Analysis of Tourist Typologies and Motivations in Urban Heritage Precincts: The Philosophical Axis of Yogyakarta
https://doi.org/10.22146/jpt.86294 Isabella Fitria Andjanie(1), Lintang Annisa(2), Agustian Harahap(3*), Wiwik Dwi Pratiwi(4)
(1) Magister of Tourism Planning, School of Architecture, Planning, and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung
(2) Magister of Tourism Planning, School of Architecture, Planning, and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung
(3) Magister of Tourism Planning, School of Architecture, Planning, and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung
(4) School of Architecture, Planning, and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Understanding tourist typologies and motivations is crucial for developing efficient tourism products and strategies in urban heritage precincts. Different tourist typologies have unique travel patterns that influence their tendencies and behavior in urban tourism areas. Similarly, tourist motivations affect their preferences for regional attractions and activities. By comprehending tourist typologies and motivations, urban heritage precincts can design tailored marketing strategies and activities catering to diverse tourist types and demands. This study aims to determine the characteristics of tourists visiting the Yogyakarta Philosophical Axis precinct, including their typology and motivation. The methodology involved distributing questionnaires to tourists at various attractions in the Philosophical Axis precinct, and quantitative statistical analysis was performed on the collected data. Based on the processed results of questionnaire data on domestic tourist, the findings reveal that tourists visiting Philosophical Axis fall into three categories: sampler, browser, and explorer, with differences in age range, preferences, and movement distribution patterns. Additionally, there are diverse motivations for tourists visiting the Philosophical Axis precinct, indicating that several activities and experiences can attract tourists to the region. The results of this study also recommend some approaches to optimize tourism planning and management in urban areas tailored to tourists' typology and motivation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Antón, C., Camarero, C., & Laguna-Garcia, M. (2017). Towards a new approach of destination loyalty drivers: Satisfaction, visit intensity and tourist motivations. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(3), 238-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.936834
Bayih, B. E., & Singh, A. (2020). Modeling domestic tourism: motivations, satisfaction and tourist behavioral intentions. Heliyon, 6(9), e04839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04839
Buckley, R., & Carlsen, J. (2002). Heritage tourism: A strategic framework for Irish tourism policy. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 1(1), 9-31.
Butler, R. W. (1980). The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 24(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845410278-007
Cohen, E. (2004). The sociology of tourism: Approaches, issues, and findings. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.10.080184.002105
Ćorović, A., & Obralić, A. (2021). Restoration of the cultural heritage sites in Bosnia and Herzegovina as the basis for intercultural dialogue and development of tourism. Turizam, 25(3), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.5937/turizam25-30494
Crompton, J. L. (1979). Motivations for pleasure vacation. Annals of Tourism Research, 6(4), 408-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(79)90004-5
Dogruyol, K., Aziz, Z., & Arayici, Y. (2018). Eye of sustainable planning: A conceptual heritage-led urban regeneration planning framework. Sustainability, 10(5), 1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051343
Grzywacz, R., & Zeglen, P. (2016). Typology of tourists and their satisfaction level. Scientific Review of Physical Culture, 6(1), 5-16.
Gursoy, D., & McCleary, K. W. (2004). An integrative model of tourists' information search behavior. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(2), 353-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2003.12.004
Hayllar, B., & Griffin, T. (2005). The precinct experience: A phenomenological approach. Tourism Management, 26(4), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.03.011
Hayllar, B., Griffin, T., & Edwards, D. (2010). City spaces-Tourist places. Routledge. http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12505
Huang, B., Xing, K., Pullen, S., & Liao, L. (2020). Exploring carbon neutral potential in urban densification: A precinct perspective and scenario analysis. Sustainability, 12(12), 4814. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124814
Karayazi, S. S., Dane, G., & Vries, B. D. (2021). Utilizing urban geospatial data to Understand heritage attractiveness in Amsterdam. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(4), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10040198
Kim, S. S., & Jamal, T. (2007). Tourists' perceptions of impacts on heritage sites. Tourism Management, 28(3), 562-573.
Köksald, E., Turkan, Z., & Asilsoy, B. (2021). Landscape in Historical Urban Textures:“Walled City Nicosia From the Past To The Present”. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(2), 127-127. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021. v10n2p127
McCabe, S., & Stokoe, E. H. (2004). Place and Identity in Tourists' Accounts. Annals of Tourism Research 31(3) , 601-622
McNulty, R., & Koff, R. (2014). Cultural Heritage Tourism. www.livable.org. Retrieved March 25, 2023, from https://www.americansforthearts.org/sites/default/files/ culturalheritagetourism.pdf
Naumov, N. (2014). Heritage tourism in urban areas–Contemporary complexities and challenges. Illuminare, 12. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/illuminare/ article/view/4256/6463
Pearce, P. L. (2013). The social psychology of tourist behaviour: International series in experimental social psychology (Vol. 3). Elsevier.
Pereira, V., Gupta, J. J., & Hussain, S. (2022). Impact of travel motivation on tourist’s attitude toward destination: Evidence of mediating effect of destination image. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 46(5), 946-971. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348019887528
Pradinar, Fanindya Tustria. Makna Sumbu Filosofi Yogyakarta (Analisis Semiotika Makna Sumbu Filosofi Yogyakarta di Pantai Parangkusumo, Kraton Yogyakarta, Gunung Merapi). Diss. UPN" Veteran" Yogyakarta, 2012. http://repository.upnyk.ac.id/id/eprint/3394
Pratiwi, W. D. (2011). Multicultural heritage in a city as productive tourism places. ASEAN Journal on Hospitality and Tourism, 10(1), 51-62.
Rahmafitria, F., Suryadi, K., Oktadiana, H., Putro, H. P. H., & Rosyidie, A. (2021). Applying knowledge, social concern, and perceived risk in planned behavior theory for tourism in the Covid-19 pandemic. Tourism Review, 76(4), 809-828.
Richards, G. (2011). Creativity and tourism: The state of the art. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1225-1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.07.008
Savitri, M. (2021). The role of local wisdom on the preservation of the Imogiri Royal Cemetery Site. Berkala Arkeologi, 41(1), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.30883/jba.v41i1.567
Song, H., & Kim, H. (2018). Value-based profiles of visitors to a world heritage site: The case of Suwon Hwaseong Fortress (in South Korea). Sustainability, 11(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010132
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Sukardi. 2004. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kompetensi dan Praktiknya. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Timothy, D. J. (2014). Contemporary cultural heritage and tourism: Development issues and emerging trends. Public Archaeology, 13(1-3), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1179/1465518714Z.00000000052
UNESCO. (2009). World Heritage and tourism: Managing for the global and local. UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
UNWTO. (2010). International Recommendations for Tourism Statistics 2008. United Nations Publication
Wijayanti, A., & Damanik, J. (2019). Analysis of the tourist experience of management of a heritage tourism product: case study of the Sultan Palace of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 14(2), 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2018.1494182
Yan, W., Liu, Y., & Zhao, C. (2018, March). Research on Urban Planning Method in Historical Environment the Case of Epang Palace Archaeological Park and Surroundings. In 2nd International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2018) (pp. 774-777). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccese-18.2018.177
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jpt.86294
Article Metrics
Abstract views : 348
| 
views : 252
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Isabella Fitria Andjanie; Lintang Annisa; Agustian Harahap; Wiwik Dwi Pratiwi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.