Exploring Community Engagement Challenges in the Mining Sector of South Africa

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpkm.72217

Solomon Mandla Zembe(1*), Neil Barnes(2)

(1) Department of Business Administration, Management College of Southern Africa, Durban, South Africa
(2) Department of Business Administration, Management College of Southern Africa, Durban, South Africa
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


South Africa has recently experienced an increase in unrest within urban and rural communities, despite attempts from both government and business levels to engage communities through Community Engagement (CE) forums. This has had a negative impact on the operations of businesses in the mining industry in South Africa. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore CE challenges in the South African mining sector. The study used qualitative research methods where semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussion, were conducted among different stakeholders who were selected purposefully. The data were thematically analysed using the Atlas.ti software programme. The following themes were identified: Anglo Social Way, CE approaches, CE structures, guiding policies, terms of references, and municipality framework. It was recommended that community members needed to be educated on how the mine interacts with the community, its activities, and their participation as well as eliminating community unrest in order to improve communication amongst all stakeholders.

Keywords


Business operations; Education; Participation; Stakeholders; Unrest

Full Text:

PDF


References

AMPLATs Group Policy. (2016). Corporate affairs: Social performance. Anglo American Platinum.

Boutilier, R. G., & Thomson, I. (2011). Modelling and measuring the social license to operate: Fruits of a dialogue between theory and practice. Social Licence, 1, 1-10.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77- 101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp06 3oa

Browne, A. L., Stehlik, D., & Buckley, A. (2011). Social licences to operate: For better not for worse; for richer not for poorer? The impacts of unplanned mining closure for “Fence line” residential communities. Local Environment, 16(7), 707-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.592183

Brunton, G., Thomas, J., O’Mara-Eves, A., Jamal, F., Oliver, S., & Kavanagh, J. (2017). Narratives of community engagement: A systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions. BMC Public Health, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1 186/s12889-017-4958-4

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design. choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). CA. SAGE.

Davis, R., & Franks, D. M. (2011). The costs of conflict with local communities in the extractive industry. In Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Social Responsibility in Mining, Santiago, Chile, 30, 7576- 7581.

Esteves, A. M. Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2012). Impact assessment and project appraisal. Social Impact Assessment: The State of Art, 30(1), 34-42.

Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research. (5th edition). Sage Publications.

Glandon, D., Paina, L., Alonge, O., Peters, D. H., & Bennett, S. (2017). 10 best resources for community engagement in implementation research. Health Policy and Planning, 32(10), 1457-1465.

Johnson, B. J. (2020). Community engagement: Barriers and drivers in South African higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 34(6), 87-105.

Mineral Council of South Africa. (2020). Integrated annual review 2020. https://www.mineralscouncil.org. za/annual-review-2020/.

Minerals Council South Africa. (2018). Modernisation: Towards the mine of tomorrow. http://www.minera lscouncil.org.za/industry-news/publicati ons/fact- sheets/send/3- fact- sheets/378- modernisation-towards-the-mine-of-tomorrow.

Moore, T., McDonald, M., McHugh-Dillon, H., & West, S., (2016). Community engagement: A key strategy for improving outcomes for Australian families. Australian Institute of Family Studies, 1-25.

Pereira, AAS, Salgado, E.G., Mincato, R.L., Alvarenga, A.D., & Borges, L.A.C. (2020). Sustainability index of mining: A case study in two companies. Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, 9(2), 115.

Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9 th Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students. 7th. Pearson Education Limited.

Varpio, L., Martimianakis, M. A., & Mylopoulos, M. (2015). Qualitative research methodologies: Embracing methodological borrowing, shifting and importing. Wiley Online Library, 21. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781 118838983.ch21

Walker, M. A. (2014). Community engagement. Virginia Cooperative Extension, 38. 1-7. http://hdl.handle .net/10919/70742

Wang, L., Awuah-Offei, K., Que, S., & Yang, W. (2016). Eliciting drivers of community perceptions of mining projects through effective community engagement. Sustainability, 8(7), 658.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpkm.72217

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 1018 | views : 888

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (Indonesian Journal of Community Engagement)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (Indonesian Journal of Community Engagement)

ISSN (print) 2460-9447ISSN (online) 2541-5883