FLIPPED CLASSROOM IMPLEMENTATION ON MECHANISM OF NUTRIENT HANDLING TO FACILITATE MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVE APPROACH

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.85078

Andreanyta Meliala(1*), Yustina Andwi Ari Sumiwi(2), Ch.Tri Nuryana(3), Sunarti Sunarti(4), Paramita Narwidina(5)

(1) Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sleman, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Department of Histology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Farmako Street, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
(3) Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada
(4) Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Farmako Street, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
(5) Clinical Nutrition Research Group, Yogyakarta 55132, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Due to the content of lectures for nutrient handling often delivered from one scientific discipline, students do not gain a comprehensive understanding. The flipped classroom learning approach helps improve students' overall comprehension by integrating multiple scientific disciplines such as physiology, anatomy, biochemistry, and histology.

Aims: The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of the flipped classroom learning approach in nutrition management lectures that incorporate physiology, anatomy, biochemistry, and histology.

Methods: A basic pre-post test design was employed in this research. The flipped classroom method was used by first asking students to learn the topic via instructional videos, lecture files, and a pre-test (58 questions) on the eLOK UGM platform. The panel discussion was then carried out by lectures from four departments, including physiology, anatomy, biochemistry, and histology, via the Zoom platform (virtual synchronous learning). Finally, students were required to do a post-test with the same content as the pre-test.

Results: According to the findings of this study, the average pre-test score of college participants was less than 80, whereas the average post-test score was 84.22, with 73.20% of the participants scoring higher than 80. The integrated panel discussion affected male participants' N-Gain scores. Male participants scored 0.74 (high category) while female participants scored 0.69 (medium category). 

Conclusions: The flipped classroom method can support approaches from departments of anatomy, physiology, histology, and biochemistry - in a relatively time-efficient but more effective means of improving understanding of nutrient handling.


Keywords


flipped classroom, pre-test, post-test, eLOK UGM, panel discussion

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Wang Y. A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Traditional and Modern Teaching Methods. Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2022). 2022;720:270–7. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-89-3_32
  2. Hiryanto. Pedagogi, Andragogi dan Heutagogi serta Implikasinya dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Dinamika Pendidikan. 2017;XXII:65–71.
  3. Haleem A, Javaid M, Qadri MA, Suman R. Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers. 2022;3(2022):275–85.
  4. Perveen A. Synchronous and Asynchronous E-Language Learning: A Case Study of Virtual University of Pakistan. Open Praxis. 2016;8(1):21. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.1.212
  5. Stefan Hrastinski. A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes [Internet]. Vol. 4, Educause quarterly. 2008. p. 51–5. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning
  6. Fabriz S, Mendzheritskaya J, Stehle S. Impact of Synchronous and Asynchronous Settings of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education on Students’ Learning Experience During COVID-19. Front Psychol. 2021;12(733554):1–16.
  7. Amiti F. Synchronous and Asynchronous E-Learning. European Journal of Open Education and E-learning Studies. 2020;5(2):60–70. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3313
  8. Coletta VP, Steinert JJ. Why normalized gain should continue to be used in analyzing preinstruction and postinstruction scores on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2020;16(1):10108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010108
  9. Hake R. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand_student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics. 1998;66(64).
  10. Young TP, Bailey CJ, Guptill M, Thorp AW, Thomas TL. The flipped classroom: A modality for mixed asynchronous and synchronous learning in a residency program. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014;15(7):938–44. https://doi.org/10.5811/WESTJEM.2014.10.23515
  11. Chiang FK, Chen C. Modified Flipped Classroom Instructional Model in “Learning Sciences” Course for Graduate Students. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. 2017;26(1–2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0321-2
  12. Serdyukov P. Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning. 2017;10(1):4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-10-2016-0007
  13. Rehman R, Fatima SS. An innovation in Flipped Class Room : A teaching model to facilitate synchronous and asynchronous learning during a pandemic. Pak J Med Sci January. 2021;37(February):1.
  14. Dimitrios B, Labros S, Nikolaos K, Maria K, Athanasios K. Traditional teaching methods vs teaching through the application of information and communication technologies in the accounting field: quo vadis? European Scientific Journal. 2013;9(28):73–101.
  15. Paper C, Ramirez D. Advantages and Disadvantages of Flipped Classroom : Stem Students ’ Perceptions Advantages and Disadvatages of Flipped Classroom : Stem Students ´ Perceptions. In: The advantages of using MOOcs in energy risks education. 2016. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2430.8965
  16. Shivaraju PT, Manu G, Vinaya M, Savkar MK. Evaluating the effectiveness of pre- and post-test model of learning in a medical school. 2017;7(9):947–51. https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2017.7.0412802052017
  17. Latimier A, Riegert A, Peyre H, Ly ST, Casati R, Ramus F. Does pre-testing promote better retention than post-testing? Nature [Internet]. 2019;4(1):1–7.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.85078

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 612 | views : 438

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Andreanyta Meliala

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:

  

 JPKI Stats