. Progress test utopia. 2018; 2–4.
  7. Tomic ER, Martins MA, Lotufo PA, Benseñor IM. Progress Testing: Evaluation of Four Years of Application in the School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo. 2005; 60(5): 389–96.
  8. Presiden Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2013 Tentang Pendidikan Kedokteran. Presiden Republik Indonesia; 2013.
  9. Fitri AD. Penerapan Problem Based Learning (PBL) dalam Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. JMJ. 2016; 4(1): 95–100.
  10. Gipps C V. Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Educational Assessment. Routledge; 2015.
  11. Schuwirth LWT, Vleuten CPM Van Der. The use of progress testing. 2012; 24–30.
  12. Williams RG, Klamen DL, White CB, Petrusa E, Fincher RE, Whitfield CF, et al. Tracking Development of Clinical Reasoning Ability Across Five Medical Schools Using a Progress Test. Acad Med. 2011; 86(9): 1148–54.
  13. Chen Y, Henning M, Yielder J, Jones R, Wearn A, Weller J. Progress testing in the medical curriculum : students ’ approaches to learning and perceived stress. BMC Med Educ. 2015; 1–8.
  14. Tio RA, Schutte B, Meiboom AA, Greidanus J, Dubois EA, Bremers AJA. The progress test of medicine : the Dutch experience. Perspect Med Educ. 2016; 5: 51–5.
  15. Karelia BN, Pillai Aj, Vegada BN. The Levels of Difficulty and Discrimination Indices and Relationship Between Them in Four- Response Type Multiple Choice Questions of Pharmacology Summative Tests of Year II M.B.B.S Students. le JSME. 2013; 7(2): 41–6.
  16. Suswati I. Analisis Validitas Materi Uji Multiple Choise Question dengan Learning Objectives Blok Endokrin. Saintika Med. 2011; 7(5): 14–9.
  17. Aziza RN, Dzhalila D. Metode Kuantitatif dengan Pendekatan Klasik pada Aplikasi Analisis Butir Soal Sebagai Media Evaluasi Penentuan Soal yang Berkualitas. J Kaji Ilmu dan Teknol. 2018; 7(1): 15–23.
  18. Afandi D, Budiningsih Y, Safitry O, Purwadianto A, Widjaja IR, Merlina D. Analisis Butir Uji , Reliabilitas , dan Validitas Tes Kaidah Dasar Bioetika. Maj Kedokt Indon. 2007: 205–10.
  19. Hingorjo MR, Jaleel F. Analysis of One-Best MCQs : the Difficulty Index , Discrimination Index and Distractor Efficiency. J Pak Med Assoc. 2012; 62(2): 142–7.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.49224

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 960 | views : 1439

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Ade Pryta Romanauli Simaremare

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:

 

JPKI Stats