The Relationship Between Anatomy Identification Test Scores and The Suitability in V/A/R/K Modality Usage Between Study Habit and Learning Style

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.92758

Catharina Widiartini(1*), Miko Ferine(2), Fajar Wahyu Pribadi(3)

(1) Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
(2) Department of Bioethics/Medical Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto
(3) Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Background: Mastery of Anatomy is essential to base learning in Medicine. However, the Anatomy identification test scores are often less than satisfactory. This problem could be caused by different usage of sensory modalities which were visual, aural, read/write, and kinaesthetic (V/A/R/K) between one’s study habit and his/her learning style. This study aimed to determine the relationship between Anatomy identification test scores and the suitability in V/A/R/K modality usage between study habits and learning styles.

Method: This was an observational study of 103 first year students of the Faculty of Medicine Unsoed who were selected using total sampling, taking into account the inclusion criteria in the form of complete data availability for the three variables. Univariate statistical analyses were conducted for each variable as well as the suitability between study habits and learning style based on determined criteria. Relationship between Anatomy identification test scores and the suitability between V/A/R/K study habits and learning styles was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test.

Results: Most students had quadmodal learning style (27.2%), but unimodal visual study habit (21.4%). Most (64.1%) students had no suitability between study habits and learning styles, with the test score average was not significantly lower (p = 0.228) than those with suitability. 

Conclusion: There is no significant relationship between Anatomy identification test scores and the suitability between study habits and learning styles. Students may reflect on the result to modify their learning process further. Institution can provide opportunities for students with various characteristics to develop study habits that suit their learning styles.


Keywords


Anatomy, identification test score, learning style, study habits, suitability, VARK

Full Text:

PDF


References

  1. Caswell FR, Venkatesh A, Denison AR. Twelve Tips for Enhancing Anatomy Teaching and Learning Using Radiology. Med Teach [Internet]. 2015;37(12):1067–71. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1029896

  2. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The Anatomy of Anatomy: A Review for Its Modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(2):83–93.

  3. Biggs J. Approaches to Learning in Secondary and Tertiary Students in ong Kong: Some Comparative Studies. Educ Res J. 1991;6:27–39.

  4. Entwistle N. Predicting Academic Performance at University. In: Student Learning and Academic Understanding. Edinburgh: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2018. p. 29–43.

  5. Fleming ND, Mills C. Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection. To Improv Acad. 1992;11(20210331).

  6. Credé M, Kuncel NR. Study Habits Meta-Analysis. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008;(November, 2008).

  7. Khurshid F, Tanveer A, Qasmi FN. Relationship between Study Habits and Academic Achievement among Hostel Living and Day Scholars’ University Students. Br J Humanit Soc Sci. 2012;3(2):34–42.

  8. Fleming ND. Facts, Fallacies and Myths: VARK and Learning Preferences Learning Style or Learning Preferences ? 2012;(December):3. Available from: http://vark-learn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Some-Facts-About-VARK.pdf

  9. Gas-Ib Carbonel L. Learning Styles, Study Habits, and Academic Performance of College Students At Kalinga-Apayao State College, Philippines. Int J Adv Res Manag Soc Sci [Internet]. 2013;2(8):245–58. Available from: www.garph.co.uk

  10. Hoeffner KA. The Effects of Learning-Styles Information on the Achievement of Community College Developmental Math Students [Internet]. Vol. 53, USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations. University of South Florida; 2010. Available from: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/1658

  11. Alattas MM. Hubungan antara Kesesuaian Gaya Belajar dengan Kebiasaan Belajar dan Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa Jurusan Kedokteran Universitas Jenderal Soedirman Angkatan 2016. Universitas Jenderal Soedirman; 2016.

  12. Wijaya KFN. Perbandingan Rerata Nilai Ujian Identifikasi Anatomi Mahasiswa FK Unsoed Berdasarkan Kesesuaian Antara Gaya Belajar Dengan Kebiasaan Belajar Model VARK [Internet]. Universitas Jenderal Soedirman; 2018. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sph&AN=119374333&site=ehost-live&scope=site%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.032%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.03.010%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.006

  13. Husmann PR, O’Loughlin VD. Another Nail in the Coffin for Learning Styles? Disparities among Undergraduate Anatomy Students’ Study Strategies, Class Performance, and Reported VARK Learning Styles. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;12(1):1–14.

  14. Ummu Kalzum M, Emilia O, Rahayu RG, Ibrahim J. Aplikasi Gaya Belajar pada Kegiatan Belajar Mandiri Mahasiswa Tahun Pertama Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar. Magna Med [Internet]. 2017;1(4):1–23. Available from: https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/APKKM/article/view/3278

  15. Fakultas Kedokteran Unsoed. Buku Pedoman Sistem Pendidikan Jurusan Kedokteran Umum Tingkat Sarjana, Fakultas Kedokteran Unsoed. 2020.

  16. Leite WL, Svinicki M, Shi Y. Attempted Validation of The Scores of the VARK: Learning Styles Inventory with Multitrait-Multimethod Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models. Educ Psychol Meas. 2010;70(2):323–39.

  17. Fitkov-Norris ED, Yeghiazarian A. Validation of VARK learning modalities questionnaire using Raseh analysis. J Phys Conf Ser. 2015;588(1).

  18. Paiboonsithiwong S, Kunanitthaworn N, Songtrijuck N, Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T. Learning styles, academic achievement, and mental health problems among medical students in Thailand. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016;13:38.

  19. Meyer AJ, Stomski NJ, Innes SI, Armson AJ. VARK learning preferences and mobile anatomy software application use in pre-clinical chiropractic students. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(3):247–54.

  20. Bhagat A, Vyas R, Singh T. Students awareness of learning styles and their perceptions to a mixed method approach for learning. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2015;5(4):58.

  21. Prithishkumar IJ, Michael SA. Understanding Your Student: Using the VARK Model. J Postgrad Med. 2014;60(2):183–6.

  22. Whillier S, Lystad RP, Abi-Arrage D, McPhie C, Johnston S, Williams C, et al. The Learning Style Preferences of Chiropractic Students: A cross-Sectional Study. J Chiropr Educ [Internet]. 2014;28(1):21–7. Available from: www.journalchiroed.com

  23. Cakiroglu U. Analyzing the Effect of Learning Styles and Study Habits of Distance Learners on Learning Performances: A case of An Introductory Programming Course. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. 2014;15(4):161–85.

  24. Nuthana PG, Yenagi G V. Influence of Study habits , Self-concept on Academic Achievement of Boys and Girls *. Karnataka J Agric Sci. 2009;22(5):1135–8.

  25. Garner-O’Neale LD, Harrison S. An Investigation of the Learning styles and Study Habits of Chemistry Undergraduates in Barbados and their Effect as Predictors of Academic Achievement in Chemical Group Theory. J Educ Soc Res. 2013;3(2):107–22.

  26. Husmann PR, Barger JB, Schutte AF. Study Skills in Anatomy and Physiology: Is there a Difference? Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(1):18–27.

  27. Arikunto S. Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. 2010.

  28. Hadi S. Statistik. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2015.

  29. Topala I, Tomozii S. Learning Satisfaction: Validity and Reliability Testing for Students’ Learning Satisfaction Questionnaire (SLSQ). Procedia - Soc Behav Sci [Internet]. 2014;128:380–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.175

  30. Mohamad MM, Sulaiman NL, Sern LC, Salleh KM. Measuring the Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci [Internet]. 2015;204(January 2016):164–71. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129

  31. Sudaryono, Rahardja U, Aini Q, Isma Graha Y, Lutfiani N. Validity of Test Instruments. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1364(1).

  32. Erlinawati E, Muslimah M. Test Validity and Reliability in Learning Evaluation. Bull Community Engagem. 2021;1(1):26.

  33. What do we know about VARK [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Oct 1]. Available from: https://vark-learn.com/research-statistics/

  34. Panadero E. A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Front Psychol. 2017;8(APR):1–28.

  35. Biggs J, Kember D, Leung DYP. The Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Br J Educ Psychol. 2001;71:133–49.

  36. Bandura A. Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):248–87.

  37. Prociuk TJ, Breen LJ. Locus of Control, Study Habits and Attitudes, and College Academic Performance. J Psychol Interdiscip Appl. 1974;88(1):91–5.

  38. Thistlethwaite J. More thoughts on “assessment drives learning.” Med Educ. 2006;40(11):1149–50.

  39. Papinczak T, Young L, Groves M, Haynes M. Effects of A Metacognitive Intervention on Students’ Approaches to Learning and Self-Efficacy in A First Year Medical Course. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2006;13(2):213–32.

  40. Standring S. A Brief History of Topographical Anatomy. J Anat. 2016;229(1):32–62.

  41. Fatharani LA. Perbandingan Rerata Nilai Ujian Pilihan Ganda Semester Pertama Mahasiswa FK Unsoed Berdasarkan Kesesuaian Gaya Belajar dan Kebiasaan Belajar Model VARK. Universitas Jenderal Soedirman; 2018.

  42. Shenoy N, Ashok Shenoy K, Ratnakar UP. The Perceptual Preferences in Learning Among Dental Students in Clinical Subjects. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2013;7(8):1683–5.

  43. Ahmad S, Kausar RR. Comparison of Study Habits and Academic Performance of Pakistani British and White British Students. Pakistan J Soc Clin Psychol [Internet]. 2011;9:21–6. Available from: http://www.gcu.edu.pk/FullTextJour/PJSCS/2011/4.pdf

  44. Eom SB, Wen HJ, Ashill N. The Determinants of Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation*. Decis Sci J Innov Educ. 2006;4(2):215–35.

  45. Du Y, Simpson C. Effects of Learning Styles and Class Participation on Students’ Enjoyment Level in Distributed Learning Environments. In: Annual Conference of the Association for Library and Information Science Education. New Orleans; 2002.

  46. Ahisya H, Utami D, Supriyati, Farich A. The Learning Style with Student Achievements in the Faculty of General Medicine, Malahayati University. J Ilm Kesehat Sandi Husada [Internet]. 2020;9(1):103–8. Available from: https://akper-sandikarsa.e-journal.id/JIKSH

  47. Peyman H, Sadeghifar J, Khajavikhan J, Yasemi M, Rasool M, Yaghoubi MY, et al. Using VARK Approach for Assessing Preferred Learning Styles of First Year Medical Sciences Students: A Survey from Iran. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2014;8(8):1–4.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.92758

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 218 | views : 90

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Catharina Widiartini

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education) indexed by:


JPKI Stats